Breaking Free: Deprogramming State Dependence
- Understanding the programming
- Why theory falls short
- The counterintuitive cure
- Practical pathways out
- Why most will hold back
- The path forward
The question lingers after every critique of state power: can people escape? Or has the conditioning run too deep, the programming too thorough, the dependency too entrenched?
The answer matters more than the diagnosis. Recognizing the cage is worthless if you remain permanently inside it.
Psychologist Martin Seligman spent decades studying this question, though he framed it differently. In 1967, he discovered learned helplessness: dogs exposed to inescapable electric shocks stopped trying to escape even when escape became possible. They had learned that their actions produced no change. The outcome was independent of what they did.
The parallel to state education, welfare dependency, and regulatory capture is obvious. Seligman’s discovery fifty years later inverted the mechanism entirely.
Passivity is the default, unlearned response to prolonged aversive stimulation. What must be learned is control. The brain’s baseline assumption is that control is absent. Agency must be demonstrated through action, built up through experience.
This changes everything about how to escape state dependence.
Understanding the programming
State schooling produced helplessness by design.
After Napoleon crushed Prussia at Jena in 1806, philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte advocated a new education system with an explicit goal: destroy individual free will to create obedient subjects. The Volksschulen deliberately discouraged reading and independent thought among peasant children. Horace Mann imported this model to Massachusetts in the 1850s, where it spread into American compulsory education.
John Taylor Gatto, named New York State Teacher of the Year in 1991 after thirty years in the system, documented what schools teach: confusion through incoherent information, acceptance of class position, indifference to everything, emotional and intellectual dependency, provisional self-esteem requiring constant external validation, and submission to surveillance.
The evidence suggests it works. Before compulsory education, Massachusetts literacy stood at 98 percent. After implementation, it topped out at 91 percent. Schools succeeded in training.
Recent academic research by Agustina Paglayan confirms what the system’s architects stated plainly: public schools were created to suppress dissent and indoctrinate obedience. The confusion of schooling with education is itself evidence the programming worked.
Twelve years of this conditioning produces adults who struggle to conceive of alternatives. The inability to imagine building roads privately, educating children at home, trading on voluntary terms, or securing wealth outside banking systems is evidence the indoctrination succeeded, full stop.
But Seligman’s research offers something useful: if control is learned, it can be learned. If agency must be demonstrated, it can be demonstrated.
Why theory falls short
The libertarian and cypherpunk movements have produced remarkable theory. Forty years of Austrian economics, anarcho-capitalist philosophy, and cryptographic innovation. The intellectual case against state power is complete, the tools exist, and the blueprints are drawn.
Yet the practical gains have been thin.
The problem is that understanding alone does cure learned helplessness. Reading Rothbard is necessary but insufficient. Watching lectures on Austrian economics is necessary but insufficient. Agreeing intellectually that taxation is theft while filing your 1040 changes nothing in the behavioral layer where helplessness lives.
Traditional cult deprogramming provides insight into why. Exit counselors use the Strategic Interactive Approach: patient questioning, presenting contradictions between ideology and reality, providing space for doubt, demonstrating care while challenging beliefs. The process works, sometimes, when families intervene with resources and professional help.
For state programming, almost everyone around you carries the same conditioning. Your family attended government schools. Your friends did too, your colleagues as well. There is no external vantage point from which to stage an intervention.
Self-directed deprogramming becomes both necessary and exceptionally difficult. The programming specifically prevents the first step. Learned helplessness manifests as inability to try even when escape is available. You know the cage door is unlocked, and you still cannot bring yourself to push it.
The cure is behavioral, not cognitive.
The counterintuitive cure
Seligman’s dogs could think their way out of helplessness in exactly the same way a person can think themselves into physical fitness: the thought helps with direction but accomplishes nothing by itself. Experimenters had to physically pick the dogs up and move their legs through the escape action. Once. Twice. After enough repetitions the dogs would jump on their own.
They did not need to understand the theory of operant conditioning. They needed to experience that their actions produced outcomes.
For humans recovering from cult involvement, therapists report a similar pattern. Knowing intellectually that the cult lied is a start. The person must then experience making a decision, seeing the result, and recognizing the connection between action and outcome. This happens through small steps: choosing what to wear, deciding what to eat, making a minor purchase independently. Each choice demonstrates agency. Each demonstration weakens the programming.
The same mechanism applies to state dependence.
You must act your way to independence. Each act of defiance, however small, teaches your brain that you have control. Each time you exercise agency and survive, the learned helplessness weakens.
This explains why decades of libertarian theory produced so little behavioral change. Theory is necessary for direction, insufficient for movement. A man lost in the desert needs both a map and the will to walk. The movement has provided excellent maps while leaving people paralyzed at the trailhead.
Samuel Edward Konkin III understood this. His counter-economics was a therapeutic strategy as much as a political one. By engaging in forbidden but peaceful trade, by trading risk for profit, by experiencing immediate self-liberation from state controls, the agorist demonstrates to himself that he can function outside state permission.
The act itself is the cure.
Practical pathways out
Multiple escape routes exist. Choose one that matches your circumstances and tolerance for risk, then start. Starting imperfectly beats waiting for perfect conditions.
Homeschooling and unschooling
Remove your children from state programming before it calcifies. Homeschoolers consistently outperform institutionally schooled children by five to ten years in ability to think independently. This happens because children learn by doing when freed from the system designed to teach helplessness.
The initial step terrifies most parents. They believe they lack certification, that college admissions will close, that they will fail. This is the programming talking. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Edison, and Andrew Carnegie attended no secondary school. They learned through apprenticeship, reading, and action.
You need to start. The fear is evidence the conditioning worked, evidence about your conditioning and nothing about your capacity.
Counter-economics and agorism
Konkin defined counter-economics as all peaceful human action forbidden by the state. Black markets, gray markets, forbidden trade, unlicensed services, tax avoidance, economic activity outside state sanction.
Begin small. Offer a service for cash. Trade goods peer-to-peer. Fix things for neighbors on a handshake. Accept cryptocurrency for work. Each transaction outside state surveillance demonstrates that voluntary exchange functions on its own merits.
The risk is real. Konkin acknowledged that counter-economics means trading risk for profit. Start with low-risk activities: skill trades among friends, cash transactions for small services, cryptocurrency for remittances. As competence grows, expand scope. The goal is demonstrating to yourself that you can produce value and exchange it directly.
Cryptocurrency and financial sovereignty
Bitcoin and privacy-focused cryptocurrencies enable holding wealth outside state-controlled banking systems. El Salvador’s adoption shows both the promise and difficulty: nation-state resources could force neither usage nor full accumulation.
Start with small amounts. Learn to generate keys, manage wallets, execute transactions. Experience sending value across borders on your own terms.
Each successful transaction rewires the learned helplessness. Securing wealth, transacting privately, operating outside the banking system: these are active demonstrations, proven through action.
The technology has rough edges, the user experience is poor, and the regulatory risk is real. These are reasons for caution, reasons to start small and learn continuously.
Self-directed learning
Reject credentialism. Skills can be acquired outside institutional approval.
Gatto documented that genius is common. What is rare is environments that do actively suppress it. The internet provides access to more educational resources than existed in all of human history before 1990: MIT OpenCourseWare, academic papers, tutorial videos, open source code, practice platforms.
What blocks learning is learned helplessness masquerading as need for formal instruction. “I cannot learn X without a class” is programming. People learned calculus from books for centuries before video lectures existed. They learned programming by reading code and trying things.
Choose a skill relevant to your goals. Find resources. Start practicing. Document progress publicly if you wish. Each incremental improvement demonstrates that you can acquire capability on your own initiative.
Physical autonomy
Reclaim your body from medical technocracy. Learn basic nutrition, exercise science, injury prevention. Doctors are essential for trauma and acute illness and largely superfluous for maintaining health.
The medicalization of normal human functioning is recent. People managed health, gave birth, recovered from illness, and died for all of human history until approximately 1950 with minimal professional supervision. Modern medicine offers real miracles for specific problems and also creates dependence where health requires only consistent practice.
Start with fitness. Strength training, cardiovascular health, flexibility, mobility: these are achievable with free information and consistent effort. Each month you remain healthy through your own practices demonstrates that you can manage your body.
Food production
Grow something. Even apartment dwellers can maintain herbs, sprouts, or small vegetables. Suburban residents can garden.
The goal is breaking the psychological dependence on industrial food systems. When you grow tomatoes, harvest them, prepare them, and eat them, you experience the connection between action and sustenance.
Most people in developed nations have produced no food. They have experienced food appearing in stores as if by magic. Growing food demonstrates the mechanism: it is knowledge and effort, both acquirable. A single plant proves the point.
Geographic arbitrage
If your country criminalizes independence, leave. Millions of people achieve partial sovereignty through perpetual travel or residence in jurisdictions with lighter state presence.
Digital work enables location independence for many professions. Cost of living differences mean you can work less while living better. Tax treatment varies by jurisdiction. Some countries forgo taxation of foreign-source income. Some have territorial systems. Some are less competent at enforcement.
The goal is escaping jurisdictions where every action requires permission, where building alternatives is criminalized, where independence is punished. Some places are better than others. Use that.
Building in public
Create things. Share them freely. Document the process. Accept no institutional affiliation.
Open source software development demonstrates that humans can coordinate complex projects with no hierarchy, ownership, or state involvement required. Wikipedia shows that knowledge can be compiled and maintained through voluntary contribution. Bitcoin proves that money can function with no central bank.
The act of building in public demonstrates agency. Each contribution proves you can create value. Each user or reader proves that value is recognized. Publishing and receiving voluntary engagement proves that your work has worth independent of authority’s validation.
Local parallel institutions
Food co-ops. Tool libraries. Skill shares. Homeschool co-ops. Repair cafes. Time banks. Cryptocurrency meetups. Any voluntary association that provides value outside state systems.
These exist in most cities already. Join them. If they are absent, start them. The barrier to entry is often just announcing a time and place.
Each interaction within parallel institutions demonstrates that humans can cooperate, exchange, learn, and provide for themselves directly. The programming says only the state can coordinate these functions. Participating in alternatives proves the programming wrong. This is especially effective because it is social: you encounter other people who have broken free or are breaking free. The isolation of learned helplessness is countered by community.
Why most will hold back
The obstacle is internal.
Learned helplessness manifests as inability to try. You know intellectually that you could homeschool, learn skills independently, grow food, build in public, join alternatives. You find yourself unable to start. The first step feels impossible.
The programming is working as designed.
Post-cult recovery literature describes “floating”: the person oscillates between cult and non-cult worldviews, unable to commit to either. They know intellectually the cult lied, but emotionally they hold on. The conditioning creates comfort in dependence. Independence feels dangerous even when all evidence points to the better path.
You will experience this. After reading this post, you will feel brief motivation followed by rationalization. “I would, but I have a mortgage.” “I would, but I have kids.” “I would, but the risk is too high.” “I would, but I need to understand more first.”
These are symptoms, not reasons.
The programming masquerades as prudence, responsibility, reasonable caution. It tells you to wait for better conditions, to research more, to plan carefully. It tells you that other people can act independently but your situation is uniquely constrained, that you will start soon but today is premature.
The cure is to notice it, name it, and act anyway. Pick the smallest possible step on any pathway that matches your current constraints. Do it today. Experience the result. Notice that you survived.
Then take the next small step.
The programming dissolves through repeated demonstrations that you have agency. Each action weakens it incrementally. The learned helplessness breaks over time. You stop waiting for authorities to solve problems. You stop believing you require permission.
This happens through doing.
The path forward
State dependence is learned helplessness applied to an entire population. The cure is the same as for individuals: demonstrate control through action.
The pathways exist: homeschooling, counter-economics, cryptocurrency, self-directed learning, physical autonomy, food production, geographic arbitrage, building in public, parallel institutions. Each has different risk profiles, requirements, and outcomes. Each breaks dependence through different mechanisms.
Choose one that fits your circumstances. Start today with the smallest possible step. Experience the result.
Then take the next step.
The programming will resist. You will feel fear, doubt, rationalization, paralysis. This is expected. It is evidence you are near the edge of the cage. The learned helplessness fights hardest when escape becomes possible.
Act anyway.
The state maintains power through the belief that you cannot function independently. Each act of independence disproves that belief. Agency demonstrated weakens the programming. Each small success makes the next attempt easier.
Free men built thirty thousand miles of roads. Free men created wealth, raised children, learned trades, conducted commerce, built tools, and lived lives through their own judgment for most of human history. You can do the same, because learned helplessness is a taught response, and taught responses can be unlearned.
Start now.
Where did I say that companies are the opposite of theft? I obviously don’t condone companies that steal. I’m saying there are countless companies that do not steal, while there is no single government which has not violated property of others. States apply autistic intervention (prohibition of consumption), binary intervention (direct theft like taxation or eminent domain), and autistic intervention (monopoly privileges forbidding Alice to heal Bob without a license). If you feel protected by the government, then maybe reread the above article again to help heal your Stockholm syndrom.
Haha, yes you didn’t say it, you wrote it. You are playing the cat and mouse game. Now you use the phrase defined by coercion instead of defined by theft. Ok. Before you defined companies as the opposite of being defined by theft, now you say they do steal, not defined by anything that binds them. Which is a pretty way to say, my company feels free to steal from you, which is surprisingly true! I am pretty sure you did not want to say that though, sadly. You then go on and say that the state that is defined by coercion (I suppose you mean the main characteristics of the state is capable to put someone in jail if condemned and to force you to pay taxes and to force you to give up medical store if you can’t produce a medical education). You certainly don’t mean, that the state has been formed by people because they were forced to produce a paper called constitution. Well the probably felt an obligation to protect its citizen, that’s some kind of coercion. You see, now I am becoming a cynic, because obviously you have chosen the cat and mouse tactics (yes I did say that, but truly i meant to say that), which has one meaning: You want to win an argument, no matter what. So i wish you farefell!
I didn’t say that companies dont steal, just that companies are not defined by coercion. The state clearly is. And often companies leverage and bribe the state to steal on their behalf, which is obviously bad. The root of the problem is the monopoly privileges of the state, companies misusing that is a consequence.
Property is derived from action and argumentation of humans, and scarce goods ought to be owned by the first appropriator. Voluntary contracts can be used to create companies, and as long as none or the participants steal I dont see any problem with that.
Swiss people would regain their prosperity, which is in decline for decades, if they’d get back to a peaceful life and mutual defense assurances, and get Bern out of their dealings.
First off, thank you, I appreciate a nice back and forth too, no matter the outcome, there is always something to gain from. I didn’t know that Lichtenstein could loose their citizen by vote. But I met some Lichtensteinians and I think they would never say something in their life anyway, being surrounded by mountains and living in the shadows all day long seems to have a lasting effect on them :-).
Now you said “defined by theft”, you are no socialist are you (i mean in the original sense, not the american, i hate you, you must be a socialist sense) - meaning you don’t define property as theft. Which makes some how sense by the way, since we all come naked onto earth in a random spot, with random dna, in a way all is given, the fact that you cant take anything into the afterlife, also makes the concept of owning difficult. I would much prefer stewardship over something, not ‘owning’.
But then you say something I thought I would here only in political parody. Did you really say companies are not defined by theft? You must be messing with me, goddamn you must live in heaven. Because here in switzerland we struggle to get the companies out of the state, because we believe they only want to plunder our taxes, that we use for education (we believe it is best we pay it and not some evil corp), railroads (we believe its best we pay it, or the let unlucrative places rot, and we don’t want ppl to migrate into the city and live in dull suburbs), healthcare (of course, the right to live, so basic we would never question that, we also have the right to switch our healthcare to any insurance company and they can’t deny our application, even if we are already on the tubes, with operation after operation planned), wellfare (dignity, give money, don’t ask, in the grand scheme it’s peanuts), translation into 5 languages, police, military, judicial, you know basic stuff that ensures, that the constitution is not only paper. By the way what constitution does a company have? Most use the one paper one voice method, which is neat, because you can always issue those papers (almost like printing money), and you can own those papers.
Since I believe your state (I am not totally sure, just a hunch) is probably already owned by companies, or lets say puppeteered, it’s no wonder you hate the state. I still think you should think about who is holding the keys. I think your societey lost the battle and gave over the keys already. Your only chance is what ghandy did, get your own salt by the sea. Fight the influence of the money back, in saying, nope we don’t need funding by company, we have taxes and we tax companies, because the owe society for the fact that we guarantee collectively, that investments are protected, that roads are built, hell, just for about everything.
Very nice reply!
You’re right that the state is not the only lier and thief, but it is an institution who is defined by theft, contrary to companies and individuals.
Switzerland is a good example, as it’s origins are a mutual defense treaty. Unfortunately it’s also on a declined, though slower than any country in the region.
Liechtenstein is another good example, a principality with the right to secede for every village. Originally the prince wanted to define this right for every family, but eventually he conceded to limiting it to villages. Still, that option to leave keeps everything in check.
Well it looks like you found something to fight agains - Conditioning by the state. I have no idea, why the social construct state should be the culprit of all, but I agree, that the state has an immense influence on its citizen. I also know that there are other entities (to say it very neutral) that have that very same influence on its consumers. There are story tellers amongst us who try to gather flocks and get them to pray. Parents leave a mark on their children, Landscape on the flora and fauna. I think it’s called the principle of cause and effect.
The fish are probably not meant to jump out of water and birds are happiest flapping in the sky. I am not sure whether it is a good idea to neglect my parents either. I told my children stories of a nice bearded man bringing poor children apples and walnuts when they needed it most - they seemed to like it, as did I - even though I don’t believe any of the rest of that cult that I happened to grow up in. Hell I got into school and made my way through it and thought: If school has made something very clear, than it’s this, that the world we live in is not organized according to reason, the very thing the school (high school) was trying to teach me. In the 80,90s in Switzerland they still did that. It’s still in the constitution of that state: The goal of education is a citizen, able to speak his own mind “mündiger Bürger”.
Of course the whole system now is more under pressure of the companies who started to disbelieve teachers and give them advice - swiss parliament is constantly surrounded by people who are affiliated either with companies or associations, that are well sponsored by companies. You could say, that companies are the constant voices in our country. There are a view politically influencial artists that are still in our national conscience (at least in the mind of older generations), even though they are dead - they told such things like “a society is to be judged by how it treats those who don’t agree with it” or “ask those affected by first, they will tell you”, or “whether it would affect your decision, when by some miracle the big lottery would change roles and birthplaces”. Switzerland even is one of the birthplaces of anarchism, or anarchosyndikalism, Mikhail Bakunin died here in Bern. In short his plan was to replace the state by a free federation between voluntarily associated economic producers. Which is of course some sort of governement, but small scale - a federation of Co-operative, which is of course some sort of state, but in such a way, that also the workplace is democratic. Pretty awesome idea, to actually get rid of economic feudalism, and introduce democracy where we work too.
Anarchists in my country all seem to understand no-god given-hierarchy and no-inherited-hierarchy. They never mean ‘chaos’, they all build societies in their dreams, never lonely individuals, they all emphasize hierarchy of competence or natural leadership, the act of willing to subordinate oneself under a common goal, strange isn’t it? The more freedom you seem to have, the more you restrict your freedom, the more you submit yourself voluntary and withdraw your trust voluntary.
Those early thinkers, true revolutionaries, never seemed to be troubled by the state though, rather by those holding the keys to power. Are you sure that you know who holds the keys?
I like it, not anti-state, but state-independent
Really great article. Maby one small idea to share: Maby write “I” instead of “you”, since whatever we write, we write our own thoughts. Then we share them. And when it is written in first perso, the reader will identify with the text even faster.
Onward 🫡
Let’s go 🚀
👌
#TheMoreYouKnow
Good Vibes 🫡
Onward 🫡
Good Vibes 🫡
“Grow something” Max said…

Wow, pure fire, thank you!
I wish the reposts of this article are more than the zaps
Let’s go 🚀
Write a comment