Taxes and fraud

When taxes are used for wrong purposes, there's some logic in thinking it's against our freedom. But this is a distorted point of view.

A lot has been said about taxing as an unfair restriction to freedom, and more so since the Minnesota fraud. You can’t take the fraud cases as the base rule to ditch the whole taxation system. Of course it’s wrong to defraud, but most of the infrastructures in our civilization are built from public funds, and probably the US is not a good example on health and welfare, but there are very good examples in Europe. There’s no discussion about the need of a taxation system. We just need a better distribution of these funds, and perhaps a harder punishment of fraud. Who should contribute more or less is another issue. Taxes should let the productive live somehow better than unemployed, and the unproductive rich (inherited fortunes) should pay more than active businesses. Passive intermediaries should pay more than actual creators of value. And why not, Bitcoin investors should be treated like any other investor, so that taxing wouldn’t discourage the effort, just as any other productive activity. I know this is not the common feeling in this forum, but hey, we’re not living in the wild. If we expect roads to be there, and good, efficient public services, we must face how all this is funded.

Write a comment
No comments yet.