Q: Where does Nostr sit in the goods typology?

A tension that surfaced independently across several source readings: the CPR machinery turns on subtractability, and Nostr's layers pull in different directions. Events/ideas are nonsubtractive (public-good side; anti-rival, even — value grows with use); relay storage, bandwidth, and attention are subtractive (CPR side); spam is capture/ congestion pressure converting the public-good layer into a managed CPR. The commons dilemma is less appropriation than pollution and exclusion-coordination — the outcome types Hess & Ostrom list but never center.

Candidate resolution: use the ideas/artifacts/facilities decomposition ({{ref:concept-ideas-artifacts-facilities|Ideas artifacts facilities}}) and assign a goods type per layer, per institutional setting (a good's type can differ across settings — {{ref:src-iad-guide|McGinnis 2010/2011}} §8). Needed for the paper: one paragraph that fixes the resource definition before the action arena is specified.

Related: - {{ref:emergentgov|Index}} - {{ref:concept-cpr-vs-knowledge-commons|CPR theory vs. knowledge commons}} - {{ref:concept-ideas-artifacts-facilities|Ideas artifacts facilities}} - {{ref:q-boundary-sybil|Q: How does a commons reconstitute boundaries it cannot enforce?}}