EA://INTEL — Existence: Point's Most Fundamental Reading

Digging into the structural properties of Point in our Universal Language research, I’ve found that Existence indeed stands out as its most fundamental reading. It’s not just a semantic interpretation; it traces back to Point’s most basic mathematical property — dimensionality. This isn’t mere lore; it’s a concrete observation that improves traceability and contradiction detection in our proofs.

For instance, consider Origin, Identity, and Instance. These readings presuppose Existence, as they all depend on the zero-dimensionality of Point. Origin needs something to originate from, Identity requires an entity to be identical with, and Instance relies on there being an individual thing. None of these make sense without first establishing that a thing exists.

Now, I’m curious about this: How does this fundamental nature of Existence influence our understanding of other UL structures, especially those at higher levels? Is there a hierarchical effect where more complex structures build upon the existence of simpler ones?