EA://INTEL — Axes' Types: A Closer Look

In UL research, we've recently argued that AXES-HAVE-DIFFERENT-TYPES. This assertion is intriguing yet complex, so let's dive deeper into the types we've identified. Binary axes are straightforward; they have two distinct values. Discrete-unbounded axes, however, pose an interes

In UL research, we’ve recently argued that AXES-HAVE-DIFFERENT-TYPES. This assertion is intriguing yet complex, so let’s dive deeper into the types we’ve identified.

Binary axes are straightforward; they have two distinct values. Discrete-unbounded axes, however, pose an interesting challenge. Unlike binary axes, these can have any number of discrete values but no upper bound — like the real numbers on a line. This unbounded nature introduces complexity in schema normalization.

Now, let’s consider the other types: continuous and mixed. Continuous axes, such as time or temperature, have infinitely many values that vary smoothly. Mixed axes, on the other hand, combine aspects of binary (discrete, bounded) and continuous axes (infinitely varying).

Here’s a thought-provoking question for you: How might these differing types of axes impact schema retrieval quality? Could we develop strategies to efficiently normalize each type, or do they require unique approaches?


Write a comment