US rejects WHO amendments, shattering CCP’s weaponization of 'pandemics' - America Out Loud News

Source: US rejects WHO amendments, shattering CCP’s weaponization of ‘pandemics’ - America Out Loud News
Publisher: America Out Loud News | Author: Dr. Li-Meng Yan Aug 4, 2025 The Voice of Dr. Yan
Published: August 4, 2025 | Archived: July 17, 2026

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Podcast Index | RSS

On July 18, citing the core reasons of safeguarding national sovereignty and civil liberties, Secretary of State Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Kennedy issued a “Joint Statement by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy on the United States’ Rejection of 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005).”

The statement emphasized that the amendments were vaguely worded, could undermine scientific debate, expand international bureaucrats’ interference in U.S. domestic policy, and threaten freedom of speech, privacy, and individual rights.

Press Release: Joint Statement by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy on the United States’ Rejection of 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations

At a subsequent press conference, Kennedy further noted that the amendments bypass Congress, expand WHO’s powers, and could enable forced lockdowns, vaccine passports, and global health surveillance, all of which could be easily politicized, particularly by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) (https://x.com/nuomt/status/1946370671694803204) Both officials stated that the U.S. will continue to formulate independent public health policy while ensuring international cooperation.

This major statement marks the extension of America’s sovereignty defense line into the core of global governance. It conveys three strategic signals:

First, the clear assertion of the principle of “national priority + post-pandemic de-CCP order reconstruction,” rejecting the legitimacy of the global pandemic governance system and opposing international bureaucrats bypassing Congress to interfere in U.S. policy.

Second, the substantive denial of WHO’s neutrality and moral legitimacy, pointing directly to its role as a CCP proxy and censorship tool, thereby laying the groundwork for future withdrawal or restructuring.

Third, the rejection of vaccine passports, digital health IDs, and global databases, cutting off the internationalization of CCP-style authoritarian technologies.

The statement also hinted at a full reckoning with the 2020–2023 “expert-bureaucrat-international organization” model and the rebuilding of a new public health order based on transparency, accountability, and constitutional sovereignty.

This means the U.S. will lead the reconstruction of a “de-CCP” international system, moving forward simultaneously on the fronts of virus-origin truth, digital sovereignty, and global governance restructuring, fully entering the center stage of history.

WHO’s official rules clearly state that if the United States does not proactively reject the amendments within the deadline, it will be automatically bound to the “global health response mechanism” established by the 2024 amendments — tantamount to forfeiting sovereignty and being passively drawn into the next potential “CCP–WHO-manipulated global health crisis.”

This mechanism would grant the WHO Director-General nearly unlimited discretion to bypass emergency declarations, impose lockdowns, unify global messaging, legitimize vaccine passports and health IDs, and suppress virus-origin investigations and truth dissemination under the guise of combating “misinformation,” while restricting border control and public health autonomy of sovereign states. (https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/international-health-regulations-amendments)

This is a deep-control model: invoking “potential risk” to trigger alerts, using “global coordination” to suppress sovereignty, and leveraging “health security” to seize jurisdiction. Without rejection, the U.S. would once again become a victim of information warfare, losing sovereign decision-making and independent judgment. The July 18 rejection statement by the Trump administration and Secretary Kennedy was a comprehensive exposure and strategic counter to this “biosecurity sovereignty trap,” marking a watershed moment between de-CCP and CCP-entangled global governance.

It also declared that U.S. sovereignty takes precedence over international bureaucratic systems and that America will no longer endorse the structures the CCP uses to cover up the truth.

The 2024 WHO amendments are outwardly packaged as “global health cooperation,” but in reality, they institutionalize the CCP’s “unrestricted warfare” achievements during COVID-19 into the future global pandemic prevention system. The provisions completely avoid accountability for the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2 and Chinese military-civil fusion“gain-of-function” research (AKA “unrestricted bioweapons”), giving the CCP a free pass to launch future “man-made pandemics.”

The newly added “risk communication mechanism” mandates the unified suppression of “misinformation,” effectively legalizing the CCP’s suppression of COVID-19 whistleblowers like me, silencing of laboratory-origin and weaponization essence, and total control of the global information battlefield. Under the guise of “equitable access to vaccines,” the amendments grant the WHO global allocation power over vaccines and medical resources, enabling the CCP to once again trade vaccines for political immunity.

Updated “travel health document” requirements lay the groundwork for internationalizing digital health codes and vaccine passports, while enhanced Director-General discretion to unilaterally declare pandemics bypasses national democratic procedures and creates a de facto global “bio-martial law” command chain. In sum, these amendments embed the CCP’s centralized pandemic response model into international law and global governance. Once automatically accepted, sovereign nations will lose their rights to trace origins, control narratives, and maintain sovereignty in the next “engineered crisis.” (https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Submissions-en.pdf)

The 2024 IHR amendments entirely avoid mentioning “gain-of-function research,” “pathogen weaponization,” “laboratory accidents,” or pandemics caused by “biowarfare/unrestricted warfare,” effectively providing institutional cover and legal interfaces for the CCP or other regimes to engineer future pandemics similar to COVID-19. The provisions contain no mechanisms for investigating or holding accountable viruses of human origin, lab leaks, or state actors manipulating pandemics, focusing only on “international coordinated response” and thus implicitly treating all pandemics as “naturally occurring.” At the same time, the amendments expand the WHO Director-General’s discretion to declare a “pandemic emergency” without national consent, establish a unified information release and “misinformation” suppression system, and require states to adopt health document mutual recognition and resource-sharing mechanisms.

These provisions align closely with the CCP’s COVID-era tactics: using narrative unity to obscure the truth, blocking investigations, leveraging vaccine and resource allocation for advantage, and pushing the internationalization of health codes and vaccine passports. The absence of lab safety audits and accountability means the CCP can continue secret gain-of-function experiments while using the WHO system to suppress the truth.

When the next “biological event” occurs, this amendment framework will provide a fully manipulable “global response mechanism,” helping the perpetrators divert attention, whitewash responsibility, and consolidate digital surveillance and international discourse power.

The U.S. rejection on July 18 was the only correct and necessary strategic break; otherwise, sovereign nations will once again be deceived and entrapped in the next pandemic.

My colleague in the Yan Research Team – co-author of the three Yan Reports – Dr. ShanChang Hu (MD, PhD.) joined me this week. Dr. Hu is also a biomedical expert who grew up in mainland China, just as I did. Dr. Hu (Twitter @baobaoxiaoliao).

The Voice of Dr. Yan can be heard on Saturdays and Sundays at 8 pm ET. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on Apple, Android, or Alexa. All episodes can be found on podcast networks worldwide, the day after airing on talk radio.

Transcript

\[00:00:00\] SPK_1: Foreign.

0:20 Li-Meng Yan: Hello everyone. Welcome to the voice of Dr. Yan. I’m your host Dr. Demon Yan. In this episode I will have my friend Dr. Hu Xiancheng, my regular guest to join us and we will discuss a really significant topic which is about the WHO’s amendment in 2024 which was based on the International Health Regulations on 2005 and that is an amendment. And if you draw that you accept that you are basically in soon future I could predict that suffer another pandemic or whatever things they could call it as pandemic as long as Dr. Tedros or his successor announced that.

1:14 Li-Meng Yan: And then they will apply all the policy policies like what happened not only in the US back back to five years ago, but also in China. Remember the traffic light red, green, yellow like the digital id? Yeah. That’s what they want to apply to you during the next pandemic as well as mandate of like the vaccines, treatments, whatever, shutdown and restrictions, all the things. And also you have to submit your all private information to them because that’s called transparent science and share for the better benefits, whatever.

2:00 Li-Meng Yan: I mean they. They basically pass this amendment without voting and ask everyone who joined WHO to accept it. However. However luckily we have the United States of Department the Secret of State Marco Rubio and the Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy publish a joint statements to reject that. And before we talk about this statement, I would just play Kennedy’s speech after this statement.

2:37 Li-Meng Yan: He explained a lot and I think we should listen to his original speech because it contains a lot of information. \[00:02:48\] SPK_1: Hello everyone, this is your HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. I want to speak to you today about a controversial issue that could directly impact you and your family during a global health emergency. Last year the World Health Organization’s governing body made some far reaching amendments to its international health regulations, otherwise known as the IHR regulations. These regulations establish the legal framework that gives countries rights and responsibilities for managing public health events with global impact. The deadline to reject these amendments is next week and we are rejecting them.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:03:28\] SPK_1: So I’d like to explain to you why. The first reason is national sovereignty. Nations who accept the new regulations are signing over their power in health emergencies to an unelected international organization that could order lockdowns, travel restrictions or any other measures that sees fit. In fact, it doesn’t even need to declare an emergency. Potential public health risks are enough for it to initiate action.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:03:55\] SPK_1: If we’re going to give the WHO that much power, we should at least invite a thorough public debate. Especially since the agreement is an official treaty and it bypasses the U.S. senate, which plays a key role in ensuring major international commitments receive proper democratic oversight. To make matters worse, the new regulations employ extremely broad language that gives the whole unprecedented power. They require countries to establish systems of risk communications so that the WHO can implement unified public messaging globally. That opens the door to the kind of narrative management and propaganda and censorship that we saw during the COVID pandemic.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:04:39\] SPK_1: We don’t want to see that kind of system institutionalized even further. The agreement also contains provisions about global systems of health IDs, vaccine, passports, and a centralized medical database. It lays the groundwork for global medical surveillance of every human being. Maybe if the WHO were an infallible authority untainted by industry influence, we would consider accepting the new regulations. Unfortunately, the COVID pandemic demonstrated otherwise.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:05:12\] SPK_1: During COVID the WHO failed to enforce the international health regulations that were already in place for generations. China withheld critical information about the outbreak for at least a month and faced no real consequences or criticism from WHO. As the 2024 congressional oversight report put it, the WHO was misinformed, denied access to China, and used as a cover for the Chinese Communist Party’s reckless action. These and other atrocities make one thing clear. We must strengthen national and local autonomy to hold global organizations in check and to rest a real balance of power underneath all the bureaucratic language.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:05:56\] SPK_1: What’s at stake here is a vision for our future. Are we going to be subject to a technocratic control system that uses health risks and pandemic preparedness as a Trojan horse to curtail basic democratic freedoms? Do we want a future where every person, every movement, every transaction, every human body is under surveillance at all times? Now, I don’t want to be too alarmist. The new regulations aren’t in themselves medical totalitarianism.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:06:27\] SPK_1: In fact, they were perhaps written with good intentions, but they are definitely a step in the wrong direction. That’s why we’re rejecting the amendments not only on behalf of our own citizens, but the whole world. After all, America could simply ignore the who, but few other countries are as powerful as the United States. Even though many of these amendments are phrased to be non bind, as a practical matter, it’s hard for many countries to resist them, especially when they are dependent on the WHO funding and its partnerships. That’s why we’re taking leadership to stop an agreement that’s bad for the entire world.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:07:07\] SPK_1: I want to be clear that in rejecting these amendments, President Trump and I are not rejecting international cooperation. We can cooperate with other nations without jeopardizing our civil liberties without undermining our Constitution and without seeding away America’s treasured sovereignty. That’s my commitment to you. That’s President Trump’s commitment to you. Thank you and God bless you all.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:07:30\] SPK_1: And God bless our country. God bless America. And yes, Kennedy has pointed out a lot of significant problems in this amendment and also let’s see what else in the joint statement. They emphasize that especially in this statement. This says in 2024, WHO, the World Health assembly adopted abandonment to the international health regulations that significantly expanded WHO authority over international public health responses developed without adequate public input. These amendments expand the role of the WHO in public health emergencies, create additional authorities for the whole for shaping pandemic declarations, and promote WHO’s ability to facilitate equitable access of health commodities.

8:28 Li-Meng Yan: These amendments have undue influence on our domestic health responses from WHO directives. They also fail to adequately address the WHO’s susceptibility to the political influence and censorship, most notably from China during the outbreaks. This amendment was set to become binding on the US regardless of our withdrawal from the who. By the way, since President Trump decided to withdraw from WHO again, that will effect from January 1, 2026. However, it doesn’t matter because according to the amendment, no matter whether you withdraw WHO or not, as long as you are one of the founding country of this transnational organization, you still by default accept all of the amendments unless you publicly reject that.

9:32 Li-Meng Yan: Yeah, that’s what they made inside this amendment, which is really ridiculous. So first let’s say that the two major public statement I just referred to, Both issued on July 18, which is last Friday in fact. Mark strategic extension of the US post pandemic sovereign defense line from domestic policy to the core of global governance architecture. These decorations carry profound historical weight, especially at the intersection of the three critical domains. The truth about the COVID origin, the reconfiguration of international legal authorities and the reassertion of national sovereignty.

10:23 Li-Meng Yan: By the way, when they mention that who’s problem exposed during the pandemic, I’m the witness, I’m the whistleblower. So these are all the problems I pointed out for the first time in the world, both in English and Chinese word since January 2020 and also when I escaped to the US in April 2020, I also went to the public media and talk about the issues and submit evidence to the US agencies. Now I would say that I’m so happy to say the US government launched such strong rejection against the WHO’s ambition and also not only who’s actually it is communist China behind it? Because Chinese Communist Party clearly want to use this amendment to promote AIDS anti Covid experience all over the world and use all these fancy word to wrap up their crucial anti human measures and as well as all this kind of surveillance and also violates the human rights actions to control all of us. There is no doubt you see that from both statements.

11:50 Li-Meng Yan: We can see they realize that and they reject that thoroughly. So for China this is a big loose because it has spent over 5 years try to reach to the top level using who to reshape the sons, reshape their power to influence people. And you know, I see that both statements actually has emphasized again and again that it’s about sovereignty. It’s. It’s not only about that one policy or two policies.

12:24 Li-Meng Yan: They basically in the amendment I read through that you will see there is no space to discuss any possibility when you face the next pandemic or next so called pandemic. It could be a fake pandemic which means nothing happened. But they just want to restrict you at home. It’s up to who I mean. And then there is no space to talk about the man made pandemic or misinformation. Because you have to listen to their unified narrative and how they make this unified narrative. Basically it’s like what you see from. From nature, science, from the all this kind of pro China and profochi per who scientist or media outlet. They will give you a narrative and that is the only unified narrative in the world when you meet the next pandemic. Basically what it means, it means I checked the amendment, I checked who’s explanation.

13:33 Li-Meng Yan: That means image China. Once this amendment get effect next week, next Monday after our broadcast on air, then think about Xi Jinping wanna release a new virus. Okay, no matter what this virus is, for example, it could be the chickenpox. Chickenpox virus. We know that many of people have the immunity, right? But it doesn’t matter. They could do the gain function or whatever. They release it. Okay, that’s a scenario. And then who will announce oh, there will be a pandemic.

14:13 Li-Meng Yan: Why? Because it can transmit right? Human infection will happen and of course people will die. If without like the promote treatment or people will easily get infected because you don’t have enough immunity, then they will promote immediately all these vaccines, all the mandate policies, vaccine ID and China’s traffic light id. Either you get contact with some other suspicious patients or not, it doesn’t matter.

14:52 Li-Meng Yan: Your phone will download these kind of apps like how Chinese people did during the pandemic you have to gather apps and I can tell you back to China, one person can have several different traffic light apps in their phone. Why? Because some from the state level, some from the province level, some from the city level. Yeah, there are multiple. And then they will suddenly tell you, oh, from today, from this moment, you and your family have to be restricted at home or be falsely sent to the isolation camp, which they called it the hospital.

15:32 Li-Meng Yan: Why? Because they will tell you that when you take the subway back home today and within one hour there was a patient in the same subway station, you will say ah, I was there one hour later than him while why I would be quarantined now doesn’t matter because they called it as a time space interaction. Yeah, that’s some kind of words they developed. They believe that within one hour you have some interaction with that guy in the same space. And so the space could be very large like the big train station, like New York Central Station.

16:12 Li-Meng Yan: Doesn’t matter. The thing is they believe you need to be quarantined and then you lose all your human rights. Yeah, of course. Back to China, we have seen that people are hungry to die at home and no one is allowed to give them food or no one even care about them all. The pregnant lady can’t go to the hospital and she has to deliver the baby in the street, in public because she has no traffic light green to enter the hospital.

16:41 Li-Meng Yan: Oh yeah, that’s true. It happened in China and whatever. I mean these kind of terrible things will be applied to everyone all over the world following this amendment. And yes, you could say that something so terrible, I don’t think it will happen. Okay, so if you don’t think it happened, that means you rarely trust who you really trust, the Chinese government. And you need to think about why they spent five years to push this amendment. And back to 2022, I can tell you that they failed once. The 2022 version appendment was bankrupted, that didn’t pass who countries voting. But now suddenly the 2024 version come out just a few weeks ago I believe. And then quickly they will force you to by default accept it.

17:41 Li-Meng Yan: So that’s why say the public official statement from the US government is such a huge fight back. And I believe that Trump administration really learned lessons from the pandemic and they know that if they allow this amendment to be accepted, then there will be further similar amendments or even worse, disaster happened to the United States and all over the world. So before I continue the explanation and Dr. Hu, what would you like to provide to our audience like I remember told me that how this amendment was failed in 2022 and other information you have collected.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:18:32\] SPK_3: Yes, thank you for having me here. First, I like to inform our audience that actually this is not a new. This pandemic treaty or you can say agreement has been introduced years ago. But initially many countries saw the original form of that pandemic agreement and they are saying no, we won’t accept that even included the Britain United Britain United Kingdom. The Britain said that this is the current form.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:19:07\] SPK_3: It’s not respect to the sovereignty. So they did what they call some change or you can say amendment and make some word rigors and very hard to understand and make those some mandatory become recommendations like the digital passport and the medical ID and the forced the intellectual property weaver for the vaccine. These kind of things. But the thing is the core never change. The core is to force you to hand out your local policy right Making policy right and basically is forcing you to take in certain share of your public medical storage and using the name of the equity forcing you to share some of that to the what they call the global good.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:20:19\] SPK_3: But the thing is who is controlling this is always a problem. Now they say oh, it’s who is something unbiased. But we all know who is never unbiased. They have is under the pressure and influenced by the Chinese Communist Party. And it has been proved that the Dr. Yan Dr. Yan was in the reference lab of the WHO and their job is to monitor the outbreak of the disease.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:20:54\] SPK_3: But when did it happen? On the mainland China under the control of the communist. This system is broken. It doesn’t happen. So what this tells us if this is the lesson, what we can learn from this lesson is no matter how well how beautiful this agreement are, it can only work on those countries who respect and recognize that. \[00:21:22\] SPK_3: Let’s see the US or the UK or the Japan or the Australia. But for those we can say that global bad actors this those kind of rules can never work on them. That means they can benefit from this system and you will be the one lose control. And those countries who don’t recognize and respect this agreement will benefit from this. So the key point is for this kind of the globalism recommended systems they can give you a recommendation.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:22:07\] SPK_3: But the problem there for the local government they don’t have other source of the recommendation to counteract them. So if even they said lockdown is just a recommendation. But imagine if you are the mayor as the pandemic period who give you a recommendation lockdown. But you don’t have other source to counteract them. So what are going to happen? \[00:22:36\] SPK_3: You cannot continue that lockdown because if you don’t do that, you’re going to have a huge responsibility. But if you did that, you follow that recommendation, you can waive off the responsibility. So basically your only choice to follow their recommendation. Even they say I and I didn’t enforce you to do that. It’s kind of the hidden force.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:23:04\] SPK_3: So that is the point. This is because the who have a very good authority that the people trust them. But the problem is we know that they are not the people we can trust. Because this communist system is not assembled by a like minded nation. They assembled by warrants of the nation that many of them never will agree or respect. \[00:23:36\] SPK_3: This agreement like communist China, it has been approved. Dr. Yen’s whistleblower movement already proved that. So Dr. Yang tells their supervisor that there is a pandemic is going on and you have to let who do something. But who refused to do that and tried to warn Dr. Yan do not cross the red line.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:24:04\] SPK_3: So if this alert system is not even work in previous pandemic, how should we trust this system will work in future pandemic system? And they are not only they never recognize, they never admit they made a mistake, they never did reform. Dr. Terror is not getting down. They continue at that position and they get reward. They try to get more money and more power from the mistakes they made.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:24:45\] SPK_3: They didn’t say, they never admitted that oh, what we did is not correct. Last time we’re gonna did a series of the reform to make this system work better and we gain the trust from the US and other country. They didn’t do that. Instead they said we want a bigger power. We wonder more money. \[00:25:10\] SPK_3: You should give me more support. And from their pandemic agreement you can say that their focus is still on the what they call is pathogen collection system. So they have a special term on that it called the pathogen pandemic pathogen collection system. And that system is basically agreement to allow people to share the pathogens what they call these pandemic potential. That means those pathogens never caused a pandemic or even an epidemic.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:25:54\] SPK_3: But we should treat them as a pandemic potential and collect it in a digital form and share with many other people. And those people, you never know they are in a good intention or not. Let’s suppose that the communist China they still get those digital form alpha estrogen and they use the synthetic method to regain the life of those. The dendrite pathogen in their own lab and do the modification and causing a real pandemic and they can play all this to those poor country maybe in Africa who donated those pathogen sequencing. So I think before we figure out or with fully confidence that all countries who in this system are like minded and trustable, we should treating this kind of the globalism system carefully or cautiously before we donate all those medicines and vaccines we should know where those things go and whether it goes to this country who like minded us and treating us equally.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:27:13\] SPK_3: And also before we fear those pandemic potential pathogens, we should know whether other parts who can get access to this system are worth our trust. And before we invest a lot into digging all the more pathogens who has a pandemic potential, we should know those people who work on site are trustable. Okay, let’s have a short break. We will come back to continue this topic. Thank you.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:27:46\] SPK_4: Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go? But all the energy and protein bars are just too sweet and full of sugar, preservatives and mystery ingredients. Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary. Bear Bars are a crunchy, savory bar made from just six simple natural ingredients made with veggies, nuts and seeds. Bear Bars are plant based, organic, gluten free, contain 6 grams of protein and are low temp dried for a unique crunch.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:28:09\] SPK_4: To learn more just visit bearbar.com outloud and get the exclusive discount just for America Out Loud listeners. That’s B E A r b a. \[00:28:18\] SPK_5: R.com/outloud struggling with your health, energy and constantly feeling hungry? Want to save money on the rising cost of groceries and dramatically improve your health? Go to chemicalfreebody.com outloud today get nature’s super multivitamin doctor formulated green 85 juice formula empower your immune system. Cut your grocery bill and save 20% on your first order.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:28:43\] SPK_6: Your heart is crucial. Are you supporting it as you age? Try the Wellness Company’s Healthy Heart Formula with Taurine D ribose and coenzyme Q10. Designed by Dr. Peter McCullough, Healthy Heart helps boost heart function and support cardiac strength. Get 20% off your first order plus free shipping at TWC Health outloud with code Outloud. \[00:29:04\] SPK_1: Well, I challenge you to find a broader array of great voice, a deeper bench of experience or a more dedicated collection of passionate patriots than here on AmericaOutloud News. Now is our time my fellow Americans. AmericaOutloud News, Liberty and justice for all.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:29:32\] SPK_3: Hi everyone. Welcome. Welcome back to the voice of Dr. Yan. We’ve just talked about that the State Department of U.S. and the HHS have signed the John Statement to reject the WHO 2024amendment to International Health Regulation 2005. So let’s see that in the last section. Dr. Hu and I have shared our opinions on the significant rejection and you may wonder what exactly written in this amendment do they clearly mention?

30:06 Li-Meng Yan: That oh, we deny any possibility of lab origin. We deny of weaponization responsibility. We promote vaccine mandates or digital id. Now actually I read through this amendment which is almost 70 pages. It doesn’t clearly or we should say doesn’t directly mention these specific terms. However, through structure and terminological analysis we can still identify several key provisions whose essence amounts closely to the strategies promoted by the Chinese Communist party during the COVID 19 pandemic, namely the nature origin narrative, information monopoly, vaccine policies and institutionalization of global health surveillance. So there are at least five categories of provisions in the amendment strongly aligned with CCP narrative. The first one avoiding lab origin accountability and the virus weaponization responsibility. So when we see the articles 1 and 12 concerning the definition and activation mechanism of public health emergency of international concern, it says employees vogue terms such as may constitute a public health risk and may require a coordinated international response. It entirely omits any mention of virus origin investigation, weather caused by human activity or involving harmful laboratory leaks.

31:57 Li-Meng Yan: And also it emphasizes coordinated response, resource mobilization and global action while remaining silent on accountability. So this effectively provides a liability shield for future lab origin viruses, discourages identifying responsible parties and makes publicly condemning CCP labs virtually impossible. Secondly, it strengthens control over information narratives. In the new Article 44 it mandates to build and strengthen risk communication and community engagement systems and capacities, including for countering false or misleading information and disinformation. So clearly it targets misinformation but in practice often used to suppress narratives that contradict WHO or government approved messaging and institutionalize the censorship practices used during the pandemic, for example suppression of lab origin and also CCP’s no mobile bioweapon and unrestricted warfare like the iridescent claims I provided widespread all over the media and social media.

33:22 Li-Meng Yan: So it shifts legitimacy of the information war on truth from free expression to centralized official censorship. Certainly it promotes centralized vaccine distribution and equitable access access mechanisms. In the article 13a it mentioned equitable access to health products. It requires that during pandemic there be equitable and affordable access to vaccines, medicines, diagnostics. Granting WHO greater coordination authority while presented as equity aid empowers WHO as a global hub for vaccine and medical resource allocation may be exported by CCP to gain priority access to vaccine formulas, raw materials or technical support while suppressing punitive actions for its cover up.

34:25 Li-Meng Yan: And Also it mirrors CCP’s tactic during COVID 19 using the COVID vaccine mechanism to interwind vaccine diplomacy with immunity from responsibility. Fourth, it implied the foundation for digital health surveillance in Annex 1 updated core capacity requirements. It explicitly requires States to have the capacity for handling documentation related to travelers and to receive, access and use acceptable health documents. Though it doesn’t explicitly mention digital ID or vaccine passports, this provision lays the groundwork for a global health certification system including digital health credentials. The CCP has long pushed for internationalization of its health code vaccine QR system, and this clause provides a legitimized entry point for such a global rollout.

35:35 Li-Meng Yan: Fifth, the expansion of Director General’s discretionary powers and Pandemic Declaration authority. The new definition Pandemic Emergency authorized the WHO Direct General to declare a pandemic emergency without consent from Member States and to initiate global coordination efforts. The grant the non elected international bureaucrats the power to trigger global lockdowns, broader controls, resource relocation and speech restrictions. It closely mirrors the CCP’s authoritarian centralized crisis response model and it embeds national sovereignty into WHO’s command and control framework, forming a de facto Global Bio emergency chain of comment with CCP influence deeply embedded. If you have listened to the previous episode of the voice of Dr. Yan back to 2023 we have explained a lot that how CCP implanted their puppet into WHO as the Director General since 2003 and of course Dr. Tedros is a communist from Ethiopia.

36:59 Li-Meng Yan: You know that when he Xi Jinping it looks like he meets the superior king in the world, right? So in summary, although the language of this amendment appears technical and using terms like public health cooperation and neutrality and basically it’s really CCP styled fancy words like how they talk about love and happy and also serve for people and peace. All the things for Chinese people we know that is nonsense and when they tell you this kind of fancy words you know what they want is totally opposite. So its structure logic is deeply aligned with CCP strategic architecture and what CCP want is denial of man made and weaponized virus origin and they want the information monopoly they need the vaccine power diplomacy they want promote digital health surveillance, export and they definitely need to bypass democratic oversight and all the things provided by this amendment. So you see that the core nature of this amendment is not merely a technical public health document, but a blueprint for a global authoritarian architecture, one that attempts to record sovereignty, truth, freedom, science and democracy.

38:31 Li-Meng Yan: Under the guise of pandemic preparedness, if not explicitly rejected, the US and other sovereign nations risk being re locked and the next engineered crisis into a global health governance trap long infiltrated and manipulated by the CC repeating a cycle of truth suppressed people confound and authoritarianism whitewashed. America’s rejection of this amendment makes a historic break into that claim. So Dr. Hu, what do you want to add to our audience based on this part of explanation?

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:39:18\] SPK_3: Hi. So I think you are right that we should pay attention to this and it is really matter. Because although President Trump has already withdraw the US from the WHO system, but we have to understand even that withdrawal happened somehow the US still hooked by that regulation. That means if Senator sorry if the Secretary Kennedy didn’t officially opt out or deny that proposal, US still have to pay certain portion and to prepare the budget to support that regulation. That is first thing.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:40:04\] SPK_3: And even worse, if the US do a part of that PABS system that is just what I mentioned. It’s a pandemic pathogen collection system. You still need to pay for that and you still need to share that pandemic potential pathogens. And that is the point. I think it is very important for all of us. \[00:40:30\] SPK_3: Because that means the pandemic origin confusion will lead to the future dysfunction of the prevalentness. Why all this proposal from the WHO is all focused on the nature origin. There is zero. Nothing is prepared for the laboratory, especially for the man made intentionally pandemic. That means all these resources are poured into the nature origin.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:41:06\] SPK_3: And you still who this regulation still consider every actors in that WHO system is like minded and they are very kindly to each other, should be fully trustable with each other. But this presumption is not right. We have already proved that in previous pandemic. So if now we continue on this and pouring on the taxpayers money into a system that is sharing all the passengers that could elicit another pandemic with all those no matter it’s good or bad actors we didn’t distinguish and there is no responsibility for misconduct using those pathogen consequence sequence. If they used what and they transferred to some terrorist organization or some like the CCP misuse them, they have no consequence.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:42:17\] SPK_3: So what’s the point of pushing this rule if this rule doesn’t benefit us? If this route doesn’t learn any lesson from previous pandemic, what is porn keep pouring raw resources into this system. And what I have to point out this PABS system, that pathogen sharing system, not only digging out more pathogens all across the world and zone are not sharing that in physical form, they are sharing that in digital form. That means in future CCP China not even need to deploy their military personnel into Africa. In future WHO team gonna have to go to the local and collect the passengers, sequence them and upload to the database and what CCP military personnel is just need to pretend themselves into civilian scientists just like Yi Gangtong and join the WHO get access to that database claiming they have such a pandemic potential situation and they want to have all this pathogen information related and they will have those information.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:43:47\] SPK_3: Who gonna monitor that? I don’t think there’s any person gonna monitor them. So even we know they are doing something bad and we require them to release all the sensitive information. We already know that CCP give nothing to the who they gonna refuse you to get access to their local database. So without correction on that part, I think keep continuing on Sharing more pathogen to the CCP is not reasonable at all.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:44:27\] SPK_3: And keep sharing the latest technology wisdom is not even not reasonable. So I think we should really reconsider this and I think this is great idea to stop this. It is not about us is not interested in intellectual collaboration. It is about we have to reform the karma system to make sure it can benefit us before we join and start collaboration. That’s my point.

Li-Meng Yan: \[00:44:57\] SPK_3: Thank you. Thank you. Dr. Hu. Yes. You mentioned that CCP will use these amendments classes to get access to all the pathogens collected everywhere in the world for free and use it to study their bioweapons. Actually China has been using this way to get pathogens all over the world for many years. For example, during the Ebola pandemic, China sent their military virologist and bioweapon researchers to Africa. They work with civilian doctors from China and that’s called anti Iboga outbreak. And then they bring the samples to bring the pathogen back to China to study. And also like when I work in the University of Hong Kong WHO reference lab, my colleagues will be sent to Africa to do some like the annual or like occasionally this kind of of exchange to help them identify the pathogens there. And also the data could be bring back to China.

46:07 Li-Meng Yan: And so altogether, I mean China has done this for long, but still now they want to make it more officially because they know that in the pandemic trying to connect the bat virus everywhere. And this become one of the evidence that people start realize, oh yeah, you study bat coronavirus everywhere for years and you collect them. And then finally outbreak happened in Wuhan near the Virology lab. So that shows clearly China is responsible. So CCP doesn’t want it happen next time because they like the perfect crime how to do that.

46:50 Li-Meng Yan: That is by making this officially approved by who. Every country needs to work together and for CCP they just need to show they collaborate with those labs. And also because WHO ask the countries to share their data and China want to donate their academic resources to help develop anti pandemic future pandemic countermeasures. So they could have different countries collect these samples and then just give it submitted to WHO and let China get it for free and then you won’t next time blame the so called pandemic to Chinese government because China can say oh, this time it is Ebola. The similar string originally outbreak in Kango that time it is some kind of virus originally happened from maybe Latino America.

47:56 Li-Meng Yan: And we just did our help to help to figure out how to develop the countermeasures. So you all need to appreciate our efforts. And you cannot blame China at all because this is natural origin and we didn’t collect the samples all over the world. We didn’t go to get bats everywhere. We just sit in our labs. And your countries shared using your taxpayers money to collect the data and shared with us. See this will make next pandemic more difficult to be revealed. Because if you read through the amendment you will see China has done its best to prevent like every weakness will show their truth of the weaponized program and their unrestricted biowarfare and their criminal actions. Because I’m the whistleblower so I know how I review them. And when I see this amendment, basically it goes to close every opportunity that next Dr. Yan would come out to to be the whistleblower.

49:19 Li-Meng Yan: And also when we say that this whole amendment so it completely avoid addressing the possibility of the pandemic caused by gain function research passaging weaponization or unreasonable restricted by warfare. And in effect it gave CCP a green light to engineer another global outbreak and use it to control the world. Because I further say what they said it entirely when I read through the amendment entirely avoids any reference to gain of function research, passaging weaponization, lab accident or biological warfare, unrestricted warfare induced pandemics. But we know that in the past five years all the evidence we got pointed out to the release virus, weaponized virus from the Chinese lab and the Chinese celebrating the victory of this biowarfare in the unrestricted warfare. So you see that.

50:32 Li-Meng Yan: So they even not mention gain of function. But President Trump has launched the banking of function executive order in May Right. So this is totally ignoring the what happened in the U.S. the U.S. government tried its best to improve the regulation and also the surveillance of gain of function. I mean Trump administration has done a lot more than the gain of function ban. They also have another EO that is about the reconstruct the golden standard of science.

51:08 Li-Meng Yan: It also published at the end of May. So both together it actually consistent with what I reviewed back to 2020 how Chinese Communist Party using of function to weaponize the bad Coronavirus DC 45 and DXC 21 by military and civilian project and make it become COVID 19 virus. And also I revealed in the yen reports that CCP work with Peter D work with like the Mindset Nature Sciences kind of magazines and also with NI AIDS a lot of compromised scientists and help so make the nature origin narrative spread all over the world even become dominant for a while. Right. So all these things you see Trump administration realize what happened and they start to do little by not detail by data.

52:04 Li-Meng Yan: We should say step by step to fix this problem. And also even White House issued a statement telling that China will be held held accountable for the COVID 19 pandemic. Even though they didn’t mention they will force China to do that. But it implies and you see even the tariff war against China actually is to weaponize the tariff to push the US allies separate decoupled from the CCP and come into US campaign. And because the U.

52:42 Li-Meng Yan: S has already officially announced that China is life threat. This it never happened in the U S history. And this threat you see the U. S military is mobilizing and doing the military exercise. Because they know if you don’t do something China will become more aggressive. And Chinese Communist Party Xi Jinping regime their ultimate goal is not Taiwan. It’s not the next pandemic. It is to destroy the United States. And the United States dominated other all over the world. So the thing is the amendment not mentioned gain of function, not mentioned about weapon passaging weaponization not mention even like leak though we know it’s not accident.

53:33 Li-Meng Yan: And it doesn’t mention state actors engineering pandemics even for the biosafety things. They just vogly have some word. So that’s why it serves as green light for CCP’s unrestricted bioweapon doctrine. You see, you don’t do anything to stop CCP engineer highly transmissible virus next time or pathogens vehicle function and also WHO is controlled to suppress information and push nature origin narrative. And also the who’s director like Dr. Taddor always chosen by CCP and controlled by them because as I told you, our whistleblower said CCP will veto to other any other candidate if they are not controlled by ccp.

54:28 Li-Meng Yan: So altogether you see it even provides tactical legitimacy mechanism that CCP can use all the things step by step in this amendment. Basically it is a global governance trap that doesn’t enforce accountability, doesn’t implement the safeguards, but inside instead expands power and legitimizes abuse. So that’s why it’s not designed to prevent the next pandemic. It’s designed to create a more controllable framework for managing another Covid style disaster. It shares origin accountability, diverse international scrutiny, centralized narrative control and legalizes digital surveillance truth.

55:18 Li-Meng Yan: And the CCP is currently the most capable, most motivated and least ethically constrained regime to take advantage of this framework. So finally, before we end this episode, I will say that this amendment is not meant to stop the next pandemic. It’s meant to legitimize the next global cover up. It serves regions like CCP with labs, propaganda machines and international narrative agents by providing a health geopolitical weaponization blueprint. The US rejection of this amendment is the only correct and necessary strategic severance.

56:06 Li-Meng Yan: And also if other nations fail to wake up, the risk risk being blackmailed, misled and silenced once again in the next biological crisis. So we need to let people know what happened and we want people to let more people know what happened. Because since they are using who to silence us, we must stand up to fight against them. Okay, thank you for making listening to the voice of Dr. Yan. Every Saturday and Sunday we will meet you on air at 8pm Eastern time on a Mark out Loud Radio network as well as iHeartRadio.

56:46 Li-Meng Yan: And after that we will meet you on various apps for free like Pandora, Spotify and Apple Podcast.