Blaze Media

News, opinion, and entertainment for people who love the American way of life.

Videos capture Palestinian activists screaming at Mamdani: 'Opportunist piece of s**t!'

Pro-Palestinian protesters showed their outrage at Democratic New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani after he made an appearance at the Israelis for Peace vigil in Union Square.The activists screamed at Mamdani that he was a traitor in videos captured by bystanders as the mayor left with his entourage and security.'There's no mutual understanding when you're killing our children, our family members.'"You opportunist piece of s**t!" one woman yelled.Mamdani appears stone-faced and angry halfway through the video."Mamdani, you can't hide! We charge you with genocide!" they chanted in another part of the video.The Muslim mayor has been accused of having ties to pro-terrorist groups, but the protesters were apparently upset that he didn't do enough to oppose Israel.The event was held on Oct. 7, the anniversary of the horrific terrorist attack on southern Israel by Palestinian terrorists. Israel retaliated with a devastating military campaign intended to wipe out the terrorist threat.Protesters chanted and made as much noise as possible for about an hour in order to interrupt the vigil.Others yelled, "Allahu Akbar!" in another video from the event. One protester holds up a sign reading, "Bomb 'Israel' bye!""There's no mutual understanding when you're killing our children, our family members for no justified reasons," another protester says in that video."Mayor Mamdani is a sellout!" yelled another, according to the New York Times.Organizers of the vigil read accounts from Israelis who lost their loved ones in the Oct. 7 terror attack but also took time to recognize testimonies from Palestinians about the conditions in the Gaza Strip.The protesters focused on rhetorically attacking Mamdani.RELATED: New York Times gets ROASTED over bizarre framing of alleged terror attack on plane — and the Times responds Mamdani was also criticized for posting a message earlier in the day that emphasized the Israeli military response to the Oct. 7 terror attack. "This day is profoundly painful for so many New Yorkers. It marks three years since the horrific war crimes of October 7. On that day, Hamas killed more than 1,100 Israelis and abducted 251 others. We grieve alongside our many friends and neighbors who still carry that unthinkable loss," he wrote. "The suffering did not begin nor end that day. It instead continued through the Israeli government's devastating, ongoing genocide in Gaza," he continued. "Three years later, we must refuse to accept a world in which occupation and apartheid continue, where war crimes are met with impunity, and our federal government continues its complicity with every arms shipment."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Videos capture Palestinian activists screaming at Mamdani: 'Opportunist piece of s**t!'

'If the people want me, I'll do it': Don Lemon makes wild comments about possible presidential run

Ex-CNN personality Don Lemon has made a shocking statement about his future — and it may involve a pivot toward politics.Lemon told Spencer Macnaughton on his "Uncloseted" podcast that if enough people want him to run, he'll mount a presidential campaign. He said there's more than a 50% chance that he will run someday.'It makes me wonder if my best way of being and operating in this society, whether it is through journalism or if it is through becoming the president of the United States.'"Look, I never say never. I've got a lot on my plate right now doing what I'm doing. This is not easy to do every day, but I have to be — I am very aware of the importance of what I'm doing, what it means to the culture and society," Lemon said.He is best known for his role as a primetime anchor and morning show co-host on CNN before he was fired in 2023."How serious is it? If the people want me, I'll do it," he added. "But it is a daunting undertaking to run for president in this country because you'd have to be devoted to it full-time. And I would like to devote much of my time to journalism."He estimated his chances of running to be between 65% and 70%. "When I'm out there, I'm out there, and I cover the candidates, and I look at what they do, and they're very good," Lemon said. "It makes me wonder if my best way of being and operating in this society, whether it is through journalism or if it is through becoming the president of the United States."Lemon was fired after several controversies that included his saying on-air that Nikki Haley, a presidential candidate at the time, was "past her prime."RELATED: Don Lemon remains defiant after being released over church takeover arrest: 'I will not stop ever!' After leveraging his name recognition to build a YouTube channel, Lemon rode along on a "takeover" protest against a church in January over the pastor's support for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He was arrested for his alleged participation, though he claimed he was acting merely as a journalist."There is no more important time than right now, this very moment, for a free and independent media that shines a light on the truth and holds those in power accountable," Lemon said at the time.Lemon pleaded not guilty in February and filed multiple motions to dismiss in August.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for 'If the people want me, I'll do it': Don Lemon makes wild comments about possible presidential run

Kathy Hochul expands MMR vaccine administration to midwives — but is it safe for the baby?

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) has declared a state of emergency over measles — and as the self-described “OG antivaxxer at the Blaze,” Sara Gonzales is pushing back. Especially against the new recommendation for who exactly can administer the shot. “Why is it in the government’s purview to determine what is and is not acceptable for your family?” Gonzales asks, noting that she takes “particular issue” with Kathy Hochul for “expanding the pool of health care providers who can administer MMR vaccines to include midwives.” “Now, what I take issue with on this is that midwives would treat who?” Gonzales asks. “Obviously, they would be treating pregnant women,” she says. “And pregnant women specifically, they have done no studies for the MMR vaccine, how it affects pregnant women, and the CDC’s own website says that pregnant women should not get the MMR vaccine because they don’t know what it can do to a fetus,” she continues. “So I’m like, why is the government stepping in and saying, ‘No, actually, don’t listen to our own CDC,’ who they just said several years ago we have to trust. ‘The CDC is the end-all be-all. They are the science,’” she adds. Want more from Sara Gonzales? To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for Kathy Hochul expands MMR vaccine administration to midwives — but is it safe for the baby?

We tried mac & cheese soda so you don't have to

Some things are better left unsaid. Or in this case, better left untasted.When Kraft decided it was going to mix its iconic macaroni and cheese flavor with another product, some likely thought it might be akin to a Cheetos collaboration, or the home recipe of Doritos and pasta.Instead, the company went with cream soda.'It's not horrible, but it's horrible.'Notes of powdered cheddarThe iconic Kraft brand released the limited-edition KD x Solly's Cream Soda, with the "KD" referring to Kraft Dinner, which is how Canadians refer to the traditional meal.A sweet cream soda with a "hint" of the "familiar" cheesy flavor of mac and cheese? Blaze News couldn't help but try it out.The soda's unappealing orange hue offers few clues as to what awaits the drinker. In the glass, it could easily be mistaken for Hi-C or a particularly unfortunate vintage of Pedialyte. You decide.The soda's bouquet certainly reveals hints of cheesy goodness, with unmistakable notes of powdered cheddar on the nose. But the palate tells a different story: citrus-forward, with the vanilla notes of a cream soda lingering faintly in the background.Unfortunately, the cheese is all aroma and no finish. Once it hits the tongue, the dominant flavor is less artisanal nacho platter than watered-down Tang that's been left on the counter too long.One Blaze News reporter said after a few gulps that he could probably "throw up" if he was to "let go.""It has no flavor at the end," he added, describing the taste as immediate but "halting."RELATED: MAC & QUEASE: Kraft's latest cheese-flavored collaboration has even Canadians recoiling Blaze News Fizzy fiasco"It's not horrible, but it's horrible; you could drink one can," said a news writer who asked to remain anonymous. "You could drink an entire can without getting sick," he gleefully added.The review concluded with, "You can really taste the cream soda, though."Other reviews concurred. "It was more like a prebiotic/probiotic drink," a man on the Reddit page for soda wrote."Not very sweet at all. Smelled more like yogurt than soda. Massive disappointment," he added.RELATED: 'I have photos of my son in high heels': 'Law & Order' star gives deranged speech about wanting a gay son KRAFT HEINZ CANADA/Solly’s Cream Soda Liquid carnageFood critic Dan Clapson was more measured, lamenting the lack of actual cheese ingredients while deeming the beverage "surprisingly drinkable."That much drinkers can agree upon; it is technically consumable.For a similar effect, home cooks can take a can of cream soda, pour it into a glass, leave it in the fridge for a day, and then add some mac and cheese powder, stir and drink.Otherwise, collectors probably don't even need to open a can.2.4/10.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for We tried mac & cheese soda so you don't have to

800,000 show up for the pope in France — and the left is losing it

About 800,000 people turning out to see the pope in France should hardly be cause for alarm, unless you were hoping that Catholicism was already dead in Europe. BlazeTV host Pat Gray believes the massive turnout has exposed a very different reality — and has been a harsh awakening for France’s leftists. “They’re pissed off right now because the pope, he was in country this week, and like 800,000 people showed up. They were psyched for him to be there, and I think that because it’s Europe, everybody just figured that Catholicism was virtually done in France,” Gray explains. “The Muslims are upset. The leftists are upset because this is showing that soft Catholic power is back in France,” he adds. Gray jokes that unlike a different religion, Catholics don’t inflict harm on nonbelievers. “Remember when the pope said that he was going to force everyone in France to become members of the Catholic Church?” he asks. “He said, ‘No, you actually do have a choice. You don’t actually have to convert to Catholicism. You can be killed instead. We’ll just cut your head off.' Remember when he said — oh, wait, no, you don’t remember that, because that didn’t happen,” he laughs. He poses another satirical question, “But what about when the Catholic nation was causing terror all around the world? Remember that Catholic nation?” And another, “Financing proxies to commit murder in their name and in the name of Jesus and swearing to destroy Israel by driving them into the sea?” “Oh, wait. No, you don’t remember that, either, because first of all, there’s not a Catholic nation, and secondly, that didn’t happen,” he says. “I don’t think you need to fear the Catholics in France, because they’re not the ones doing anything,” he adds.

Cover image for 800,000 show up for the pope in France — and the left is losing it

Paxton hammers Talarico for going 'missing' from campaign trail — and Trump chimes in hilariously

Ken Paxton is mocking his Democrat opponent for seemingly going missing from the campaign trail as Election Day looms.James Talarico, who is competing against Ken Paxton for a U.S. Senate seat in Texas, recently stopped appearing in person at campaign events and released a statement saying he had contracted the flu from shaking so many hands.'No one has seen him for an extended period of time. Where is he? What is wrong with him? Bad rumors are coming out.'On Wednesday, Texas Attorney General Paxton (R) had his supporters chant, "Where is Talarico?" at a Trump rally in San Antonio to ridicule the Democrat in the pivotal last weeks of the campaign.CNN reported Thursday that Talarico’s last public appearance in Texas was a press conference on September 26.Talarico's campaign issued a statement about his ongoing absence."After holding more than 100 public events and shaking tens of thousands of hands, James came down with the flu but will be back on the trail this weekend," said a statement from campaign spokesperson J.T. Ennis, according to CNN and Brooke Taylor of Fox News."Ken Paxton has been ignoring Texans this entire campaign, and his priorities are clear: He doesn’t answer to the people of this state — he answers to his billionaire megadonors and special interests," the statement added.President Donald Trump issued a scathing post laughing at Talarico for his unusual campaign absence."Ladies and Gentlemen, upon information and belief, James TalaFREAKo, who is running for the United States Senate in Texas, is MISSING IN ACTION!" the president wrote on social media Wednesday."No one has seen him for an extended period of time. Where is he? What is wrong with him?" he chided. "Bad rumors are coming out."RELATED: Talarico’s black and Hispanic outreach stalls just weeks before early voting Paxton posted images to social media of posters jokingly calling Talarico a missing person. "Missing posters are popping up across Texas as the search continues," he wrote. "LAST SEEN: 12 days ago. Texans everywhere are asking: where is James Talarico?" Democrats are looking to flip the Texas seat in hopes of seizing control of the U.S. Senate from Republicans in order to thwart the president's agenda in the last half of his final term.Those hopes might be dashed, as blacks and Hispanics question more and more whether Talarico's campaign has done enough to reach out to those constituencies. You can check out the latest polling average between Paxton and Talarico, plus race trends and other helpful data, at Blaze News' Poll Watch.Texas Senate polls 2026: Talarico vs. Paxton Texas Senate polls 2026: Talarico vs. Paxtonpollwatch.theblaze.comLike Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Paxton hammers Talarico for going 'missing' from campaign trail — and Trump chimes in hilariously

Abdul El-Sayed attacked Obama. Now they’re campaign partners.

Just days ago, Democratic Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed announced that Barack Obama will join him on the campaign trail in Michigan later this month. While the former president will try to make El-Sayed as palatable to the public as possible, El-Sayed’s comments over Obama’s presidency reveal perhaps some animosity between them.Long before El-Sayed ran for U.S. Senate in Michigan, he worked as a college professor and then as the public health director of Wayne County. His political aspirations emerged when he ran for governor in 2018, but he ultimately lost the battle to Gretchen Whitmer. To this date, he has never held elected office.In El-Sayed’s words, Obama’s presidency was rife with political blunders, pandering to right-wingers, and poor choices.Although he wasn’t officially a politician, El-Sayed had plenty to say about the political class in 2012, namely Barack Obama. He pulled no punches in a contributor piece for HuffPost, delivering an entire laundry list of grievances against the left’s darling former president.“Obama's re-election last night was no victory,” he opined on the morning after Obama secured a second term. El-Sayed continued by digging into Obama’s failures to end the ongoing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, a campaign promise that helped him secure the presidency. Not only did Obama renege on his promise, but he even expanded U.S. war efforts into Pakistan and Yemen. Obama was also a big proponent of drone strikes, a move that “perpetuated a climate of American hate, distrust, and destruction,” according to El-Sayed.Next, El-Sayed took shots at the Affordable Care Act, claiming that Obama’s “prized accomplishment” failed to meet expectations and instead delivered “a watered-down reform that kowtows to the interests of health care lobbies before it provides meaningful, secure access to health care for our society's most desperate.”Lastly, Obama “deported more people from our shores than any other president before him.” Although President Donald Trump is gaining on this number today, Obama still holds the deportation record, removing 3.1 million foreigners through Immigration and Customs Enforcement during his two terms.RELATED: Abdul El-Sayed claims ‘Muslims literally built this country,' only proves he 'hates America' Pat Gray Unleashed/BlazeTVIn El-Sayed’s words, Obama’s presidency was rife with political blunders, pandering to right-wingers, and poor choices. More importantly, El-Sayed identified Obama’s true super power: his “magnanimous” disposition with “captivating” prose and “fresh” perspective that duped the minds of the voters who made him president.It’s this same charisma that El-Sayed plans to weaponize for his own political gain today. If Michiganders fall for Obama the way the nation did in 2008, El-Sayed has a true shot at securing the Senate seat.Abdul El-Sayed has a history of using influencers to further his political career, sometimes to his detriment. Earlier this year, El-Sayed partnered with controversial streamer Hasan Piker, with the two appearing at events to boost El-Sayed’s clout with content creators. Unfortunately for El-Sayed, Piker’s ongoing comments about how much he hates America have left a stain on his election prospects, a stain that he hopes to erase with Obama at his side. Poll Watch/Blaze MediaThe Michigan race is close, with pollsters leaning toward Abdul El-Sayed as the favorite over Republican Mike Rogers. For the latest Michigan Senate seat updates — and to follow other important midterm races across the nation — check out Poll Watch, available for Blaze News, BlazeTV+, and Blaze Unlimited subscribers.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Abdul El-Sayed attacked Obama. Now they’re campaign partners.

Vulnerable Ohio Democrat's Last-Minute Flip-Flop on Trans Insanity Has LGBT Activists Crying

Despite early recognition that their party's obsession with gender ideology contributed to its humiliating electoral losses in 2024, Democrats have largely spent the past two years draped in the LGBT flag, defending so-called "gender-affirming care" and cross-dressing men in women's sports. With the midterm election just weeks away, Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio has joined other vulnerable Democrats in changing her tune on trans extremism.'Your words create deep emotional harm.'Kaptur was long a darling of the LGBT advocacy group Human Rights Campaign and like-minded activists. After all, she co-sponsored legislation that would prohibit public accommodations and federally funded programs from discriminating on the basis of so-called "gender identity" and voted in opposition to the Department of War's ban on military "dudes in dresses."The congresswoman has, however, signaled a new approach in recent ads.In one ad titled "Say No," Kaptur noted that she has "said no to gender ideology in schools." In a second ad pushed online late last month, she stated, "I voted with Republicans to keep transgender ideology out of our schools."In both instances, she was referring to how she voted with Republicans in May to pass the Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act, which would require public elementary schools to obtain parental consent before changing a kid's pronouns or sex-based accommodations.According to Blaze News' Poll Watch, Kaptur, the longest-serving woman in congressional history, is currently neck and neck with Republican Derek Merrin, whom she beat by only a few thousand votes in 2024.RELATED: Trans radical who massacred kids in Canadian school allegedly had American support Kaptur's late-stage flip-flop has, of course, enraged the usual suspects.Upon seeing one of Kaptur's ads, Erin Reed, the romantic partner of cross-dressing Montana state Rep. Zooey Zephyr (D), wrote, "This is getting out of control," adding, "Do NOT vote for anti-transgender Democrats."Former Kaptur intern Nick Fulton whined in the pages of the Buckeye Flame that "as a 27-year-old working journalist who challenges oppression and interrogates transphobia daily, I am embarrassed at Rep. Kaptur’s name on my resume. So much so that I removed it.""Rep. Kaptur might win over some far-right transphobes with this ad, but she is losing her integrity — and every queer voter who thought that her democratic membership meant allyship," added Fulton.The non-straight advocacy group Equality Ohio slapped Kaptur with a D-grade, noting that while she at one time "earned a 100% rating from the Human Rights Campaign," she "recently released anti-trans ads."Lucas County Stonewall Democrats published a letter on Sept. 21 demanding that Kaptur take down her "transphobic ad" immediately, stating, "Not only do your words create deep emotional harm and place an unnecessary spotlight on our Trans community members, putting them in more danger than they already are given the current climate, but you have also now engaged in a race to the bottom with Republicans."The Christopher Steele Project, a trans advocacy group, whined, "We can want Democrats to win and secure a Democratic majority while also recognizing that the queer community’s organized political power does not have to fund the first Democrats willing to abandon us."Alienating her radical base may not have been worthwhile since Republicans have already framed Kaptur's about-face as little more than naked election-time opportunism.Her opponent, Derek Merrin, said at his rally with President Donald Trump on Saturday, "Marcy Kaptur is desperate to hold onto power. She is resorting to the typical career politician handbook: slander your opponent, distort the facts, and hope voters don't check the record.""Marcy Kaptur is claiming that she no longer wants men to be able to play in women's sports," said Merrin. "The problem is she's voted two times against a bill that would have prohibited that practice. She's also co-sponsored six times the radical Equality Act that would allow men to play women's sports and allow men into women's locker rooms."National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Zach Bannon told Fox News Digital, "Lies from desperate Democrat Marcy Kaptur can't erase her radical record. Kaptur is in damage control, and she must remove herself as a co-sponsor of the Equality Act and disavow her previous votes or remove her lies from the airwaves."Kaptur's change in messaging strategy comes months after Ohio gubernatorial candidate Amy Acton (D) was downgraded by Equality Ohio after she claimed that she does "not support boys playing in girls' sports"; weeks after Democrat U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico of Texas walked back his support for men in girls' sports "if it risks safety or fairness"; and days after North Carolina Rep. Don Davis (D) released a commercial in which he states that "there should always be a safe and fair space for women and girls in sports."Pew Research Center surveys found last year that:73% of Americans are uncomfortable with trans-identifying athletes competing against members of the opposite sex; 66% favored requiring athletes to compete against members of their sex; 56% support making it illegal for health care professionals to provide minors with "medical care for a gender transition"; 49% support requiring trans-identifying people to use public bathrooms that match their sex; and 47% favor or strongly favor making it illegal for public schools to push gender ideology in elementary schools. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Vulnerable Ohio Democrat's Last-Minute Flip-Flop on Trans Insanity Has LGBT Activists Crying

Patriots QB reveals he has taken classes in conspiracy theories — and there's one major US event he is skeptical about

The 24-year-old quarterback for the New England Patriots may be only a couple of years removed from college, but he has still had plenty of time to look into conspiracy theories.In fact, his time in college actually academically contributed to his knowledge of mysterious events.'I took a conspiracy class in college.'Drake Maye spent 2021-2023 at North Carolina and revealed in a recent interview that he has been doing some heavy reading.Not only did he graduate from college early, the third overall pick in the 2024 NFL Draft earned All-ACC Academic Team honors in 2023 and graduated with a 3.2 GPA.On Monday, the quarterback let the hosts at WEEI 93.7 FM in on his own secret: "I took a conspiracy class in college."This meant that Maye was prepared when he was asked by a fan which "wild conspiracy theory" does he rather believe in.Maye prefaced his answer by saying that he didn't want to get too controversial on the air, and after remarking on the thick New England accent of the caller, he replied: "I don't know about the moon [landing], you know?"Maye's answer had one radio host elated, who felt he was now in lockstep with his local quarterback."I think it's —" Maye began as he pondered the theory. "I can see back in the day of why we would put on the mask if we went there, but I'm not really sure 200% if we went there or not. I wouldn't say I'm leaning one way or the other. I just know I'm a little bit skeptical."RELATED: Flock of Ravens swarm President Trump in Baltimore: 'Do yall know this guy?' The Huntersville, North Carolina, native seemed fairly well versed in conspiracy theories overall. While Maye said he is "not 200% sure" of the validity of the lunar landing, he did have the opportunity to participate in other wild discussions in college, too."Hitler being alive" was another theory Maye recalled hearing in the classroom, and "are birds real?" was another.Maye described those as "some of the classic ones that you hear about."The host rejoiced in Maye's apparent revelations and said he believed director Stanley Kubrick was behind the camera for the moon-landing hoax. But the radio personalities did have questions about Maye's knowledge on birds being fake. Maye answered with the following: "Just, like, the government has a say in some of the, you know, things, you know, birds flying around and whether they're videoing or listening or something along the lines of that."Fair enough.RELATED: Fans accuse Chicago Bears player of performing Muslim prayer during national anthem: 'Is this respectful?' HUM Images/Universal Images Group/Getty Images Belief in the 1969 lunar landing depends heavily on time and geographical location.While some outlets reported that Americans' doubt in the lunar landings exploded in the 1970s, those numbers cannot be substantiated and may connect public sentiment to the release of the 1978 film "Capricorn One," which focuses on a faked mission to Mars.A 1999 Gallup poll showed that just 6% of Americans thought the moon landing was faked.Across the Atlantic, 52% of more than a thousand British people polled in 2016 said the landing was faked.As for the other side of the Cold War, in 2000, 28% of respondents in a Russian survey said they thought America never went to the moon. Interestingly, 16% said they had never heard of American astronauts landing on the moon in 1969.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Patriots QB reveals he has taken classes in conspiracy theories — and there's one major US event he is skeptical about

France has been ‘brought to its knees by thugs’ — and it’s time to talk about why

What began as student demonstrations over overcrowded classrooms and deteriorating schools has erupted into riots, fires, arrests, and what French officials describe as "urban violence."The chaos unfolding in France reflects a deeper crisis that extends far beyond education policy. Rather, it shines a light on immigration, assimilation, and public safety. “How did we ever get to this point?” one French woman asked in a video posted to social media. “France, like this jewel of European civilization, a country of extraordinary cultural wealth, brought to its knees by thugs with an IQ of 80? They only understand force, and we are too weak. We need to get rid of all empathy.”“These people hate us and would like to see us dead, so we will never co-exist peacefully,” she continued. “I love this statement. The peaceful solution,” BlazeTV host Nick Freitas comments. “The peaceful solution is to say, ‘Hey, look, we let you into our country for whatever reason. We let you into our country. You obviously don’t like our country. We can tell by all the fires and riots and murders and rapes ... so you’re going to go back,’” he says. “That is a perfectly reasonable position to take,” he continues. “And yet, I promise you, if France actually tried to deport, because French deportation numbers are pathetic. It’s something like less than one in 10 of immigrants in France that actually have a deportation order.” “If you don’t do that one, if you allow them to stay, and you allow it to grow, well then, eventually, what’s going to happen?” he asks, noting that France will become unrecognizable. “French people that don’t want to have their country turn into the places that these immigrants fled from are going to have to fight,” he says. “The question is how do they do it? Because this is one thing I will remind all of my European friends as you regularly mock the United States for our gun deaths.”Freitas points out that while almost all of America’s "gun deaths take place in 2% of the counties,” the American people “actually have the means to push back against a government that would completely ignore the voting public.” “We actually have a federalist system that allows for state authority to provide some sort of pushback against federal authority,” he says, before asking, “Where do you have that in Europe?” “Making the Argument with Nick Freitas” is available on BlazeTV+, YouTube, and major podcast platforms.Start watching Nick Freitas NOW at blazetv.com and use the promo code NICK for $20 off your BlazeTV+ subscription.

Cover image for France has been ‘brought to its knees by thugs’ — and it’s time to talk about why

JD Vance announces MASSIVE crackdown on companies and universities replacing Americans with foreigners

Vice President JD Vance says Microsoft and other firms have been suspended from a program temporary H-1B visa holders often use to gain permanent residency in the United StatesThe Trump administration has heavily criticized companies for allegedly abusing the H-1B program, replacing Americans at high-paying jobs with foreign workers.'You cannot lay off American workers and then replace them with foreign indentured servants.'"Our message to Microsoft is, you're a great American company, but you've got to hire great American workers," Vance said at a press conference Thursday. "You cannot lay off American workers and then replace them with foreign indentured servants."Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling said Microsoft, Adobe, Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL, and Capgemini have been suspended from access to the Permanent Labor Certification Program that allows employers to sponsor H-1B visa holders for permanent residency.Sonderling said that the suspended firms have requested nearly 3 million foreign workers since 2009. The firms also had more than 230,000 H-1B visa approvals and more than 100,000 permanent labor certifications.Microsoft alone had laid off 6,000 American workers just last year while receiving 6,300 H-1B visas for foreign workers and nearly 3,000 green cards, according to Vance.RELATED: How the H-1B visa replaces American workers Vance added that they will suspend PERM access for Microsoft "until they show that they are going to get serious about putting American workers first."The administration has also served subpoenas and opened investigations into alleged visa abuse at Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Brown, the University of Pittsburgh, UC Davis, Caltech, Arizona State, and MIT."Nobody will be getting a free pass because their name is carved into an expensive building," said Labor Department Inspector General Anthony D’Esposito.Microsoft responded in a lengthy press release that claimed the vast majority of their H-1B applications in the last fiscal year were not new arrivals but people already in the U.S., or re-applications for current workers. "We believe in the strength and talent of the American workforce. That is why the vast majority of Microsoft employees in the United States are Americans," read the statement in part. "Microsoft only files H-1B petitions for those who meet the rigorous standards of this visa category," the company added. "We pay our employees some of the highest compensation in the tech sector, and our wages are among the highest of all H-1B filings. We pay our H-1B employees the same as any other employees doing comparable work." Editor's note: This article has been edited after publication to include the Microsoft press release.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for JD Vance announces MASSIVE crackdown on companies and universities replacing Americans with foreigners

Florida thug attacks elderly woman feeding stray cats in middle of night. But she makes him pay dearly.

A 77-year-old woman was in the parking lot of a Florida veterinary clinic before 4:30 a.m. Monday when investigators said a male attacked her, WJXT-TV reported.The woman was at the Macclenny location at that hour because she regularly volunteers to feed community cats at local businesses, Baker County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Dave Mancini told the station later that day.'We usually don’t have things like that happen here.'Mancini added to WJXT that deputies and county residents know the woman well because of her work in animal rescue.Deputies responded to the parking lot following reports of gunfire, the station said, adding that the 77-year-old woman opened fire in self-defense at the male who attacked her.The male in question was identified as 57-year-old Alvin Tyrone Tisdale of Macclenny, WJXT said, adding that he was taken to UF Health in downtown Jacksonville, where he died from his injuries.The sheriff's office told the station that the woman called 911 to report the shooting and has been cooperating with law enforcement; no arrests have been made, and the shooting remains under investigation.Veterinary hospital staff noted to WJXT that they arrived for work after the shooting scene had been cleared and did not witness the incident.RELATED: Top 5 of 2025: Women who fought back when coming face-to-face with crooks Local residents were shocked by the incident but were grateful that the woman was able to defend herself, the station said.“We usually don’t have things like that happen here. It’s unfortunate for sure,” Todd McRae told WJXT, adding that while he is sad about the violence, he is glad that the woman protected herself.Another Macclenny resident, Samuriah Major, told the station that she feels similarly: “I feel like everyone should use self-defense in that scenario, but it’s sad on both ends. Domestic violence is real these days, and women reacting and defending themselves, finally standing up for themselves, because usually in this case it would be the woman dying.”Those with information about the incident are asked to contact the sheriff’s office at 904-259-0251 or submit an anonymous tip to First Coast Crime Stoppers at 866-845-8477.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Florida thug attacks elderly woman feeding stray cats in middle of night. But she makes him pay dearly.

Exclusive: US ambassador says Canada walked away from 'the best trade deal' — twice

United States Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra says Washington has lost patience with Prime Minister Mark Carney's handling of trade negotiations — and sees little reason to make further concessions.“We thought we had reached an agreement on two occasions with Canada. On two occasions now, Canada has walked away from an agreement,” Hoekstra said in an interview with Blaze News. “As people from our side look at it, you know, this is the best trade agreement that anybody in the world has been offered. And if that's not good enough for Canada, you know, hey, we'll wait. We'll wait for Canada to come back and … ask to go back to the negotiating table.”'If the Canadian government wants the Canadians to see the elements of a trade deal, it's the Canadian government's responsibility to release them.'Hoekstra suggested that repairing relations will require more than resolving differences over tariffs. Anti-American rhetoric from Canada's federal and provincial governments, he said, has changed how Washington views its northern neighbor.Hard bargain“We no longer necessarily view Canada as Canadians liking America. You have multiple numbers of your premiers who are saying, ‘Do not travel to the United States.’ I think you now have 11 provinces and territories that ban American alcohol. You have another that has put 50% tariffs on it. So that's 12 out of 13.”The ambassador was particularly incredulous at Carney's characterization of the trade dispute.“You call a trade disagreement where, for a period of time, you were getting 93% to 95% of trade across the border tariff-free … you call that a trade war, OK?”Canada's rejection of the proposed agreement remains a source of contention. Carney has argued that American negotiators demanded concessions that would compromise Canadian sovereignty, including protections for French-language rights and Quebec culture. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has disputed Canada's characterization of the negotiations.Carney has refused to release the proposed agreement, even to Official Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre, leaving Canadians unable to examine the terms for themselves.Asked whether Washington would make the proposal public, Hoekstra placed the responsibility squarely on Ottawa.“If the Canadian government wants the Canadians to see the elements of a trade deal, it's the Canadian government's responsibility to release them. We have decided not to release them.”European vacationMeanwhile, Carney has been pursuing closer economic and political ties with the European Union. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently floated the possibility of making Canada the EU's first “associate member,” an arrangement whose terms have yet to be defined.Hoekstra indicated that Washington would assess the consequences once Ottawa decides how far it intends to go.“We're more than willing to let Canada go through this process, determine exactly what it's going to do with the EU as an associate member, and we'll then take a look at how that may impact the relationship with the United States, either militarily or economically.”Canada's growing relationship with China is another source of friction. Hoekstra warned that steel, aluminum, and other Chinese materials could enter the United States through Canadian products, circumventing American trade restrictions.“Transshipment is a huge irritant,” he said.Hoekstra argued that the practice allows Chinese producers to compete unfairly with American manufacturers.“It's not putting Canadians to work except maybe shaping the steel and the aluminum, but it's putting Americans out of work through unfair competition because they are using ... in some cases ... slave labor."RELATED: Want to avoid fixing Canada's problems? Just blame Trump. Bloomberg/Shauna Clinton/Getty ImagesMission to Mars?The ambassador was less concerned about the possibility of an outright military confrontation between the two countries.Asked about a recent New York Times interview in which Carney acknowledged considering the “extreme tail risk” of an American invasion of Canada, Hoekstra recalled an American general's response to a similar question in Vancouver.“I think one of our generals answered that question very effectively when he was asked about this a couple of weeks ago in Vancouver. ‘Yeah, and after that, why don't you ask me about our plans to invade … the Martian soil.’”Hoekstra's outspoken style has irritated Canadian politicians, some of whom have even supported a petition to have him sent back to Washington.The ambassador joked that not all of the petition's supporters would be Canadian.“If you see an American out in front of Parliament gathering signatures, it very well could be my wife.”

Cover image for Exclusive: US ambassador says Canada walked away from 'the best trade deal' — twice

Lawsuit alleges McDonald's is rigging its prices based on location — and algorithm

When the first McDonald's restaurant opened in 1940, computers as we know them didn't exist yet.Today, they could be the reason it's seemingly unaffordable to eat fast food.'AI does not set the price of a Big Mac or ⁠any other menu item.'A lawsuit filed in federal court in Chicago is alleging that higher prices at McDonald's are a result of price-fixing by way of an AI-powered algorithm.The Chicago lawsuit claims the fast-food company illegally coordinates menu prices across franchises in the United States, using an AI pricing system that analyzes customer data on an ongoing basis.The accusation argues that the algorithm tracks millions of daily transactions from its approximately 14,000 restaurants and generates pricing recommendations to its franchisees, the Daily Mail reported.This would allow the prices to move in tandem or simply rise based on an AI estimation of how much customers in a specific area may be willing to pay."Independent businesses must set their prices independently," the lawsuit said, per Reuters.In fact, a Reuters investigation is cited in the lawsuit, which revealed a 21% markup between two McDonald's locations just minutes away from one another.The report said that in September, a store in Fresno, California, was selling a Big Mac for $5.69, while another location just two miles away had its Big Mac priced at $6.89.RELATED: Yes, groceries are more expensive. Now what? Tim Boyle/Newsmakers "AI does not set the price of a Big Mac or ⁠any other menu item," McDonald's reportedly said in response to the lawsuit. The golden-arched restaurant also stated that franchisees make their own pricing decisions and that the use of pricing recommendations using tools or analytics is widespread throughout the fast-food industry.The aforementioned report noted that McDonald's CEO Chris Kempczinski told investors in 2023 that the company had developed its own tools to evaluate pricing at individual restaurants. That same year, a location in Connecticut was allegedly told to charge $18 for a Big Mac meal at a location next to a state turnpike.The franchisee has an ongoing lawsuit against the company, with McDonald's having disputed the details and saying the entrepreneur repeatedly breached franchise agreements.RELATED: Is this why everyone gets into fights at Taco Bell? Charles-McClintock Wilson/NurPhoto/Getty Images In the new lawsuit, a lawyer for the plaintiff said in a statement that McDonald's is "leveraging its troves of data and its franchised system to nickel-and-dime consumers down to ⁠the last French fry."The plaintiff is reportedly seeking to represent millions of customers in a class-action lawsuit.Blaze News previously reported on the spike in fast-food prices, which have steadily outpaced inflation rates in recent decades. McDonald's was one of the named culprits, but Taco Bell was identified as the biggest alleged price inflator.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Lawsuit alleges McDonald's is rigging its prices based on location — and algorithm

Republicans cannot serve two masters on immigration

Eleven years after Donald Trump’s rise, the Republican Party still has not broken with the business interests that depend on cheap, abundant migrant labor. A handful of conservatives want to shut off the employment spigot and reduce both illegal and legal immigration. But too much of the party remains willing to protect longtime illegal workers in agriculture, expand guest-worker programs, or legalize workers already here when employers insist they cannot operate without them.That’s the real fault line. Almost every Republican says border chaos is bad. The harder test comes when immigration enforcement raises labor costs for industries dependent upon a large foreign workforce.When a party’s voters and its governing class want fundamentally different things on a defining issue, eventually the contradiction must break somewhere.For years, Republicans have talked about focusing deportations on criminal aliens while treating workers in agriculture, hospitality, and other favored industries differently. That approach leaves the cheap labor pipeline largely intact. If employers can continue hiring illegal labor with little consequence, the incentive to come and remain does not disappear.Republicans simply won’t protect our nation’s sovereignty. Instead, they build up a false dichotomy that points to one solution: amnesty.Senator Jim Justice (R-W.Va.) made the tension explicit last month. He told Politico that ICE can get “carried away” and questioned “dragging people away that have lived on your street corner for 15 years.” He later issued a statement saying he supports Trump’s immigration strategy “full stop,” while emphasizing the removal of dangerous criminals.Justice serves one of the most anti-illegal alien states. He did not endorse blanket amnesty outright. He didn’t need to. His comments reveal how quickly the politics change once enforcement reaches local industries and communities that have become addicted to illegal labor.The same pressure surfaced in southwest Kansas after ICE operations disrupted meatpacking towns. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) complained that local law enforcement had not received adequate notice and said the operations caused “mass disruptions to local communities and businesses.” Enforcement, he said, should be done “in a responsible and secure manner.” Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) likewise urged coordination with local police and said DHS told him the operation targeted people with criminal warrants.Their complaint was about tactics and coordination, not ICE’s legal authority to remove illegal aliens. Still, the episode underscores the problem: Enforcement remains popular in the abstract until it collides with an employer’s workforce. Clearly, the problem is worse than we thought.Rep. María Elvira Salazar (R) of Florida has gone further. In a campaign ad, she told Trump that some enforcement efforts had “gone too far” and said Hispanic voters who backed him in 2024 “feel betrayed.” Salazar explicitly said she was not proposing amnesty. But she has long favored a “legal-status framework” for many illegal immigrants already living and working here. In other words, amnesty.RELATED: Kansas Republicans muddy the waters on ICE enforcement Pat Greenhouse/The Boston Globe/Getty ImagesThe guest-worker side of the equation is even clearer.House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn Thompson (R-Penn.) introduced the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act with 50 co-sponsors. The bill would allow H-2A labor certifications lasting up to three years, make it easier to transfer guest workers between employers, and let certain illegal farmworkers who were already here and had worked in agriculture apply for H-2A status. That is not citizenship, but it is a legalization mechanism tied directly to agricultural employment.The administration has moved in the same direction on temporary labor. For fiscal year 2026, DHS and the Labor Department authorized up to 64,716 additional H-2B visas on top of the statutory cap for seasonal non-agricultural workers.H-2A has no numerical cap. In October 2025, the Labor Department changed the methodology used to set the program’s minimum wage. The department itself estimated the rule would produce $2.46 billion in annualized wage transfers from H-2A workers to employers. A federal judge ruled the methodology unlawful in August but did not vacate the rule, leaving the wage rates in place while the litigation continues.Whatever one thinks of the legal dispute, the economic direction is obvious: Washington is making foreign farm labor cheaper and easier to use.In July, Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.) led a bipartisan letter — joined by six Republican senators and a number of House Republicans endorsed by Trump — asking the administration to reduce processing delays and structural barriers in the H-2A program. The letter did not ask Congress to raise a visa cap, because H-2A has none. It asked the executive branch to make the existing pipeline work more smoothly.Sadly, this is not a fringe position inside the GOP. The cheap-labor lobby remains deeply embedded in the party’s agricultural and business wings.Consider Nebraska. Gov. Jim Pillen (R) has embraced Trump’s immigration-enforcement agenda, yet a New York Times and Flatwater Free Press investigation found that Pillen Family Farms had employed undocumented workers at at least 20 hog farms. Court records showed at least a dozen workers charged with using fake or stolen IDs between 2015 and 2024. Pillen and the company say they never knowingly hired illegal workers and that the business now uses E-Verify. Still, it’s worth noting that Pillen’s farms have never been raided by ICE.RELATED: The promise was mass deportation. The policy is carve-outs. Al Drago/Bloomberg/Getty ImagesRepublicans often treat illegal farm labor as the least objectionable form of illegal immigration. In reality, it may be among the most transformative.Over the past few decades, large agricultural employers have reshaped rural communities across the Great Plains by relying heavily on immigrant labor. In Schuyler, Nebraska, roughly three-quarters of the population is Hispanic, while 27% of students in the Central Nebraska school district are foreign-born — figures more commonly associated with major metropolitan areas like New York and San Francisco.The political divide is less about whether mass immigration transforms communities than about where that transformation occurs. Democratic interests tend to favor it in large cities; Republican-aligned agricultural interests have helped bring it to rural America.When a party’s voters and its governing class want fundamentally different things on a defining issue, eventually the contradiction must break somewhere. The Republican Party itself was born in 1854 when the old party system fractured over the expansion of slavery into the territories.If Republicans cannot choose between an immigration policy built around American workers and one built around employers’ demand for ever more labor, voters may eventually make the choice for them — and let this party go the way of the Whigs.

Cover image for Republicans cannot serve two masters on immigration

#IAmJaneDoe goes viral — but TikTok isn’t a courtroom

#IAmJaneDoe is trending after sexual assault allegations were levied against seven fraternity members at Cornell University by one woman, known as Jane Doe.While TikTokers across the globe have picked up the story and have begun speaking out in defense of the young woman, BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey points out that social media outrage is not a substitute for due process.“You’ve met Jane Doe before,” one TikToker said, in protest of the accused. “You might not have realized it at the time, but you have. You may have passed her in the street. She could have poured the milk into your coffee or helped deliver your wife’s baby, read your kid a story.”“You might have said good morning to her on a walk,” she continued. “There’s a chance that Jane Doe has smiled at you as you’ve held open the door. Jane could even live in your house. She could put the kettle on after a long day, always know where your keys are, but has never made it known that she is Jane Doe.”Another TikToker said that it broke her heart that “the guy that invited her to the frat house that night was her friend.”She went on to claim that Jane Doe was a “minor,” which Stuckey explains is not true.“She wasn’t a minor. I just want to say that. She wasn’t a minor. She was under 21. She was illegally drinking,” she says.“These men were not her friend,” she continues.“None of these men were her friend, because this is not what friends do. This is not what people do who respect another human being, respect women, respect anyone. They should have helped her get a ride home. If they noticed that she was intoxicated, they shouldn’t have propositioned her for group sex.”However, Stuckey notes that “she also shouldn’t have participated.”“She shouldn’t have been there. She shouldn’t have been doing drugs. She shouldn’t have been drinking. She shouldn’t have consented to any of this,” she says.“Am I saying that she is responsible for every bit of it? Am I saying for sure that there was never a time that she couldn’t consent? I don’t know,” she answers. “Am I saying that because she said once that is saying yes every single time and so there is no part of the night where she became a victim?”Stuckey explains that while she’s “not saying that for sure,” you also “can’t say anything for sure.”“That is the point that I am making, that it is her word against these men’s word,” she says.“And I will not just assume that she is correct because she’s a woman or she is correct because she is an accuser,” she adds.Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for #IAmJaneDoe goes viral — but TikTok isn’t a courtroom

6 ways Apple Watch can save your life

Apple Watch is many things — a techie timepiece, a notification aggregator, and perhaps a vital lifeline in an emergency. While some medical events are impossible to predict, you might be surprised to know that you have more early detection tools within reach than you think. Here are six features on Apple Watch that could save your life.From the early days of Apple Watch, the Cupertino tech giant has focused heavily on fitness features to prolong longevity. Heart rate tracking, exercise goals, and activity badges can all help users lead healthier, more active lives. We’re not talking about those today, though. We’re looking at a set of features that can help you detect health problems you didn’t know you had and, in some cases, alert emergency services if you become incapacitated during a serious medical event. It can tell you things you didn’t know about your body so you can seek care before an alert becomes a serious event — or worse.To make the most of this guide, you’ll need a compatible Apple Watch, as well as a paired iPhone. However, the first couple of items are also iPhone-centric, so even if you don’t have all the necessary hardware, you can still enjoy some extra peace of mind.Medical IDMedical ID is the hub where you can store all of your important medical information — your name, age, medications, allergies, list of emergency contacts, health conditions, height, weight, and any other notes you wish to include.To set up Medical ID, open the Settings app on iPhone, tap on “Apps” at the bottom, then “Health,” and finally, “Medical ID.” Then select “edit” in each section to add your information.Not only is this a neat record to track your own health data, but Medical ID is also easily accessible to anyone who can reach your phone. Why? Because if you’re having a medical event, a stranger, a paramedic, or a health care worker may need quick access to your health conditions to help figure out what’s wrong. To bring up Medical ID, power on any iPhone from the lock screen, let the passcode fail to authenticate, then tap “Emergency” in the bottom left corner, and tap “Medical ID.”Emergency SOSEmergency SOS works well in two situations. If you’re having a medical event and you’re still conscious, or if you’re in trouble and in need of emergency services, trigger the emergency command. Your phone will automatically dial 911 and alert your emergency contacts that something is wrong. This way, you’re connected to the people who matter most so that they can come to your aid if you’re in a dangerous situation.To set up Emergency SOS, open the Settings app, tap on “Emergency SOS” near the bottom of the page, and comb through the settings. This part is important — you can customize the emergency call trigger to dial when you hold and release the side button and the volume button together, or simply when you push the power button five times in a row. Choose the option you’re most likely to remember during a medical event.Make sure your emergency contacts are added to this page so that they receive your SOS alerts alongside emergency services.RELATED: After a decade-long wait, Apple Watch just got the one feature it always needed most Apple Watch Series 12/AppleCrash detectionWhile we’re in the Emergency SOS section, find Crash Detection near the bottom of the screen. This feature uses your iPhone and Apple Watch to measure jarring movements via their internal sensors. If the motion is severe enough that the devices think you’ve been in a car accident, they will begin a noisy countdown to let you know that they’re about to call emergency services on your behalf.If you’re awake and unharmed, you can disable the alarm before the call goes out. However, if you’re unconscious, a call will be made to emergency services and your emergency contacts. This will let them know that you were in an accident and that you need help.Crash detection is available on Apple Watch Series 8 and up.Fall detectionIn addition to crash detection, your watch uses the same sensors to estimate if and when you suddenly fall off your feet and hit the ground. If the impact is hard enough, your phone will send an alert that it’s about to dial emergency services and your emergency contacts. If you didn’t actually fall, or if you survived the fall without a critical injury, you can dismiss the alert. However, if you’re unconscious or severely injured, the call will go through and help will be on the way.To enable fall detection, open the Watch app on iPhone, tap “Emergency SOS,” and check that “Fall detection” is turned on.Fall detection is available on Apple Watch Series 4 and up.Heart notificationsThe heart rate sensor on Apple Watch isn’t just meant for tracking activity and workouts. It also monitors your heart throughout the day, and it’s sensitive enough to pick up on slight rhythm changes, sometimes before you’re even aware they’re happening.High heart rate alerts will tell you if your heart exceeds a certain limit — 120 BPM by default — while you’re at rest. If you receive this alert, you could be stressed, dehydrated, or you may be having a serious heart event, like atrial fibrillation.Low heart rate alerts do the opposite — they’ll tell you when your heart rate dips too long, which is 40 BPM by default. An extremely low heart rate at rest could signify a problem with one of your medications, certain medical conditions like hypothyroidism, or heart disease.Irregular rhythm notifications measure your heartbeat, looking for signs of atrial fibrillation where your heart beats out of rhythm. Brief episodes of AFib may not be an emergency, but if you receive this notification often, it’s best to see your doctor for a thorough checkup.Hypertension notifications analyze your heart rate data for silent signs that you have high blood pressure. Apple’s software notes that not everyone who has high blood pressure will fit into their detection algorithm, but many people do. If you get this alert, it’s best to monitor your blood pressure daily for several weeks and let your doctor know if you have a real problem.To enable heart notifications, open the Watch app on iPhone, scroll to the bottom and select “Apps,” then choose “Heart.” Then on this screen, make sure each feature is enabled.Irregular rhythm detection is only available on Apple Watch Series 4 and up, while hypertension notifications are exclusively for Series 9 and up.RELATED: Someone else's Apple Watch might start spying on your conversations bombuscreative/Getty ImagesSleep apneaSleep apnea, or an event where you briefly stop breathing at night, is a silent killer, and approximately 80% of patients don’t know they have it. Luckily, Apple Watch can help shed some light on any potential breathing issues you have at night.Simply wear Apple Watch to bed, and it will monitor your breathing rate and oxygen levels to identify potential problems. If sleep disturbances are detected, it will let you know the next morning. While one or two breathing alerts may not indicate a chronic issue, regular alerts should prompt a visit to the doctor. You’ll likely want to get a formal sleep study to confirm whether or not you have sleep apnea so that you can treat it properly.Sleep apnea alerts are available on Apple Watch Series 9 and up.A real lifesaverAs you can see, Apple Watch isn’t just a fancy piece of jewelry or an expensive gadget that pairs with your phone. It can be a critical lifeline between you, your health, and emergency services. Even more importantly, it can tell you things you didn’t know about your body so you can seek care before an alert becomes a serious event — or worse.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for 6 ways Apple Watch can save your life

Pastor takes a stand after Iowa city council starts official business with 'hail Satan' prayer: 'Reverse that curse'

An apparent fetishization of religious "diversity" had officials in an Iowa city permit a satanic invocation prior to conducting official business on Tuesday. While many at the meeting appeared willing to put up with the infernal appeal, one Christian man stood up and spoke out.How it startedOttumwa, a city in Southeast Iowa, adopted a policy on Jan. 20 allowing for invocations to be given at the start of official city council meetings.'That's not welcome here."'This policy is intended to acknowledge and express the City Council's respect for the diversity of both organized and unorganized religious denominations, as well as other faiths, belief systems, or the lack thereof, represented and practiced among the citizens of the City of Ottumwa," the policy states.Per the policy, invocational speakers are to be "selected without preference to any specific religion, belief, faith, or ideology, from amongst a diverse pool of Ottumwa citizens" and are asked not to proselytize, disparage other beliefs, and to keep their invocation under two minutes in length.Summoning the devilMatthew Dalbey, a former Ottumwa city council member, seized upon the opportunity not only to offer a prayer down to the devil but to violate the city's policy by taking a general dig at the beliefs of others."Let us pray," started Dalbey. "Dear dark father, let us stand now unbowed and unfettered by arcane doctrines born of fearful minds in darkened times. Let us embrace the Luciferian impulse to eat of the tree of knowledge and dissipate our blissful and comforting delusions of old."RELATED: Inside the mind of a Catholic exorcist: Fr. Chad Ripperger talks shop with Shawn Ryan Dalbey is a member of the Iowa chapter of the Satanic Temple. While Dalbey told KTVO-TV that he and other members of the Satanic Temple don't actually believe in Satan or worship him, the anti-Christian group and its members certainly behave as though they do.After all, in recent years, the Satanic Temple has erected statues of Baphomet on government property around Christmastime; offered expectant mothers telehealth abortion services and promoted an "abortion ritual"; challenged pro-life legislation; distributed satanic literature to children; publicly performed "unbaptisms"; held a demonization ceremony in protest of the canonization of the Catholic Spanish priest Junípero Serra; and promoted euthanasia and pornography.After imploring the devil to help the Iowans present to turn against ancient beliefs and deriding "arbitrary social norms," Dalbey championed "agnosticism in all things" and called for opposition against any "arbitrary authority that threatens the personal sovereignty of one or all."The radical concluded his prayer with "hail Satan."Righteous indignationNew Life Center Pastor Rick Bick refused to let the satanic prayer go unchecked.Bick — who made an invocation prior to a council meeting earlier this year and is set to do so again in December — declared, "Let's just reverse that curse that was just put on our city.""That ending with, 'hail Satan' and 'hail dark god'?" continued the pastor. "That's not welcome here."I am a Christian man with Christian values so I chose not to participate.'Bick reiterated that the satanic prayer was a curse on this city and noted, "Most of you know that, and we just need to stop and reverse it."Ottumwa Mayor Benjamin Foote attempted to defuse the situation by calling for a "moment of silence to reflect on whatever it is we need to reflect on at this time."Cara Galloway, the council member who cast the lone vote against the invocation policy in January and reportedly warned about the inevitability of a satanic prayer, noted at the end of the meeting on Tuesday that selectively objecting to invocations now may expose taxpayers to legal liability.The City of Ottumwa issued a statement on Tuesday, noting, "It is very clear that many of you have watched at least the first two minutes of the October 6 City Council meeting."The city underscored that it "cannot discriminate against a denomination and everyone that is invited to perform the invocation has followed the correct protocol."Councilman Bill Hoffman told Blaze News, "We as elected officials are not aware of the content before hand. In my opinion, I do not believe this one invocation expresses the beliefs of most of Ottumwa.""Personally as a councilman, I only speak for myself, I did not stay in the room during the invocation as I do not agree with the content," continued Hoffman. "I am a Christian man with Christian values so I chose not to participate, and I stepped into the hallway and did a personal prayer to God for strength and wisdom for myself and to watch over our city."Other members of the council and Mayor Foote did not immediately respond to Blaze News' requests for comment.The satanic invocation has prompted widespread outrage."WTF," tweeted BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales.Former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines wrote, "Jesus, come back now."BlazeTV host Steve Deace suggested, however, that it is par for the course in the Hawkeye State: "To be fair, Democrat candidate for congress @SarahforIowa does preside over Satanic weddings."Sarah Trone Garriott, a leftist Lutheran minister who is presently running against Republican Rep. Zach Nunn, has helped oversee at least one "wedding" for satanists. In 2023, she discussed her efforts to accommodate disciples of the fallen on their big day, going so far as to consider readings about the devil "to make them feel more comfortable."As of Thursday morning, Blaze News' Poll Watch has Nunn with a 6-point lead. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Pastor takes a stand after Iowa city council starts official business with 'hail Satan' prayer: 'Reverse that curse'

When your desperation becomes part of the price

Prices once reflected the product and the market. Increasingly, they can also reflect what a company knows — or thinks it knows — about you.Surveillance pricing uses personal data, behavioral tracking, and algorithms to estimate what a consumer may be willing to pay. If the system can infer that you are in a hurry, financially stressed, or unlikely to walk away, your vulnerability can become part of the calculation.Companies watch us. We deserve tools to watch them back and make exploitation costly.Websites, apps, and data brokers can collect or infer information from searches, purchases, location, browsing history, and even mouse movements. Combined, those signals can build a detailed profile of what you want and how price-sensitive you may be.The Federal Trade Commission began investigating this market in 2024, issuing orders to eight companies. Its initial findings showed that intermediaries serving at least 250 clients could use granular data to tailor prices, discounts, and product offers. The FTC cautioned that its published examples were “hypothetical.”Surveillance pricing differs from ordinary dynamic pricing, in which prices move with inventory, time, or demand. Surveillance pricing is personal: the price, discount, financing term, or product placement can vary according to a consumer profile or group. The change may be subtle — a withheld discount, a costlier product ranked first, or a different financing offer.The idea is older than the AI boomIn 2012, a Wall Street Journal investigation found that Staples.com displayed different prices after estimating customers’ locations. Shoppers near an OfficeMax or Office Depot were more likely to receive discounts; those farther away could see higher prices for the same item.In 2015, ProPublica found that the Princeton Review offered the same online tutoring package for $6,600 to $8,400 depending on ZIP code. Residents of heavily Asian ZIP codes were 1.8 times as likely to receive the higher price, even in lower-income areas.The company said the pricing reflected regional business conditions rather than race. Regardless, the outcome shows how supposedly neutral data can produce serious demographic disparities.RELATED: Seattle votes to ban grocery ‘surveillance pricing.’ Your data shouldn’t set your food bill. urbazon/Getty ImagesOrbitz also experimented with showing Mac users pricier hotel options first after finding they were more likely to book luxury rooms. It did not charge Mac and PC users different prices for the same room, but the lesson was clear: Even device type can become a signal about what a customer may spend.More recently, a 2025 Consumer Reports investigation found that Instacart’s AI-enabled pricing experiments offered different prices for identical groceries at the same stores and times. About three-quarters of tested products varied, with some differences reaching 23%. The investigation did not show that personal profiles determined who received which price, and Instacart later ended the program. But the experiment showed just how easy it was to target basic needs.Your urgency can become valuable dataThe troubling question is what happens when individualized pricing meets urgency.A search for an emergency plumber at 2 a.m., last-minute airfare after a family crisis, or a baby thermometer at midnight may signal that waiting is not an option. Searches for eviction help, payday loans, or emergency medical care can reveal pressure without a company ever seeing a pay stub or medical record.Economist Benjamin Shiller showed why such information could be valuable. In a 2020 economic model using browsing data to estimate willingness to pay for Netflix, personalized pricing increased simulated profits by 12.99%, versus roughly 0.25% using demographics alone. It was a model, not proof of a retailer secretly charging desperate consumers more, but it showed the commercial value of behavioral data.Data brokers have long packaged financial vulnerability. A 2013 Senate investigation found categories such as “Rural and Barely Making It,” “Retiring on Empty” and “Credit Crunched.” The report warned that such lists could appeal to sellers of high-cost loans looking for people who need quick cash.RELATED: Welcome to the new traffic stop, where it’s your word against AI’s VCG/VCG/Getty ImagesThe balance of power shiftsTwo people can see different prices, discounts, products, or financing offers on the same website and each assume everyone else received the same thing. Algorithms do not need a field labeled race, age, sex, or income to make sensitive inferences; ZIP code, device type, location, and shopping behavior can act as proxies.Targeted pricing is not inherently abusive. It could reward loyal customers or offer discounts to families under pressure. The problem is secrecy: Sellers can know far more about buyers than buyers know about the offer in front of them.That imbalance can turn personal data into a tool for extracting the highest price a consumer will accept. It also weakens comparison shopping when prices quietly change according to profiles the shopper cannot see.Transparency is the minimumCompanies should disclose when personal data or AI materially shapes a price or offer and identify the categories of information involved. Regulators have a role, but entrepreneurs can also build independent tools that compare prices across accounts, devices, and locations.Companies watch us. We need better tools to watch them back.When a company knows you are desperate, that desperation should never become a hidden advantage it can use against you.

Cover image for When your desperation becomes part of the price

Republican emails went to spam. Google denies it was political bias.

Every day, Americans send nearly 10 billion emails. Somewhere in that mountain of messages sits a job application, a customer complaint, a school announcement, a bill, or another annoying update from an organization you intended to unsubscribe from five years ago. Most people assume that when they hit send, their message has every chance of reaching its destination. They trust the system to deliver it. That trust deserves scrutiny.The Republican Party has a $117 million reason to ask questions.The distinction matters far beyond Republican fundraising.A new study by researchers at the University of Iowa and the University of Alabama estimates that Republican fundraising lost $117 million in donations during two periods last year, when Gmail’s spam filters actively diverted campaign emails from supporters’ inboxes. Researchers found that first-time donations fell during those periods. They also reported that inbox placement returned to normal after Google stopped using the Spam URI Real-time Blocklist blacklist in September 2025.Google disputes the study’s methodology, and the research doesn't establish that political bias caused the filtering. But you don't need to be a genius or a tinfoil-hat-wearer to connect the dots. Google's algorithms may be neutral in theory; in practice, however, they have opened up a substantial, and all too predictable, gap in trust. Since the dark days of the Biden years, platform bias is less a conspiracy theory than a documented pattern. Today, elevated skepticism of dismissive claims is hardly unreasonable.A double-edged swordGoogle operates a service used by roughly 90% of the U.S. population. Some 75% of American adults use Gmail. Google’s spam filters perform a necessary job. Nobody wants an inbox packed with fake invoices, phishing attempts, miracle cures, or emails from an incredibly generous Nigerian prince. Spam filtering protects users from fraud and saves them time.The trouble begins when a system designed to keep garbage out also blocks legitimate messages. A campaign email can disappear into a spam folder without the sender knowing why. The recipient may never realize that a message was sent. Everyone involved can go about their day believing that nothing happened.That is a remarkable amount of power for a company to exercise through a setting most users never touch.A government censor has to issue a ban, block a website, or punish a publisher. A technology company, by contrast, can affect what people see through an ordinary technical decision. The message is technically deliverable, yet it may never reach the person expected to receive it.The distinction matters far beyond Republican fundraising. A small business can spend years building a customer list, only to discover that its emails are reaching fewer people. A charity can ask supporters for donations and wonder why the response has fallen. A local organization can send details of an event that nobody seems to know about.The sender may blame a bad subject line or a weak appeal. The recipient may assume the sender has gone quiet. The platform sits between them, and neither party necessarily knows what happened.And a double standard?For conservatives, the new study raises an obvious concern about political communication. Campaigns depend on supporters receiving updates, invitations, and requests for help. If an email provider’s filtering decisions affect one party’s messages more than another’s, the consequences could reach beyond fundraising.The same standard must apply to Democrats, Republicans, independents, and organizations with no political affiliation. A free society depends on people being able to communicate with one another. Private companies have a legitimate role in protecting users from scams. But their decisions should be open to meaningful scrutiny when they have major consequences.With arguably the most consequential midterms in recent history just around the corner, we ought to ask a rather simple question: Who gets to decide which voices reach the American voter?Google says its protections apply equally to everyone. Users can mark messages as spam. They can block senders or unsubscribe from unwanted emails. Those measures give people some control over what arrives in their inboxes. They offer less help when a legitimate message has already been filtered out.RELATED: Seattle votes to ban grocery 'surveillance pricing'. Your data shouldn't set your food bill. urbazon/Getty Images Google’s new verified-sender program for political campaigns and political action committees raises another question. The program allows participating senders to reach inboxes at a higher rate if they meet Google’s policies. Sender verification can help protect users from impersonation and fraud. That is a reasonable goal.The public still deserves to know how the program works. People also deserve to know what standards govern participation and whether the same rules apply consistently. Verifying a sender and giving that sender preferential access to an audience are very different things. Users should be able to understand the distinction.Every reader has a stake in this matter. Email carries information that can affect daily life. A missed job offer can cost someone an opportunity. A filtered school announcement can leave a parent scrambling. A misplaced medical appointment reminder can create an expensive headache. Nobody wants to have to explain to a doctor that Gmail ate the appointment.The $117 million estimate is a symptom of a broader issue. A handful of ridiculously powerful, notoriously deceptive companies control important routes through which Americans communicate and conduct business.That power calls for transparency and a meaningful way to challenge unjustified decisions. Conservatives who believe in competition and individual choice have a particular reason to question a system in which so many people depend on a few private gatekeepers.Americans can hit send whenever they like. The more important question is whether the intended recipient will ever see what they sent.

Cover image for Republican emails went to spam. Google denies it was political bias.