Trump’s Cheap-Beef Push Opens a Rift With His Rancher Base

Trump’s Cheap-Beef Push Opens a Rift With His Rancher Base
Donald Trump’s bid to make hamburgers cheaper has put him on a collision course with a constituency that has long been among his most loyal: American cattle ranchers.

On Friday, Trump said the administration would temporarily admit up to 300,000 metric tons of lean beef trimmings for ground-beef production without out-of-quota tariffs. The planned 90-day waiver is meant to ease prices that reached an average $6.89 a pound in July, while the U.S. cattle herd sits near a decades-long low.

The White House says foreign exporters have agreed to sell the beef at a 25% discount, and Trump argued the move would give consumers relief while leaving room for the domestic herd to recover. An executive order formalizing the policy is expected within two weeks. But the announcement exposes an awkward trade-off: an administration known for tariffs is now seeking cheaper foreign supply because domestic supply cannot quickly meet demand.

Ranchers and their Republican allies say that remedy could aggravate the underlying shortage. “We all want lower grocery prices,” Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska said, “but … we cannot do it at the expense of American producers.” Sen. Tim Sheehy of Montana said Trump’s “heart is in the right place,” but warned imports would hurt ranching families.

Cattle groups made the same case more bluntly. National Cattlemen’s Beef Association chief Colin Woodall said flooding the market with subsidized, below-market beef “is not the way to rebuild the American cattle herd.” R-CALF USA’s Bill Bullard argued that more imports would further discourage herd expansion.

Economists question whether the policy can deliver the promised price drop. Kansas State’s Glynn Tonsor said 300,000 metric tons is roughly 3% of annual U.S. consumption — “pretty small” in relative terms — while Texas A&M’s David Anderson questioned whether exporters could redirect that volume so quickly. Economist Steve Hanke framed the dispute as a tariff lesson: with supply shrinking, he said, tariffs are ultimately “a tax on American consumers.”

Continue reading https://foxvector.com/stories/01a0274d-48df-1100-729e-2ccacaa9accb