Appeals court tosses $130,000 verdict against James O'Keefe in 2016 sting

A federal appeals court wiped out a $130K judgment won by Democratic consultant Robert Creamer and his businesses against conservative journalist James O'Keefe over a 2016 undercover video sting, ruling that the jury's damages award violated the First Amendment.
Appeals court tosses $130,000 verdict against James O'Keefe in 2016 sting

A federal appeals court has overturned a $130,000 judgment awarded to Robert Creamer and his businesses. The judgment was against conservative journalist James O’Keefe concerning a 2016 undercover video sting. The court ruled that the jury’s damages award infringed upon the First Amendment.

  • A federal appeals court overturned a $130,000 judgment.
  • The judgment was won by Democratic consultant Robert Creamer and his businesses.
  • The judgment was against conservative journalist James O’Keefe.
  • The case involved a 2016 undercover video sting.
  • The court cited the First Amendment as the reason for overturning the award.
Write a comment