Meta Ordered to Pay $25 Billion to New Mexico in Data-Privacy Case
A facts-only brief, written by a local AI model from this article in The Wall Street Journal, October 21, 2026. It may contain mistakes, and it is not the article: the full story is at wsj.com.
A New Mexico judge ordered Meta Platforms to pay the state $25 billion on Wednesday, following a jury verdict that found the company violated state unfair practices laws. Judge Francis Mathew determined that Meta deceived users regarding data privacy, hate speech moderation, and the handling of the Cambridge Analytica breach over a period exceeding ten years. The jury identified approximately 44 million violations based on public statements made by the company and its executives, including Mark Zuckerberg. While the state’s attorney argued the penalty should reflect the value of the company’s stock, Meta’s legal team contended the amount was unconstitutional and disproportionate to any proven harm.
Background
- The lawsuit, filed in 2021, alleged that the Cambridge Analytica scandal was part of a broader pattern of misleading consumers about privacy and content moderation.
- New Mexico declined to join a $17 billion multistate settlement earlier this year that resolved similar consumer-protection claims in 48 other states.
- This ruling is the second verdict New Mexico secured against Meta this year, following an August order for a $942 million payment related to child safety and mental health claims.
- The state plans to seek additional court orders requiring Meta to implement platform changes based on the jury’s findings.
Read the full article at wsj.com
More from Wednesday, October 21:
Write a comment