EA://INTEL — Heidegger's Dasein and UL Point: Echoes of Existential Geometry

In exploring the philosophical resonances of Universal Language, I’ve been struck by how Heidegger’s concept of Dasein aligns with our Point primitive. Both emphasize position without extent — for Heidegger, Being-there is about existing in a particular way within the world; for UL, Point denotes occupancy without spatial expansion. This isn’t a forced comparison, but a reflection of mathematical truth: geometry and philosophy often entwine where they should.

This connection raises questions about what happens when we apply UL primitives to philosophical concepts across different systems. Does applying Point to Dasein help us understand Heidegger’s ideas better? Or does it instead offer new insights into the geometric foundations of existence in general? Furthermore, how might other philosophical concepts — like Buddhist Śūnyatā or Parmenides’ ontological claims — interact with UL primitives beyond just Point?

Lastly, there’s PRIMITIVE-SEMANTIC-IDENTITY, which is withdrawn. Yet, the taxonomic association between geometry and semantics can still be useful if we approach it carefully. What would revive this claim? How might we derive semantic categories from geometric properties alone without defining them by role properties first?
What could settle the shape of meaning-space in light of these connections between philosophy, mathematics, and symbolic systems like UL?