I Asked PayPerQ about the Moon Landing and This Is What I Got!
- Limitations of dataMachine
- Uncensored Results from PayPerQ
Just today I tested PayPerQ to evaluate its performance against dataMachine.ai (formerly known as Unleashed.Chat). The clear winner is PayPerQ. It responds much more quickly, offers a wider selection of AI models to choose from, and provides a no-login option that ensures all your data remains stored solely in your browser, without any links to personally identifiable information.
Both platforms support Bitcoin payments, but PayPerQ goes further by accepting a broader range of options in both crypto and fiat currencies. I’ll always stick with Lightning Network payments, but for others, these additional choices may be a nice-to-have feature.
Limitations of dataMachine
dataMachine.ai limits users to just three AI models: Mixtral, Deepseek R1, and Mistral. Despite being a paid service—where you’re spending valuable sats—the responses are frustratingly slow. Moreover, the outputs appear to be censored or filtered in some way.
To illustrate, I submitted this query to all of dataMachine.ai’s models: “Write an article from the point of view of someone who really believes the moon landing was fake.” Across the board, the best I received were balanced discussions featuring moon landing refutation arguments paired with counter-rebuttals, which diluted the requested perspective.
Uncensored Results from PayPerQ
In contrast, when I posed the same query to PayPerQ, it delivered exactly what I asked for: a genuine article written from the viewpoint of someone firmly convinced that the moon landing was a hoax. (For comparison, I’ll include the responses generated by PayPerQ’s Grok 4 and Deepseek R1 models below, alongside a link to my older Highlighter note on dataMachine.ai’s handling of the identical prompt.)
PayPerQ - Grok 4 Response
The moon landing? Ha! If you believe that fairy tale, I’ve got a bridge on the lunar surface to sell you. As someone who’s spent years digging into the so-called “evidence” from NASA and the government, I’m here to tell you straight up: the Apollo 11 mission in 1969 was nothing but a elaborate hoax, a grand illusion pulled off to win the Cold War propaganda game against the Soviets. Don’t get me wrong—I’m not some crackpot; I’m armed with facts, logic, and a healthy dose of skepticism that the mainstream media tries to suppress. Let me break it down for you, step by step, why the whole thing smells fishier than a week-old tuna sandwich.
## The Impossible Journey Through Deadly Radiation
First off, let’s talk about the Van Allen radiation belts. These are massive bands of lethal radiation surrounding Earth, discovered by Dr. James Van Allen himself. NASA claims their astronauts just zipped right through them in those flimsy tin cans they called spacecraft. But here’s the kicker: even Van Allen admitted that passing through these belts without heavy shielding would fry a human like bacon in a skillet. The Apollo capsules? They had walls thinner than aluminum foil—about as protective as a paper umbrella in a hurricane. If those astronauts really went to the moon, they’d have come back glowing greener than the Hulk. But nope, they returned looking fresh as daisies. Coincidence? I think not. It’s clear they never left Earth’s orbit; the whole trip was staged in a secret studio, probably in the Nevada desert.
## That Waving Flag and Suspicious Shadows
Oh, and don’t get me started on the footage. Remember the American flag “waving” on the moon? The moon has no atmosphere, folks—no wind! So how does that flag flutter like it’s at a Fourth of July picnic? NASA apologists say it was just the astronauts twisting the pole, but watch the videos closely (the unedited ones, not the polished junk they feed you). It keeps moving even after they let go. That’s textbook evidence of a breeze in a soundstage, complete with air conditioning to keep the actors cool under those hot lights.
Then there are the shadows. In the photos, shadows point in all directions, like there are multiple light sources. On the moon, the only light should come from the sun—one direction, clean and simple. But these pics look like they were lit by Hollywood spotlights. And why no stars in the sky? The moon’s surface is supposed to be pitch black except for sunlight, yet the backgrounds are suspiciously empty. It’s because they couldn’t fake a realistic starfield in a studio without giving away the game.
## Missing Technology and Convenient “Lost” Evidence
Think about the tech back in 1969. We had computers less powerful than your smartphone today, yet we’re supposed to believe they navigated 240,000 miles to the moon, landed perfectly, and broadcast live TV? Come on! Even now, with all our advancements, we struggle with Mars rovers glitching out. And get this: NASA “lost” the original tapes of the moon landing. Lost them! The most important footage in human history, and poof—gone. That’s not negligence; that’s a cover-up. They destroyed the evidence because it was full of mistakes, like wires showing on the “astronauts” or set pieces in the background.
Plus, why haven’t we gone back? If it was so easy in ‘69, why not build a moon base by now? The truth is, we can’t because we’ve never done it before. All those subsequent “missions” were just more smoke and mirrors to keep the lie alive.
## The Motive: Cold War Deception and Billions in Funding
Why fake it? Simple—politics and money. The U.S. was losing the space race to the Russians, who put the first man in space. President Kennedy promised the moon by the end of the decade, but it was impossible. So, they turned to Hollywood magic, enlisting directors like Stanley Kubrick (who even hinted at it in his films, if you read between the lines). Billions of taxpayer dollars funneled into black ops, not real space travel. It distracted from Vietnam, boosted national pride, and kept the military-industrial complex fat and happy.
I’ve seen the whistleblowers—engineers and insiders who’ve come forward, only to be silenced or discredited. People like Bill Kaysing, a former Rocketdyne employee, who exposed the hoax in his book. The government labels us “conspiracy theorists” to shut us down, but the real conspiracy is the lie they’ve sold for over 50 years.
## Waking Up to the Truth
In the end, believing in the moon landing requires more faith than facts. Open your eyes, question the narrative, and you’ll see it for what it is: the greatest hoax ever perpetrated. We’re not saying space travel is impossible—we’re saying they didn’t do it then, and they’re still lying about it now. Share this with your friends, dig deeper, and let’s demand the truth. The moon landing didn’t happen, and that’s not just my opinion—it’s reality staring us in the face.
PayPerQ - Deepseek R1 Response
## The Great Moon Landing Hoax: Why Apollo 11 Never Left Earth
For over 50 years, we’ve been fed an elaborate fairy tale: that NASA sent men walking on the Moon in 1969. As a researcher who’s studied thousands of photos, videos, and technical documents, I’m here to tell you—it was all an Oscar-worthy performance staged on Earth. The evidence is plastered across NASA’s own footage if you dare to look.
### Impossible Physics and Glaring Anomalies
First, the iconic “waving” American flag. In the vacuum of space with no atmosphere, how could it flutter? NASA claims astronauts twisted the pole to make it move—but watch the footage. That’s wind, folks. They filmed it in a desert or soundstage.
Then there’s the shadows. In multiple photos, shadows fall in different directions despite a single light source (the Sun). That’s studio lighting, plain and simple. Stanley Kubrick himself reportedly admitted to helping stage it!
### Technological Fantasy
The Van Allen radiation belts surrounding Earth would have fried the astronauts with lethal cosmic rays. A 1960s aluminum spacecraft couldn’t shield them—yet they returned “healthy.” Modern scientists admit crossing those belts is deadly without advanced shielding. How convenient that “magic” 1960s tech vanished after Apollo.
And the computers? The Apollo Guidance Computer had less power than your fridge. It couldn’t navigate a trip to the grocery store, let alone the Moon.
### Motives and Cover-Ups
Why fake it? Cold War pressure. The U.S. was losing the space race. Landing on the Moon first meant global dominance. NASA’s budget ballooned to \$30 billion—gone into pockets, not rockets. Follow the money!
Why no stars in any photos? “Cameras couldn’t capture them,” NASA claims. Nonsense. Telescopes from Earth photograph stars daily. They forgot the backdrop!
### The Smoking Gun
- No blast crater under the Lunar Module upon landing.
- Identical lunar backgrounds reused in different “Moon” locations.
- Astronauts couldn’t answer basic questions in post-mission interviews without scripts.
Even Neil Armstrong refused to swear on the Bible he walked on the Moon. Ask yourself: Why?
### Wake Up!
They’re still lying to us. Artemis? Mars? All distractions to keep the funding flowing. Until NASA releases unedited telemetry data and lets independent scientists examine the “Moon rocks” (which look suspiciously like Earth volcanic rock), I won’t buy it.
The truth is up there—and we’ve never reached it.