Cheap Drones Force Western Militaries to Rethink Costly Defenses

Cheap Drones Force Western Militaries to Rethink Costly Defenses
The central calculation is stark: a basic Russian drone can cost about $12,000, while NATO forces may use missiles priced at €400,000 to destroy it. Factoring in fighter fuel and maintenance widens that imbalance, according to one account of the procurement shift.

From this perspective, the problem is not simply whether Western air defenses can stop drones, but whether they can do so repeatedly in a long conflict without depleting costly stocks. Saturation attacks can force defenders to spend sophisticated weapons against relatively simple aircraft made from inexpensive materials.

The emerging answer is a layered approach rather than a single replacement for high-end systems. Patriot batteries would be reserved for missiles and more complex threats, while smaller drones would be met with electronic warfare, guns, rockets and low-cost interceptors. The United States is pursuing equipment such as the Bumblebee V2 interceptor, priced below $10,000, while the $35,000 LUCAS drone reflects the same emphasis on volume and lower operating costs.

European efforts point in the same direction, though with different tools. Britain has agreed to produce the Ukrainian-designed Octopus interceptor, described as costing roughly 10% of the target it destroys and updated every six weeks. France, meanwhile, has adapted Rafale jets to fire laser-guided rockets costing about $25,000, compared with MICA missiles that can reach $2 million each.

The common goal is to preserve premium missiles for threats that require them while building an industrial capacity to produce thousands of simpler defensive systems quickly. The account says NATO plans to invest $40 billion in such lower-cost technologies.

https://brazil-test-hub.syndichain.com Brazil News Hub brazil-test-hub brazil-test-hub