LIV Golf’s Saudi-backed experiment collapses into a player-owned gamble

LIV Golf’s bankruptcy exposes the limits of its Saudi-funded model, but a proposed BC Partners deal could keep the league alive—smaller, restructured and largely controlled by its players.
LIV Golf’s Saudi-backed experiment collapses into a player-owned gamble

LIV Golf’s Saudi-backed experiment collapses into a player-owned gamble
LIV Golf’s attempt to disrupt professional golf has reached a decisive fault line: the Saudi funding that powered its rise is gone, and the league must now choose between collapse and reinvention.

The league filed for Chapter 11 protection in New Jersey after Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund withdrew its backing. The immediate result is a pause in LIV’s existing business model, with unpaid player compensation, contractors awaiting payment and most operational staff laid off. The filing also threatens to void existing player contracts, underscoring how dramatically the project has changed since its launch.

The liberal account frames bankruptcy primarily as a financing crisis, but points to a possible lifeline: a restructuring agreement with BC Partners that could provide post-bankruptcy funding and leave players with majority ownership. CEO Scott O’Neil said the process would create “the structure and time to pursue a landmark transaction” and build an “innovative, player-first ownership model.” That proposal would preserve LIV, though likely with a smaller and more conventional operation.

The conservative account is more sharply focused on the cost of the Saudi-backed experiment. It estimates LIV spent between $5 billion and $8 billion from 2021 through 2026 and emphasizes millions allegedly owed to stars including Jon Rahm, Bryson DeChambeau, Dustin Johnson and Cam Smith. It characterizes the bankruptcy as the “inevitable outcome” of Saudi Arabia pulling the plug and notes that the league faces additional legal and operational liabilities.

Both perspectives agree that LIV’s original model—lavish spending, guaranteed deals and a direct challenge to the PGA Tour—has failed to sustain itself without PIF. They differ over what follows: a cautionary collapse after extraordinary losses, or a player-led reboot featuring 72-hole tournaments, cuts and qualifiers that increasingly resembles the traditional tour it once sought to replace.

Write a comment