Judge warns: Freedom of expression in the EU in acute danger
The article presents a critical perspective on the DSA and DDG, suggesting they threaten freedom of speech and democratic discourse in the European Union.
Richter warnt: Meinungsfreiheit in der EU in akuter Gefahr
Translated and summerized by GPT4
By Manfred Kölsch, Richter i.R.
Key Points:
-
Introduction of DSA and DDG
- The Digital Services Act (DSA) takes full effect in Germany on February 17, 2024.
- The accompanying Digitale-Dienste-Gesetz (DDG) is criticized as a “Trojan horse” that masks an attack on constitutional order.
-
Potential for Censorship
- The DSA permits deletion of content on large online platforms, even if not illegal.
- Raises concerns about censorship of “harmful” or “misleading” opinions or information.
-
Vague Definitions and Social Consequences
- “Disinformation” is vaguely defined, leading to ambiguity and potential misuse.
- Legal entries might be labeled illegal, with social consequences for authors.
-
Self-Censorship and Erosion of Democratic Discourse
- Risk of censorship may lead to self-censorship, aligning posts with political narratives.
- This could stifle democratic debate and intellectual engagement.
-
Lack of Legal Clarity and Extended Suspicion
- Criteria for content assessment lack necessary legal clarity.
- Leads to preemptive censorship and overblocking by platforms due to fear of fines.
-
Surveillance and Control
- The DSA establishes a Europe-wide surveillance bureaucracy.
- Contradicts federalism principle and amplifies existing denunciation practices.
-
Undermining Freedom of Expression
- The DSA hollows out the right to freedom of expression and information.
- Contradicts guarantees by EU and national laws.
Conclusion:
The article presents a critical perspective on the DSA and DDG, suggesting they threaten freedom of speech and democratic discourse in the European Union.
No comments yet.