As America approaches its 250th birthday, celebrations will honor its independence and the political thought behind its founding. However, the Declaration of Independence's doctrine of universal truths, such as the equality of all human beings in their natural rights, has become controversial among some younger conservatives. This New Right's dissatisfaction with universalism is seen as a mistaken reaction to political misuses of the founding creed. The article argues there is no conflict between the Declaration's universal principles and "America First" nationalism. Older conservatives, like followers of Ronald Reagan, championed universal truths, but this approach proved insufficient for winning 21st-century elections, leading to a loss of political power. The New Right, emerging after Trump's 2016 victory, developed an "America First" agenda prioritizing citizens' well-being, contrasting with older conservatism's universal moral commitments. While politically successful, this nationalism has drawn criticism for betraying the Declaration's principles. The article contends that rejecting the Declaration itself would be a mistake, as its principles do not necessitate open borders, unrestricted trade, or interventionist foreign policy. The Declaration affirms universal natural rights but does not grant a right to immigrate or become a citizen. It also supports regulating foreign trade in national interests and does not obligate the U.S. to promote democracy abroad. The Declaration itself affirms national sovereignty, asserting each people's right to control its political fate. Therefore, proponents of "America First" nationalism should not reject the Declaration's universal principles, which are vital to America's political identity.