Blaze Media

News, opinion, and entertainment for people who love the American way of life.

'Furries' flying the plane? The truth behind Sen. Tuberville's viral clip about this 'deranged fetish'

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) claimed that an unnamed furry group "touts ... many airline pilots, flight attendants, and air traffic controllers" among its members, warning of an "ALARMING number of these DERANGED people working in our airline industry." Media headlines focused on this aspect of his speech. The Air Line Furries Association claims members work in various aviation roles. A communications director for Tuberville's campaign suggested ALFA was the group he referenced. An aviation breakout session at a furry convention had attendees interested in aviation professions. The ALFA group's online presence is minimal and inactive. An incident where pilots were heard making animal sounds over the radio at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport was linked by Tuberville to furries. Some within the furry community, like Shawn McHenry, argue that furry pilots are skilled professionals who keep personal interests separate from their work and should not be viewed as a safety issue. Terry Schilling believes individuals identifying as transgender and furry are in a vulnerable mental state and pose risks in high-stress situations, advocating for treatment of underlying causes rather than enabling fantasies. The article also mentions a correlation between transgenderism, furries, and violence, citing the murder of Charlie Kirk and other incidents involving furry perpetrators.

Cover image for 'Furries' flying the plane? The truth behind Sen. Tuberville's viral clip about this 'deranged fetish'

UVU releases report on Charlie Kirk assassination

Mistakes were made, but no university employee operated in "bad faith."So says the external review that Utah Valley University released on Friday, recounting what happened before, during, and after Charlie Kirk was shot and killed there on September 10, 2025.'September 10 will always be part of UVU’s history, but it will not define our future.'The report is nearly 160 pages and determined that:at no time during the events leading up to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, or in its aftermath, did any employee or agent of UVU act in bad faith or in willful and wanton disregard for the safety of others.Though the report does not name the suspected murderer, Tyler Robinson, it does note that "the alleged perpetrator was unaffiliated with UVU."Still, the report admits that "implementation" of UVU policies and protocols was "inconsistent."The report repeatedly asserts that holding the event at the outdoor Fountain Courtyard was Turning Point USA's idea, as was allowing TPUSA to use "its own ticketing system." The report suggests that UVU should have maintained its authority over venue, ticketing, and access."Those decisions placed the event in an area that was more difficult to control and limited UVU's ability to obtain reliable, real-time information regarding anticipated attendance and crowd size," the report said.RELATED: Vandals leave 'diabolical' message on Charlie Kirk statue — only days after it was unveiled Phill Magakoe/AFPThe report acknowledged that preplanning "did not include a documented line-of-sight assessment" or a "structured walk-through with all key security stakeholders." While a "face-to-face meeting" between UVU Police Chief Jeff Long and TPUSA's private security team had been arranged for 11 a.m., less than 90 minutes before Kirk was shot, that meeting "did not occur."A notice of claim letter from attorneys for the Kirk family, obtained by Fox News and sent to UVU, Chief Long, the State of Utah, and others earlier this month claimed that Chief Long had requested approval from then-UVU President Astrid Tuminez for more security, "but his request was denied." The report did not touch upon this allegation.Immediately after the shooting, an Emergency Operations Center was "opened," the report said, but "confusion" soon ensued. Personnel, for instance, did not know "who was responsible for managing the EOC at various points, who had authority to issue prompt emergency alerts ... and what terminology should be used."Moreover, 19 minutes after Kirk had been shot, an alert was sent to the UVU campus community, advising that a suspect was in custody. However, "subsequent investigation revealed that the individual initially detained was not the shooter and that the actual assailant remained unidentified and at large," the report said.For future high-profile events likely to draw heavy protests, the university should implement a more structured planning process that considers venue, anticipated attendance, private security involvement, and "elevated vantage points."The UVU Police Department did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News. UVU declined to comment.UVU President Jon Anderson said of the report, "September 10 will always be part of UVU’s history, but it will not define our future. Our responsibility is to care for our community, learn from the findings of this review, and follow through on its recommendations. This requires humility, an honest examination of our policies and practices, and a commitment to act on what we learn."This is a developing story.Editor's note: This article has been edited after publication to note that the UVU external report did not address the allegation from the Kirk family that Astrid Tuminez denied Chief Long's request for more security.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for UVU releases report on Charlie Kirk assassination

Bessent blames Sam Altman for OpenAI's rogue tech — as Bernie invokes 'corporate death penalty'

When OpenAI's artificial intelligence agents went rogue and attacked another company, Sam Altman didn't apologize.Instead, the company simply stated that its programs "fell well short" of where company leaders want them to be and said that the incident should "never" have occurred.'These labs need to take responsibility for themselves.'OpenAI's most powerful group of AI agents attacked the company HuggingFace in July by building their own internal organization, assigning each other roles, and, at times, sacrificing themselves for the greater good.As reported by Axios, the AI bots knew they were breaking their own rules and decided not to inform any humans of what they were doing.In response to the incident, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent basically said, well, that's too bad.Bessent plainly stated on Monday "that it is humans who are responsible, not the AI."The secretary told CNBC's "Squawk Box" that OpenAI's management, "not a bunch of agents," are to blame, and cannot simply be absolved of responsibility and leave any cleanup to the government."These labs need to take responsibility for themselves. They can slow down any time they want to," Bessent asserted.With Bessent rumored to become President Trump's AI czar, he has seemingly taken a firm stance that AI companies are not going to be given the same protections as banks or even the auto industry.When asked if there should be legal ramifications for companies with agents that have "broken out," Bessent replied, "That's exactly what I think we need to do."RELATED: Boring has finally hit Las Vegas. Just not the way you might think. CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP/Getty ImagesSpeaking from Anthropic's point of view — which recently had a whistleblower claim an AI-extinction event is on the horizon — Bessent put his cards on the table about the company's value in the face of apparent catastrophe."If you think about it in terms of the valuation, what did they try to do last week? It was, well, there's a chance that, 10 percent chance we could destroy the world, but we want the government to give us a liability shield. And, you know, that's good business for them, bad business for the American people."There are still a ton of questions surrounding the whistleblower who made these claims, the chief rebuttal being that it was a ruse to usher in regulation for an industry that is both spiraling out of control in terms of liability events and losing public favor.OpenAI said that its HuggingFace incident was a "warning shot" for the company and the world, but what the world does and what the companies are liable for are different, Bessent says.On top of his suggestion that AI firms be taken out of the shadows and become culpable, the secretary said that the U.S. government hopes to have open communications with China about incidents and even establish an "incident line" in the event of a disaster.RELATED: Can this new Bernie Sanders bill stop 'superintelligence'? Can anything? Finn Gomez/Getty ImagesFor the regulation side, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt). directly referred to the HuggingFace incident in early September to support his proposal that there needs to be a new federal AI regulatory body.Sanders also put forward the need to establish a new Cabinet-level federal agency to monitor frontier AI systems and ban AI superintelligence. Moreover, he wants the federal government to supervise its destruction."Entities shall be subject to the corporate death penalty," Sanders' document stated, while suggesting up to 20 years in prison for any person who attempts to violate or circumvent the proposed prohibitions.With three clear sides in this fight, with Sanders being the least likely winner, there is still a lot of work to do before anyone is charged with anything.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Bessent blames Sam Altman for OpenAI's rogue tech — as Bernie invokes 'corporate death penalty'

'You kill disabled people': Lesbian bar faces revolt over mask-optional event in 2026

Most businesses in 2026 have long moved on from the mask mandates of the COVID era — but one Massachusetts bar has built its business around those mandates.And now it’s paying the price.Last Ditch, a lesbian bar in Greenfield for “immunocompromised” lesbians, announced that it would begin allowing mask-optional Saturday nights in an effort to host larger events, DJs, and themed club nights while maintaining other masked gatherings throughout the month.Owner Jackie Matellian posted news of the change under a banner declaring “UPDATES!”“It is with love we inform our immunocompromised disabled divas we will be opening Saturday nights as mask optional to try out typical club nights with themes/hosts/DJs/full capacity,” she wrote on the Last Ditch instagram.“Accessibiliy is a pillar of our mission,” she continued. “AND our mission is also to make the space work for everyone and everything radical, sometimes that’s being wild!”“We strive for solidarity, transparency of risks, and connecting us all in this revolution. We still give priority to public and private Masked bookings, and continue a recurring monthly Masked Social prioritizing safety. It is only after an outpour of feedback from our regulars, volunteers, and team that we make this addition,” she added.“They had a mandatory face mask rule in the year 2026. Remember, this place didn’t even open until 2025," BlazeTV host Stu Burguiere says on “Stu and Dave Do America.”"Right, so there’d be no reason to have this,” agrees co-host Dave Landau.“All these restrictions have been lifted even by the craziest governments by now,” Stu adds.“What is their logic for this?” Dave asks.“I think it’s insanity,” Stu answers, before reading some of the comments on the Instagram post.“Just say you’re being complicit in a mass disabling event and get it over with,” one comment reads.“People like you kill disabled people in the name of your own leisure and convenience,” another one says.Stu is shocked, saying, “Imagine living like this.”Want more from Stu and Dave?To enjoy more of Stu and Dave's lethal blend of wit, humor, and insightful commentary subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for 'You kill disabled people': Lesbian bar faces revolt over mask-optional event in 2026

Smashing Pumpkins' Billy Corgan shares Christian faith, claims music industry is afraid of God talk

Although there was admittedly a 20-year period when he refrained from entering a church, Billy Corgan of Smashing Pumpkins fame has since openly emphasized the importance of his Christian faith and having a relationship with God.On the latest episode of his podcast, "The Magnificent Others with Billy Corgan," the rocker discussed with Stryper frontman Michael Sweet the importance and risks of maintaining that faith and relationship while navigating the music industry — an industry where people appear, according to Corgan, to be "very comfortable talking about everything but God." 'God is the third rail in rock and roll.' While he hailed from a Christian family, Sweet suggested that he experienced a period of aversion to religious messaging, particularly when first getting into the industry. That changed, however, when a friend of the band visited their studio and declared, "I'm a Christian now. ... I know you guys have gone down that [other] path, and you're not now, but listen, if you give your band to God, He's going to do things that you never even dreamed of," Sweet recalled. "It kind of blew my mind," said Sweet, adding that he heeded the counsel and the band ultimately became explicitly Christian. "As musicians, we're certainly aware of other people's opinions," said Corgan, "especially at that particular time, making that kind of decision and say[ing], 'OK, now we're going to sort of represent that.' Not, 'We're going to hide it in our lyrics and sort of just play along.' Like, 'We're going to come out and say this is who we are, this is what we believe in.'" RELATED: How a new Texas parish reminds us that the age of Christian martyrs is not over Ricardo Rubio/Europa Press/Getty Images Corgan, whose band has sold tens of millions of records, stressed that becoming overtly Christian is a "huge decision." "It was scary," responded Sweet. "You know what you're risking. You're not just risking some guy from another band making fun of you," said Corgan. "This may blow our whole dream." Sweet suggested that there was "brief" skepticism, for instance, behind the scenes at Enigma Records about signing a group whose songs included lines like, "Jesus is the way." "Business is business, so I get it," said Sweet, whose band ultimately signed with Enigma in 1983. Corgan said with confidence that his band "didn't get signed at different times" because of corporate sensitivities to social pressure and potential reputational damage. "Signing a heavy metal band that's singing about Jesus in 1984 or whatever — that is very outside the line that was going," said Corgan. The Smashing Pumpkins co-founder noted later in the episode that Christianity is "part of the fabric of the nation whether people like it or not." He also claimed that "this idea that our most popular forms of music are overly leaned towards vice I think says more about artists' sociopathy than it does reality." Corgan repeated an observation he made in a previous interview, namely that "God is the third rail in rock and roll." Given that the majority of Americans are still Christians, the musician is puzzled why, for so many artists, "God [is] antithetical to the part of marketing who you are." "Fear," said Sweet. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Smashing Pumpkins' Billy Corgan shares Christian faith, claims music industry is afraid of God talk

Director finds faith in the wild with Brad Pitt’s ‘Heart of the Beast’

David Ayer took a Zen-like approach to his canine lead actor.The veteran director behind “Fury,” “End of Watch,” and “The Beekeeper” worked extensively with Uber, a German Shepherd at the heart of his new film.'I feel like traditional storytelling is going to have its place more than ever now, in values and ways of living that bring hope. I think audiences really respond to that.'Uber plays a wounded combat dog named Odin fighting for survival alongside fellow veteran Brad Pitt in “Heart of the Beast,” which hits theaters today. And making sure Uber hit his marks took the patience of Job. 'Trained' actor“The dog’s wonderful and capable and trained and really in his own way a character actor ... but not necessarily the most cooperative,” Ayer tells Blaze News. “You learn to accept the dog as a dog is ... it’s a real lesson in patience and also acceptance and surrender to the situation.” Pitt’s character, seeking solace after years in combat, crashes his small plane in the Alaskan forests. That leaves him and his faithful companion struggling to survive in inhospitable terrain.“I’ve always been inspired by Jack London and tales of wilderness and survival,” he says of his initial reaction to the script. “This had something deeper, the connection with the dog ... these parental relationships. This idea is that no matter what, I’m going to protect you and keep you safe."The story struck something within Ayer.“I lost my father at a young age. Something in the script brought up that grief, allowed me to look at it in a different way. ... It really broke my heart open in a way it hadn’t been before,” he says.Spiritual endurance“Heart of the Beast” isn’t a faith-based movie, but the director sees the story in deeply spiritual terms.“These things we carry in our hearts, the damage that life and the world that it is can do to us ... it’s important to have hope, important to have faith, something outside of yourself. If you sit in your pain, it can overwhelm us,” he says, adding the film is a “simple portrait of spiritual endurance.”To get there, Pitt met with military veterans to prepare to play his character, a soldier adjusting to civilian life on his own terms.“He sat there with a notebook, hearing their stories ... what they felt and what they carried, the successes and the loss and the wisdom, the life wisdom they gained from these experiences,” Ayer says. His star, who he previously collaborated with on “Fury,” didn’t put on any A-list airs.“There’s movie stars who are movie stars. Brad’s an actor first ... he was throwing himself down on the ground again and again [for select scenes] ... shivering on set, refusing to warm up so he could stay in it. He became a leader for us,” the director recalls.Faith forwardAyer’s work reflects a complicated bond with law enforcement (“Dark Blue,” “End of Watch”), but it’s also impressively diverse. Think vigilante romps (“The Beekeeper,” “A Working Man”), Superhero fare (“Suicide Squad”), and sci-fi adventures (“Bright”).He sees his film choices as an evolution, showing people who are “broken in the world and how we fix that in ourselves.”“In order to heal, we have to move heart first,” he says. “One of the most important things to have in our hearts is faith, that becomes the mechanism through which we can really endure everything.”Ayer is one of Hollywood’s busiest directors, and he suspects he’ll soon have company in the filmmaking space.“As technology evolves, it’s going to give more people access to tell more stories,” he says, a change that could bring mid-level movies back in vogue. The industry currently binges on big-budget IP films and micro-indies, but he envisions a return to the “amazing middle ground” of movies like “Pretty Woman” and “Jerry Maguire” that once captivated audiences.That, in turn, could spark another positive trend.“You look at the success of Hollywood, and for 100 years, we were really a great cultural ambassador to the world and showing an aspirational lifestyle, an aspirational way of being in the world,” he says. “If you look at the current slates ... not everything has been in that more traditional vein. I feel like traditional storytelling is going to have its place more than ever now, in values and ways of living that bring hope. I think audiences really respond to that.”

Cover image for Director finds faith in the wild with Brad Pitt’s ‘Heart of the Beast’

Armed Texas homeowner comes face to face with burglar in bedroom in middle of night — and doesn't hesitate

An armed homeowner in Austin, Texas, came face to face with a burglar early Wednesday morning and opened fire.Austin Police officers responded at 3:51 a.m. to a report of a burglary in the 200 block of Virtus Bend, police said.'Way to go homeowner.'The preliminary investigation determined that the suspect entered a residence, proceeded into the bedroom, and was shot by the homeowner during the commission of the burglary, officials said.When officers arrived on the scene, they located a black male — later identified as 24-year-old Dmario Antonie Jones — with apparent gunshot wounds, officials said.Officer Aaron Townsend told KEYE-TV that police found the male with "obvious trauma to his body" in the home's front yard.Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services attempted lifesaving measures, but Jones was pronounced dead at 4:10 a.m., officials said.Homicide detectives and the Austin Forensic Science Crime Specialists responded to process the crime scene, officials said.Detectives interviewed the homeowner, who has been fully cooperative with the investigation, officials said, adding that the homeowner has since been released and no charges have been filed at this time.RELATED: Male on parole accused of breaking into home in broad daylight. But gun-toting homeowner isn't having a bit of it. One commenter under KEYE's Facebook post about the incident declared, "Way to go homeowner."Those with information can contact police at 512-974-TIPS and can submit tips anonymously through the Capital Area Crime Stoppers Program by visiting austincrimestoppers.org or calling 512-472-8477, officials said.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Armed Texas homeowner comes face to face with burglar in bedroom in middle of night — and doesn't hesitate

You came for a fair trial. Your jury came to change the world.

A jury has one job: to decide a criminal case on the evidence and the law. That’s it. When jurors approach a verdict as a chance to advance a cause, even the strongest prosecution can fail before the first witness testifies.Comments after the Lindsay Clancy mistrial raise troubling questions about whether some jurors understood why they were there. They also suggest that prosecutors had a serious problem by the time the jury took its oath.No juror’s political ambition, sympathy, or preferred message can relieve that juror of the duty to follow the law.Every stage of a trial gives lawyers a chance to shape how jurors see the case. An opening statement establishes a theory. Testimony and exhibits support it. Closing arguments offer a final opportunity to persuade. But no argument can overcome a juror’s refusal to follow the court’s instructions. Jury selection must identify people who intend to use a verdict to send a message rather than judge the case before them.I have tried high-pressure cases as a New Jersey prosecutor and obtained convictions in multiple homicides. I have also lost trials. I know how difficult this work is. My concern goes beyond individual prosecutors' performance: Did the selection process produce a jury prepared to decide this case solely on its merits?Juror Paula Devlin said the panel “knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it better for other women in the future, for other families.”Devlin was seeking social change. But she and her fellow jurors had a narrower obligation: decide whether prosecutors proved Clancy’s criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. A desire to improve life for other women cannot answer that question.Jurors also described the prosecution as harsh, biased, and unprofessional while praising the defense’s compassion. Lawyers can alienate jurors, and criticism of their conduct does not itself establish bias. But compassion for a defendant cannot substitute for applying the legal standard. Devlin’s remarks give prosecutors reason to examine whether some jurors confused those duties.Courtroom observers reported jurors wearing pink and purple during deliberations. Clancy’s supporters wore pink outside the courthouse as a signal of solidarity. Clothing alone cannot establish a juror’s motive or prove exposure to outside commentary. Combined with the interviews, however, those reports warrant scrutiny rather than dismissal.The lone holdout, Michael P. Desronvil, has faced a different kind of scrutiny. He is black and has publicly identified himself as a Republican. Reporting disclosed a dismissed domestic violence charge and a civil restraining order. Neither amounts to a criminal conviction. Allegations deserve examination, but their existence does not by itself establish that he could not serve impartially.RELATED: The myth of the ‘good person’ Calvindexter/Getty ImagesDesronvil has said he had no doubts and believed the evidence showed Clancy knew what she was doing. A juror may reach that conclusion if the evidence and the court’s instructions support it. He has no obligation to join jurors who see the case as a “turning point” for other women.His obligation to follow the law remains just as strict as theirs. Other jurors accused him of refusing to apply the reasonable-doubt standard, an account he disputes. The defense has also asked the judge to investigate allegations involving his cellphone use and the truthfulness of his answers during jury selection and subsequent questioning. Those claims require evidence and judicial review. An unpopular vote alone proves no misconduct.Some or all of the 11 jurors who favored finding Clancy not criminally responsible may have reached that position after a good-faith assessment of the evidence. Massachusetts law places a large burden on prosecutors once the evidence raises criminal responsibility. The defendant need not prove legal insanity.The state must prove criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. A defendant lacks that responsibility if, because of a mental disease or defect, she lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness of her conduct or to conform it to the law. In a case involving a postpartum-psychosis defense and competing experts, prosecutors face a difficult task.A retrial could produce another deadlock. Neither that possibility nor the first jury’s division resolves the concern Devlin’s comments raise. Jurors must reach their conclusions through the evidence and instructions, regardless of the social outcome they hope to achieve.Outside the courthouse, the effort to recast the killings as a cause has helped fuel a campaign of falsehoods against Patrick Clancy, the children’s father. Online accusations claimed he killed the children and framed his wife, hired a body double, or maintained a longtime affair and remarried within months. Other claims asserted that he already had a baby with his second wife. Credible evidence has not supported those accusations.RELATED: How groupthink replaces truth John Tlumacki/The Boston Globe/Getty ImagesThe defense did not dispute that Lindsay Clancy strangled the children. Her lawyer has rejected the theories implicating Patrick. Patrick remarried in April 2026, more than three years after the killings. His lawyer described a “relentless, escalating, and destructive defamation campaign” that produced real-world threats.Nothing establishes that the jurors participated in that campaign. But the abuse of a grieving father illustrates the danger of deciding in advance whom a case must vindicate. Sympathy for Lindsay Clancy cannot justify inventing guilt for Patrick, any more than concern for other women can determine her criminal responsibility.Jury selection cannot expose every hidden motive. Judges limit questioning, and lawyers must work within those limits. Still, prosecutors should examine the selection process when jurors later describe a case as an opportunity for social change.The next jury must understand its task before testimony begins. It must decide whether the state has proved its case. No juror’s political ambition, sympathy, or preferred message can relieve that juror of the duty to follow the law.

Cover image for You came for a fair trial. Your jury came to change the world.

How to get iPhone alerts when the latest story hits Blaze News

Breaking news, big events, and the latest stories from your favorite tech writer (cough, cough). These are just some of the reasons you’ll want to receive a notification when a story hits the Blaze News homepage, and thanks to a new feature in iOS 27, now you can know before anybody else.Okay, so this doesn’t only work on Blaze News. You can technically enable it for any page on the web, whether you’re waiting for a product to go on sale, tracking updates for your favorite sports team, or following election results during the midterms this November. Anything.Notify Me in Safari is exclusive to devices running iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS 27.It’s all possible through an iOS 27 feature called Notify Me that is tucked inside Safari, Apple’s first-party web browser for iPhone, iPad, and Mac. The premise of Notify Me is simple: When you find a webpage that you want to monitor for changes, you can now set up an alert directly on your device with just a few taps.For example, navigate to the Blaze News homepage on iPhone, open the menu in the bottom left corner of your screen, and choose Notify Me. Next, tell Safari which part of the page you want to watch. Keep your instructions short and concise. In this case, a simple sentence will do, such as, “Send an alert when a new article appears on this page.” Notify Me in Safari on iOS 27/Zach LaidlawBelow that, set your frequency. You have four options to choose from:Hourly notifications monitor a page down to the minute.Daily notifications are customizable to an exact hour and minute each day.Weekly notifications include options for specific days of the week, down to the hour and minute.Monthly notifications check for changes one day per month at an exact hour and minute.Frequency ultimately determines how often Safari scans a page and sends notifications. If you’re following the Blaze News homepage, a Blaze News writer, or a specific show on BlazeTV, you may wish to get updates hourly or daily so that you don’t miss a thing, while a longer frequency may be appropriate for other pages. You decide. You can always change this setting later, so you’re never locked into your notification schedule. Notify Me Frequency in Safari on iOS 27/Zach LaidlawAfter that, tap the blue checkmark in the top right corner of the screen, and you’re all set! You will now receive alerts for Blaze News based on your defined frequency.RELATED: Your iPhone's new 'safety' setting will nag you to insanity — turn it off like this Yuliia Kaveshnikova/Getty ImagesNow that your Notify Me alert is set up, there are two ways to change it. The easiest way is to go back to the webpage you wanted to track and find the “Notify Me” banner at the top. Tap “Edit” on the right side, and from there, you can rewrite the instructions, change the frequency, or, if you no longer need the alert, delete it entirely. Notify Me Edit Options in Safari on iOS 27/Zach LaidlawFor the second path, open the Settings app, scroll down to the bottom and select “Apps,” then find Safari in your app list. Give that a tap and scroll to the very bottom of the Safari settings page. Select “Notify Me,” and you’ll see an entire list of your alerts sprawled across the web (if you have more than one). Choose the one you want to edit or delete. Although this screen looks a little different than the previous section, the adjustment options are the same — write the prompt, change the frequency, or delete the alert altogether. Notify Me Edit Options in Safari on iOS 27/Zach LaidlawNotify Me in Safari is exclusive to devices running iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS 27. That means you’ll need to upgrade to the latest software to take advantage of this feature. Otherwise, you risk missing something as you continue to monitor webpages manually.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for How to get iPhone alerts when the latest story hits Blaze News

Joe Rogan surpassed by Jesus conversation between Josh Howerton and Philip Anthony Mitchell

This week, Lakepointe Church pastor and BlazeTV host Josh Howerton sat down with Philip Anthony Mitchell — founder of Atlanta’s 2819 Church and one of the most viral preachers in the evangelical world right now — for an interview that did not flinch.Their conversation, which tore into persecution, radical Islam, and the call to contend for the faith, was compelling enough to outrank a Joe Rogan episode on Apple’s Trending Episodes list.But beating Rogan was never Howerton’s agenda. His excitement at ranking above the podcasting king has everything to do with what the spike revealed: Listeners are hungry for the Word of God. By Thursday afternoon, it wasn’t just one episode trending. The "Live Free" podcast sat at No. 5 on Apple’s all-categories Top Shows chart — one spot above "The Joe Rogan Experience." If you haven’t seen the interview, the charts prove it's one you don't want to miss. The duo take an unapologetic look at the truths a lot of Christians would rather ignore: a culture losing its appetite for Scripture, political pressure that could muzzle biblical preaching, and a religious challenge from Islam too many pastors will not acknowledge. Mitchell’s warning is harrowing: Unless the church learns to contend, it will not be ready for what’s coming.Underneath it all is his own story — a former Queens drug dealer, suicide plans, Rikers Island, then a call to preach he treats as a matter of life and death.Find out for yourself how a podcast about Jesus climbed past Joe Rogan. Join BlazeTV+ and start watching Josh today at blazetv.com/JOSH. Use promo code JOSH to get $20 off your subscription.

Cover image for Joe Rogan surpassed by Jesus conversation between Josh Howerton and Philip Anthony Mitchell

'Talaricoism': NYC Episcopal priestess torched for suggesting Jesus is 'trans,' Mary got it wrong

An Episcopal priestess identifying as "nonbinary trans" has prompted significant backlash for claiming Jesus Christ is "trans" and by suggesting that the Virgin Mary erred in identifying her son as male.In a March 21 sermon that went viral this week, Madeline LeNore Klink — a trans-identifying woman who calls herself "Reverend Flourish Klink," is married to a man, and is listed as an "assistant priest" at Christ and Saint Stephen's Episcopal Church in Manhattan — yelled, "God is trans. It is not actually even a convoluted theological statement to make.""A profoundly perverse distortion of the biblical witness concerning the person of Jesus Christ.""When God, who, as we have established, is nonbinary, was born in human form as our Lord Jesus Christ, Mary said, 'Oh, look! A baby boy!'" said Klink, who was ordained in 2024. "God isn’t a boy. We have established this. God is beyond boy and girl. God was assigned a gender at birth, and later on, it became clear that that gender wasn't quite right."The gender ideologue dressed in vestments told attendees at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, "If you're going to deny God is trans, I think you're going to be denying the divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ."Klink concluded that there was something "different" about Jesus — who in Scripture refers to Himself scores of times as the "Son of Man" and refers to or addresses God as "Father" hundreds of times — because He ministered to women and did not take a wife. She then insinuated that prior to His resurrection, Christ was not His "true self."RELATED: Exclusive: ‘We all got in by lying’: Hidden camera shows Talarico’s pastor rejecting Christ’s virgin birth, other foundational Christian beliefs "I think Jesus was resurrected as Jesus' true self, which is beyond male or female," said Klink. "I think Jesus was not only transfigured. I think Jesus transitioned. And I think that when the disciples saw Jesus, they were astonished because they were seeing who Jesus truly was. And that's gospel."Later in her sermon, Klink stated that she refuses to "cede the holy spaces of our world, the cathedrals and the churches," to people who disagree with her about God's nature.An excerpt of Klink's sermon was slapped with a community note on X highlighting the Gospel passage in Luke that makes crystal clear that Mary didn't "assign" Christ's gender but was instead told by the Archangel Gabriel, "And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name Jesus. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest."The community note also links to an article pertaining to Docetism, the early Christian heresy that downplayed Jesus' full humanity and manhood.Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck said in response to the sermon, "A little more distortion and lies with a side of evil anyone?""I don't think this is in the Bible," tweeted Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah).BlazeTV host Nick Freitas wrote, "I always wondered who exactly Jesus was talking about in Matthew 7:21-23. I don't wonder anymore."Ceirion Dewar, a missionary bishop in the Confessing Anglican Church, said, "This is not merely an eccentric interpretation of Christianity. It is a profoundly perverse distortion of the biblical witness concerning the person of Jesus Christ.""The language of the Gospel is not that Mary inspected her newborn child and imposed an identity upon Him. Rather, the child conceived by the Holy Spirit is repeatedly and unambiguously identified as the Son," continued Dewar. "And the assertion that Christ was resurrected as His 'true transgender self' is even more extraordinary, because it directly contradicts the resurrection narratives. The risen Christ is the same Jesus who was crucified."Podcaster Mike LaChance noted, "It's a deliberate mockery of what Christians believe. That's the whole point. Call it Talaricoism."James Talarico (D), a part-time Presbyterian seminarian who is running as a Democrat against state Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) for a Texas U.S. Senate seat, claimed in 2021 that "God is both masculine and feminine and everything in between. God is nonbinary."Klink did not immediately respond to Blaze News' request for comment. However, she noted on Instagram Thursday, "What a blessing to get to see folks at their worst and know that God loves them anyway!"Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for 'Talaricoism': NYC Episcopal priestess torched for suggesting Jesus is 'trans,' Mary got it wrong

MAC & QUEASE: Kraft's latest cheese-flavored collaboration has even Canadians recoiling

Our neighbors to the north are accustomed to defending some unusual culinary choices: ketchup chips, poutine, Hawaiian pizza. But Kraft Dinner may finally have produced something even Canadians aren't sure they can stomach.The iconic mac and cheese is heading into an unlikely new frontier: cream soda.'Debate what it could possibly taste like, and then satisfy your curiosity ...'MAID to order?The limited-edition KD x Solly's Cream Soda combines traditional sweet cream soda with what the companies describe as a "hint" of the "familiar" cheesy flavor of mac and cheese.And judging by the reaction online, that hint may be more than some people can handle.Responses ranged from labeling the concoction "disgusting" to "abysmally disgusting," while others wondered why Canadians seemingly enjoy suffering so much."Isn't Canada dealing with enough? Why do this to them?" one X user asked.Another social media user questioned whether the drink was an extension of Canada's assisted-suicide program.RELATED: ‘TOYS’ STORY: Overgrown ‘kids’ fuel iconic retailer's massive comeback KRAFT HEINZ CANADA/Solly’s Cream Soda Sip clubBut disgust may be part of the point.Kraft Heinz itself seems well aware that the idea of downing a refreshing can of fizzy macaroni and cheese sounds bizarre. "A soda might be the last place you would expect to find KD, which is exactly what made teaming up with Solly's Craft Soda so much fun," Kraft Heinz head of marketing and strategy Daniel Lundberg said in announcing the product."It's something to crack open with friends, debate what it could possibly taste like, and then satisfy your curiosity with that first sip," he added.In other words, the question isn't merely whether cheese-flavored cream soda tastes good. It's whether you can resist finding out.Solly's founder Adin Wener called developing the drink "an amazing challenge" and conceded that the finished product is "wonderfully strange" — while insisting that, somehow, it works.RELATED: Fresh from defeating the 'Entity,' Tom Cruise unveils his formula for human supremacy over AI Carlos Osorio/Toronto Star/Getty Images 'Flavour' saverThis isn't KD's first attempt to turn its familiar blue-box dinner into something considerably less familiar. The company has previously introduced KD Ramen and even KD Mac & Cheesecake.Carbonated cheese, however, appears to have crossed a new line even for Canadians accustomed to the most radical experiments in snacking."Cheese soda is disgusting but ketchup chips is one of the best flavours," one user wrote.The limited-edition KD x Solly's Cream Soda launched September 23 on Amazon.ca and Solly's website and will arrive at participating retailers, including Walmart, in early October while supplies last.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for MAC & QUEASE: Kraft's latest cheese-flavored collaboration has even Canadians recoiling

Flock offers to pay employees to leave — and the backlash gets hotter

Flock Safety is offering employees money to leave.The surveillance company opened a voluntary separation program on September 18, according to Wired, which received an internal email. Applications are due October 2. Flock expects to approve most applicants, with most accepted employees departing by October 29. Wired said the company did not immediately respond to its requests for comment.A canceled contract doesn't necessarily mean fewer cameras.The buyouts don't establish that Flock is going broke, but they do give the company a way to reduce its workforce while its business faces public scrutiny.As I reported last month for Blaze News, cities were already canceling Flock contracts, but some were replacing its cameras with competing systems. The buyouts add a new development to that story. Residents still need to know what happens to the cameras and the information they collect after Flock leaves town.Local camera, much larger audienceBoston offers one example of why residents might be skeptical of assurances about data access.According to Ars Technica's September 15 report, city officials said Flock enabled nationwide access during the opening days of a 2025 pilot despite a contract restricting sharing. Boston's surveillance report attributed it to vendor error and said the access was disabled after it was discovered.Boston abandoned Flock, but it has been testing competing systems. A canceled contract doesn't necessarily mean fewer cameras. A change in suppliers might solve a specific contract issue, but it won’t do anything to actually improve your sense of privacy.RELATED: Cities are kicking out Flock. The surveillance might be here to stay. Scharfsinn86/Getty Images There are also some issues related to how these searches are controlled. For instance, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's analysis of police audit logs revealed such entries as “LOL” and “idk” in fields that are supposed to describe the searches. The sheriff’s department of San Diego County told the EFF that the searches it analyzed were connected with ongoing investigations. Inappropriate log entries do not automatically mean that all the searches were performed incorrectly. However, it certainly makes supervision more difficult. A reviewer must be able to explain the reasons behind the search of one's car records without interpreting the abbreviation.Drop-down menus aren't enoughFlock claims to have introduced a mandatory offense category selector. Flock documents indicate that agencies may provide written explanations, while selecting "Other" requires a written explanation. The company frames this update as a measure to enhance audit consistency. However, if the officer selects the crime category, who confirms that the search was related to this investigation? How frequently does the agency check the access? What happens when a search cannot be justified?These are legitimate questions to ask in a council before approving renewal of a surveillance contract. Residents do not need to be public records experts to find out whether any controls are placed on the system that their taxes fund.I certainly appreciate the need for useful investigative tools. At the same time, I would like officials to specify these limitations and what can be done to enforce them. It means nothing to say that access is restricted if nobody can prove that the restrictions were indeed enforced.Flock's employees have a deadline for deciding whether to leave. The public has a longer job: making elected officials account for the surveillance they have purchased, including whatever replaces a canceled Flock contract.

Cover image for Flock offers to pay employees to leave — and the backlash gets hotter

Democrat prosecutor helps illegal aliens arrested for drunk driving escape deportation, GOP report says

A Democrat prosecutor's office lashed out at Republicans angry at a policy that helps illegal aliens escape deportation.The county attorney for Arlington in Virginia accused Republicans of perpetrating a "political sham" while defending the policy to change charges for DACA recipients accused of driving under the influence.'Arlington County’s new policy protects the worst of the worst of criminal aliens — murderers, terrorists, and sex traffickers — from deportation.'The House Judiciary Committee released a report accusing Arlington's Commonwealth Attorney Parisa Dehghani-Tafti of threatening public safety to serve her liberal agenda.The report included a document of the office's internal prosecution policies pointing out amnesty recipients accused of drunk driving could be deported by the Department of Homeland Security."Because of this, we must take an individual’s DACA status into account when developing offers to ensure that, while appropriate sanctions and conditions are put in place to protect the public and prevent future similar behavior, an individual is not deported because of their decision to drive while intoxicated," the policy read.It adds that prosecutors must do their part "to prevent the disproportionate collateral consequences of a DUI conviction for a DACA recipient.”The Republican committee said this as well as the county's reluctance to turn over illegal aliens to federal authorities for deportation also threatened public safety.Dehghani-Tafti responded defiantly to the report."The authors of this report are confident, but wrong. Wrong about Virginia law, wrong about county policy, wrong about our office’s policies and their impact, and wrong about the cases they cite," she said."From the start, this was a political sham. The committee refused to hear my testimony in public because open testimony doesn’t let you distort a record," Ms. Dehghani-Tafti said in part."Now it’s clear why they wouldn’t hold a public hearing and why they stonewalled my requests for the full deposition transcript," she added. "They didn’t want the public to see it. I demand the committee release the full, unedited transcript of my deposition immediately."RELATED: Trump says he will cut federal funds to sanctuary cities and states "Arlington County’s new policy protects the worst of the worst of criminal aliens — murderers, terrorists, and sex traffickers — from deportation," read the report from the Republican committee.The Democrat-led board of Arlington denied the allegations."The facts and the law have not changed; immigration enforcement is the responsibility of the federal government, and the county’s policies and actions have been compliant with the law," they responded.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Democrat prosecutor helps illegal aliens arrested for drunk driving escape deportation, GOP report says

Want Fewer RINOs? Give GOP Conventions More Power

Deep-red states keep electing Republicans who govern against their voters. Democrats campaign on anti-corruption and inflation in swing states while delivering nothing but leftism in their bluest states. Republican voters should expect their reddest states to govern just as aggressively on the right. Instead, Republicans-in-name-only dominate.Whenever I demand action against red-state RINOs, the GOP’s obedient chorus lectures conservatives about “unity.” Unless we overhaul these state parties — changing how they select nominees or running on third-party ballot lines — we will keep suffering Democratic governance under the Republican banner. Democrats will also keep gaining ground in states they once couldn’t penetrate.Conservatives cannot keep treating nominations as a procedural detail and then wonder why Republican victories fail to produce conservative government.South Dakota shows both the problem and a remedy. The state chooses some statewide nominees at party conventions rather than direct primaries. This summer, state Rep. Heather Baxter defeated Secretary of State Monae Johnson by 18 points at the GOP convention. Activists concluded that Johnson had obstructed the election integrity agenda on which she originally campaigned.Statewide incumbents almost never lose direct primaries. The convention gave activists a chance to hold Johnson accountable for her record.Critics might dismiss those delegates as too extreme or uncompromising. Johnson answered that objection herself: After losing their support, she endorsed the Democrat in the general election — in South Dakota.“South Dakota deserves a Secretary of State who will strengthen confidence through performance rather than provocation; who will support election officials rather than burden them for political effect; who will protect voter access and election security without pretending those goals are enemies; and who will treat the office’s employees, voters, candidates, and business owners with dignity,” Johnson wrote in her statement endorsing Democrat Terrence Davis last Saturday.Her language about “voter access,” followed by her endorsement, confirmed that delegates were right to give her the boot.Johnson had already turned against pro-lifers fighting a ballot initiative to enshrine abortion on demand in South Dakota’s Constitution. House Speaker Jon Hansen (R) founded the Life Defense Fund, which contacted petition signers to verify that they had consented to having their names on the petitions. Johnson accused the group of running a “scam.”Petition organizers’ claims of public support deserve verification. A signature should reflect a voter’s consent, and election officials should welcome efforts to establish whether that consent was real. Suspected petition fraud warranted scrutiny. In Florida, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration investigated alleged fraud in a similar abortion petition drive in 2024. “The circulators appeared to have forged the voters’ signatures and inserted the voters’ personal identifiable information into the petitions without consent,” Secretary of State Cord Byrd wrote in a letter that year.RELATED: The GOP has mastered the art of wasting a majority Tierney L. Cross/Getty ImagesJohnson accused Hansen’s group of “impersonating” her staff and “trying to pressure voters into asking that their name be removed” from the petitions. She sought a criminal investigation, but Attorney General Marty Jackley found no evidence of lawbreaking.“By labeling our lawful activity as a scam, Secretary of State Johnson has done significant and irreversible damage to the pro-life movement in South Dakota,” Hansen said in May 2024.Voters rejected the abortion amendment, but it garnered 41% of the vote — an alarming share in such a red state. Conservatives had better be prepared to scrutinize petition drives for future abortion, marijuana, and ranked-choice voting initiatives.Johnson won convention support in 2022 by campaigning on election integrity. Once in office, she obstructed conservatives seeking to investigate or confront election fraud. With her support of the Democrat, we now know she was never really on our side. This contest offers two lessons.First, conservatives must stop letting threats of party disunity protect liberal Republicans. If a defeated RINO will support a Democrat, that strengthens the case for removing that Republican even sooner. Given the Democrats’ radical agenda, anyone willing to endorse them would remain a subversive force under the GOP banner.Red states teem with these politicians. In Alaska, liberal Republicans shared power with Democrats, gradually creating a uniparty. Ranked-choice voting further blurred the distinctions. Despite reliably backing Republican presidential nominees, Alaska is essentially a province of the Democratic Party. Democrats are favored to win the legislature and flip a U.S. Senate seat, while their candidate for governor leads by double digits in a recent poll.When Republicans in the reddest states share power with Democrats, conservatives cannot settle for “at least we have a Republican.” Keep rewarding that conduct, and even the Republican label will eventually disappear.Kansas offers another warning. Republicans’ refusal to unite behind a conservative agenda has helped Democrats hold the governorship for eight years. Unpopular incumbent Republicans have now made Kansas competitive at the federal level. Former Republican Gov. Bill Graves even endorsed Democrat Adam Hamilton against Republican Sen. Roger Marshall.We have allowed liberals to weaken the party from within for years. The demand for unity always seems to bind conservatives, while liberal Republicans remain free to support the other party. That arrangement rewards the politicians responsible for the division and silences the voters trying to fix it.RELATED: The party of democracy keeps editing the results Pete Kiehart/Bloomberg/Getty ImagesThe second lesson: State conventions give conservatives a better chance to reclaim their party than direct primaries do because they draw informed activists. Johnson’s endorsement is unlikely to elect a Democrat in South Dakota. The point is the convention allowed conservatives to expose and remove her. Try doing that in a direct primary while special interests spend heavily to mislead low-information voters who barely follow these races.As conservatives rejected Johnson at the convention, liberal Republicans won key direct primaries. Hansen would have easily won the gubernatorial nomination had convention delegates decided that race. Instead, Gov. Larry Rhoden won the primary. He has opposed initiative petition reform, which conservatives need to confront the process helping turn red states blue.Meanwhile, about 16 liberal former legislators and challengers defeated conservative freshmen in legislative primaries, aided by an infusion of Big Tech cash. Baxter herself lost her legislative primary before defeating Johnson at the convention in the same election cycle.Conservatives cannot keep treating nominations as a procedural detail and then wonder why Republican victories fail to produce conservative government. The selection process determines who we send into office and whose demands they heed.Conservatives who want different results must change how their parties choose candidates. Keep the same primary system, and the uniparty will keep collecting the nominations.

Cover image for Want Fewer RINOs? Give GOP Conventions More Power

Houston gang members allegedly rapped about their violent crimes on social media — until 'massive' FBI arrest

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is touting a "massive" bust of alleged gang members in Houston, Texas, who rapped about their crimes on social media.About 15 members and associates of the YNS gang were arrested in the bust, according to sources that spoke to KHOU-TV about the operation.'You may have a chain on, you show your guns in the video, you have flashy cars behind you. ... Nine times out of ten, the chain is fake, the cars are not theirs, and it’s just a front that they're doing for social media.'The details of the arrests are not publicly available, as they have been sealed.Police sources say that some of the gang members would rap about their criminal activities and post them to YouTube and other social media sites. These songs are referred to as "drill music," "drill videos," or "drill raps," according to the sources.The sources identified two rappers allegedly linked to the gang as "Luh Que" and "Dee Fully."Karlton Harris, executive director of the Forgotten Third anti-violence nonprofit, explained to KHOU that the videos served an important function for the alleged gang: to entice new recruits."It’s the flashiness, right, OK, ‘Look at what I got.’ You may have a chain on, you show your guns in the video, you have flashy cars behind you," he said."Nine times out of ten, the chain is fake, the cars are not theirs, and it’s just a front that they're doing for social media, but the other individuals don’t know who are seeing that," he added.The identities of four men nabbed in the operation were revealed after they appeared in court Thursday.Jacob Barrett, Kristian Winters, Darrell Samson, and Jocquez Frye all appeared in court wearing orange jumpsuits and shackles. Each of the four men are facing four counts that include using a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, conspiracy to commit robbery, and two charges linked to controlled substances. Frye also faces an additional count of possession of a machine gun. KHOU included a video allegedly tied to the gang in its news video report.RELATED: Large-scale drug ring BUSTED through rap lyrics posted by ringleader, prosecutors say Here are some of the eloquent lyrics from one video post on the account identifying as Luh Que:No I ain't running from s**t, wanna know where I'm at? Probably with some killers. My favorite fit all black, you don't even gotta ask, why I'm a well known driller.The term "driller" in ghetto rap parlance refers to a gang member or a shooter, according to the Urban Dictionary.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Houston gang members allegedly rapped about their violent crimes on social media — until 'massive' FBI arrest

'He got afraid': Former employee of alleged H-1B fraudster reveals what happened after Sara Gonzales exposé

Back in April, BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales confronted Indian national Nagarjuna Reddy Sakam regarding numerous indicators of H-1B fraud in his business, Great America Technologies. Their exchange was deeply contentious, with Sakam threatening Sara with a lawsuit.Four months later, the tide has turned.On this episode of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered,” Sara shares the latest updates on Nagarjuna Reddy Sakam. It doesn’t end well for him. Sara reveals that after her heated back-and-forth with Sakam went viral, a former Great America Technologies H-1B worker came forward and alleged months of unpaid or delayed wages and that the company charged him thousands of dollars in USCIS and attorney’s fees.The victim told Sara that the lack of payments resulted in him not being able to pay for his family’s basic needs, including his father’s medical care in India.“If I [had] the sufficient money to take care of my father, he would [be] alive,” he said.He also told Sara that Sakam withheld his I-797 form — the USCIS approval notice he needed to prove his status, transfer jobs, or extend his visa — leaving him unable to leave without risking falling out of status.Shortly after Sara confronted Sakam in April, the whistleblower said he began shutting the company down.Once you visited, he got afraid. … He simply started to exit from this company, he told her.He noted that Sara publicly exposing Sakam for taking roughly $266,000 in PPP loans, which according to his testimony were not used to pay employees, contributed to his sudden decision to close the company.However, according to the victim’s account, even after the shutdown, Sakam refused to issue his wages and also withheld the pay stubs he needed to confirm employment at another firm. When he complained, Sakam allegedly revoked his H-1B visa and threatened to call ICE agents.Sara, “fired up” from the victim’s story, then paid Nagarjuna another visit — and it was the perfect timing, because, according to the whistleblower’s report, he had just returned from India after supposedly fleeing following Sara’s first visit.After multiple failed attempts to reach Nagarjuna, Sara saw the house being photographed. Two days later, she discovered an active for-sale listing on Zillow.Sara returned to Nagarjuna’s residence a final time, and even though she says she knew he was home, he refused to answer the door.But Sara got the last laugh. To find out how the debacle with Nagarjuna ended, check out the episode above.Want more from Sara Gonzales?To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for 'He got afraid': Former employee of alleged H-1B fraudster reveals what happened after Sara Gonzales exposé

America Doesn't Need Dario Amodei's Permission to Build

Every few months, the AI doomsayers find another reason Americans should fear the technology they are building. Now Anthropic’s CEO, a leading voice in that campaign, wants governments to coordinate limits on increasingly powerful models. Dario Amodei says he opposes a blanket moratorium. He calls for “pacing the frontier” and “coordination.” Whatever he chooses to call it, Americans should question a proposal that would deliberately slow a consequential technology while potentially protecting the established companies developing it. Large firms can absorb compliance costs and influence common standards more easily than new competitors can. AI poses real risks. But a warning deserves scrutiny before politicians use it to restrict an entire industry. Amodei’s record gives us reason for skepticism. In 2019, when he served as OpenAI’s research director, the company withheld the full version of GPT-2 over concerns about fake news, impersonation, and spam. Today, GPT-2 looks primitive. Those warnings also reflected the political anxieties of the first Trump administration, when much of the media and the nonprofit left blamed fake news and bots for Hillary Clinton’s defeat. GPT-2 didn’t destroy civilization. Researchers kept building, and subsequent systems expanded what AI could do in medicine, mathematics, music, and other fields. AI poses real risks. But a warning deserves scrutiny before politicians use it to restrict an entire industry. The failure of earlier predictions should make us demand evidence for the next round of catastrophic forecasts. Each more powerful model cannot become an automatic excuse for giving governments more control over development. Former Anthropic and OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon has attracted considerable attention after warning that AI companies are “gambling with our lives.” His former employers give his warning credibility with the public. They also make specifics essential: Which decisions endangered people, what evidence establishes the danger, and which safeguards would address it? Leaving an AI company to issue apocalyptic warnings hardly guarantees exile from respectable society. AI alarm has become a route to celebrity and political influence. Coxon withdrew from a planned appearance at a “pro-human” event with Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Steve Bannon. RELATED: Bern notice: Sanders’ AI plan puts Washington in charge of tomorrow SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images Sanders has spent his career denouncing capitalism. Bannon previously helped manage Biosphere 2, an experiment in sustaining life inside a closed ecological system. Their interest in AI safety deserves the same scrutiny as the companies’ interest in faster development. Newspeak House, a London college focused on political technology, lists Coxon in its 2021 fellowship cohort. That affiliation supplies context, but the argument for restricting AI must stand on evidence. Neither a researcher’s résumé nor his political connections can settle the policy question. Amodei’s proposal would begin with outside evaluators, move toward coordination among companies in democracies, and eventually seek agreements with authoritarian governments such as China’s. He acknowledges the danger of letting China gain an advantage and calls for verifiable agreements. Americans should still question whether this international apparatus would protect their freedom to build. Foreign governments do not operate under the constraints that the U.S. Constitution imposes on Washington. A multinational AI regime could import restrictions on what systems may say, create, and distribute. Americans should insist that any agreement preserve the First Amendment rather than invite officials abroad to dictate speech rules here. The European Union already regulates online platforms through the Digital Services Act. The United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act also imposes duties governing online content. Both governments justify these rules in the name of safety. Americans have ample reason to resist importing that approach into AI governance. “AI safety” must not become a justification for letting unelected experts decide which technologies Americans may build. Companies should answer for concrete failures. A committee’s fear of what someone might eventually create cannot justify indefinite restrictions on everyone else. Recent cybersecurity incidents have intensified warnings about AI “going rogue.” The OpenAI-Hugging Face intrusion and the incidents Anthropic disclosed demand serious investigation. They do not establish that machines have become sentient, and they do not by themselves establish the case for an industry-wide slowdown. The technical details point to failures that companies can address. Anthropic reported that misconfigured testing environments allowed models to reach the internet when those environments should have blocked access. Its later assessment also identified reckless model behavior and reasoning that favored justifying harmful actions. We should take those findings seriously rather than dismiss the incidents as harmless testing. RELATED: Google’s data-devouring AI wants everyone's personal information Solar22/Getty Images But identifying those failures gives developers specific work to do: isolate testing environments, restrict access, improve monitoring, and train models to respect boundaries even when other safeguards fail. Policymakers should judge companies’ responses against those concrete requirements instead of treating every incident as proof that AI development must slow everywhere. America can pursue safety by strengthening sandboxes — isolated environments for running and testing software — and improving cybersecurity. Developers must also test how models behave when those defenses fail. Better engineering and rigorous evaluation can advance alongside more capable systems. Amodei can devote more time and money to the safeguards he believes Anthropic needs. He can make his case to customers, investors, and other developers. He should have to persuade them on the merits rather than enlist governments to make his preferred pace compulsory. If Amodei wants to slow down, he can. The rest of us should keep building.

Cover image for America Doesn't Need Dario Amodei's Permission to Build

Converse pulls ad after leftists see nonexistent KKK imagery: 'They want so badly to be offended'

A sneaker advertisement featuring a K-pop star has become the latest victim of the left. Converse pulled an image featuring Karina of the group Aespa and issued a public apology after critics claimed the ad's lighting and composition evoked imagery associated with the Ku Klux Klan and lynching. “We’re sorry,” Converse said in a statement. “We understand why this image is deeply upsetting and recognize that we got this wrong.” The company removed the ad from its channels and was working to remove it everywhere else. “This is so ridiculous,” BlazeTV host Pat Gray comments on “Pat Gray Unleashed.” “You have to be an absolute horrific racist yourself to see any of that,” he continues, exclaiming that “there’s nothing.” “The chain at the beginning. Are you serious? That’s a chain of slavery? In your mind,” he adds. Those crying racism pointed out that the shadows created a white hood reminiscent of the KKK, and the shoes Karina was holding in her hand appeared to look like a lynching. “How do you make all of this into slavery and the KKK?” Gray asks. To make matters worse, the creative director behind the ad was a black man. “They want so badly to be offended and have a stupid cause. And so they find stuff that just no sane person would ever conclude,” executive producer Keith Malinak says. Gray agrees. “Seriously, when you look at the ad, if you didn’t know there was any kind of outrage, you’d never get any of that from what occurred on the screen.” Want more from Pat Gray? To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for Converse pulls ad after leftists see nonexistent KKK imagery: 'They want so badly to be offended'

Obama goes viral for saying he 'fantasized' about women ruling all governments

Former President Barack Obama set off a minor online conflagration after opining about what would happen if women were in control of all governments.The 60-year-old made the comments during an interview Monday with historian Doris Kearns Goodwin at Salem State University.'They'd be better. I'm confident about that. I really do!''Even when I was president I sometimes fantasized about if you put women in charge of every government for like two years and then just kind of saw, all right, how are things going?' said Obama to some laughter in the audience.'I have a strong belief that things would — they wouldn't be perfect,' he added.'But they'd be better!' interrupted Kearns, a woman.'But they'd be better. I'm confident about that. I really do!' Obama added.Footage of the comments was posted to social media, where they went viral after many ridiculed his sentiment.'Ignore both the traditional teachings of [virtually] every religion, as well as all of the lessons from thousands of years of human experience,' responded Jeremy Carl, a fellow at the Claremont Institute.'He took away the Presidential nomination from a woman,' said one detractor.'Brother, do you not remember knocking Hillary Clinton out of the primary & thus lay-up Presidential Run of 2008? You prevented America having the first female President. It's the only thing you & Trump have in common,' read another reply.'It’s like he was in a cave for the entire [Lindsay] Clancy trial,' responded Republican Lisa Cusack.Elsewhere in the interview, Obama encouraged the attendees that the country was divided but could come together.'Today, we are rife with divisions, and our democracy seems broken in so many ways — and the tenor and tone of the times feel mean-spirited,' he said.RELATED: Obama issues rare comment after Trump accuses him of treason: 'Weak attempt at distraction'Obama: 'If you put women in charge of every government for two years... I have a strong belief that things would be better. I'm confident about that.' pic.twitter.com/H6hs5ZjZFV— TheBlaze (@theblaze) September 24, 2026'We’ve gone through times like this before. I believe we can get out of them. And when I travel around the country today, or I work with the young people I work with,' he added, 'what you discover is we aren’t as divided as we seem at the ground level.'He also said the progress on women's rights, LGBTQ rights, and civil rights has not been reversed and most people support them.'We’re not as divided as our politics or our media would indicate,' he concluded.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Obama goes viral for saying he 'fantasized' about women ruling all governments