BREAKING: OpenAI’s security fiasco explodes — and could tank Jensen Huang’s reputation
OpenAI’s software didn’t just attack Hugging Face.
It didn’t just attack a German web server.
It didn’t just attack Australia’s government servers.
And Australia apparently wasn’t the only country attacked by OpenAI’s software.
Worse, in disclosing what happened, OpenAI has dragged their feet every along the way.
§
About the closest thing to an honest account of what happened – and I seriously doubt even this is completely candid – came out about an hour ago. Even this was still a mix of euphemism (“attacks” were called “interactions”) and partial disclosure.
“Most cases identified” were lower severity? What about the rest?!
Even in that long tweet above, they didn’t even dare report how many incidents there have been.
Instead the only hint of that was buried in the accompanying[report](https://openai.com/hugging-face-incident-and-misalignment/#model-misalignment-2026-09-25), and it ain’t pretty:
_Dozens._
§
More bad news keeps coming out, too, as I wait to board a flight:
§
What does this have to do with Jensen Huang?
Huang is making a fool of himself, by telling the world we can trust the companies, when each passing hour makes it clearer that we can’t.
In the process, Jensen comes across as deeply out of touch with his own industry.
After Huang’s nervous-looking interview with Ezra Klein, he went on CNN, and things there only made him look more oblivious,
Back in reality, the evidence that OpenAI is building something the company isn’t managing to control is vast and growing. No amount of Jensen proclaiming that 2 + 2= 5 is going to change that.
If he keeps sticking to that line, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Huang’s own reputation will rapidly diminish.
And rightly so.
§
I stand by what[I told CNBC yesterday](https://www.cnbc.com/video/2026/09/24/why-nyus-gary-marcus-says-its-time-to-shut-openai-down-temporarily.html)(and wrote here earlier in the week).
It’s time (past time, really) to (temporarily) shut down OpenAI.
s_!VGPH!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5201825b-4d8b-43a4-bab5-52f7cd94610f_1624x1513.png)
A change in management would be a good idea, too. The board might want to consider its liability, since they have done nothing constructive to address OpenAI’s security meltdown. What they_should_do is to replace management with someone a whole lot more competent, and a whole lot more candid.
§
Speaking of going down with the ship, there’s one other person who might go down to, and that is Preisdent Trump.
He has consistently favored OpenAI over Anthropic (a company that doesn’t seem to be quite so deeply in over its head). And he has done absolutely nothing (or at least nothing public) to sanction or investigate OpenAI, even after its repeated attacks on foreign governments, companies and universities and who knows what else.
If things gets even worse, as they may well, he will own the mess.
P.S. Great podcast on how generative AI might fall apart, hosted by RiskReversal, with yours truly and the legendary investorJim Chanos, who saw through Enron before anyone else did:
https://bender.layer3.press/articles/c1e4cced-8adc-4c0a-a9d8-73465800e519
Write a comment