Internet Watchdog Plays Down Fears Over Censorship
eSafety said over-blocking and over-compliance were certainly not the outcomes it wanted from the proposed digital duty of care.
The eSafety commissioner stated that social media companies are unlikely to engage in widespread censorship, despite concerns raised by religious leaders regarding a proposed digital duty of care bill. Commissioner Julie Inman Grant described fears of stifled discourse as a “stretch,” asserting that companies currently aim to display a maximum amount of material. The watchdog clarified that over-blocking and over-compliance are not desired outcomes of the proposed legislation.
- The federal online watchdog, eSafety commissioner, addressed fears of censorship related to Labor’s proposed digital duty of care.
- Religious leaders argued the bill is too vague and could stifle discourse on contentious issues.
- Commissioner Julie Inman Grant dismissed these fears, calling them a “stretch.”
- She stated that companies currently try to show the maximum amount of material, regardless of its nature.
- eSafety clarified that over-blocking and over-compliance are not the desired results of the digital duty of care.
Write a comment