Blaze Media

News, opinion, and entertainment for people who love the American way of life.

Dear airlines, please stop pitching your credit cards at 33,000 feet

I have never considered flying to be a luxurious experience, and this trip was no exception. I don’t think I’m speaking out of turn when I say that all I or anyone else on the flight from Dallas to Detroit on Christmas morning wanted was for it to be over as quickly as possible.I had waited in the inevitable jetbridge backlog, found my seat, dutifully ignored the safety briefing, and was ready to see if I could manage an hour or so of sleep. As the plane reached cruising altitude, I — having momentarily gained the upper hand in the case of Pestritto v. airline seat — began to slip into a light doze.In the back of my mind, I knew it was coming, but that didn't make it any more bearable. The crackle of the PA system, the monotone, forced cheerfulness of the flight attendant as he delivered the fateful words: “We’d like to take this chance to tell you about a special promotion being offered on this flight.”For a brief instant, some small part of me considered pulling the emergency door handle. Surely the icy blast of air at 33,000 feet couldn’t be any worse than enduring the dreaded American Airlines credit card pitch.When I arrive at the airport, I am prepared to suffer.After this brief instant of nihilism, the better angels of my nature prevailed, and I contented myself with a silent sigh, listening to the pitch as I meditated on the script’s use of the passive voice. As if the airline were saying, “This promotion is being pitched without your consent. By whom? No idea. We would certainly never inflict such an indignity upon our paying customers.”Let me take a moment to make my position clear. I understand that air travel is an unpleasant experience. Anyone who has taken a flight more than once in his life almost certainly understands this fact.I have shrugged my shoulders for two hours straight in a middle seat. I have sat on the tarmac for longer than I thought possible. I have nearly missed my flight because it took four TSA officers to handle the bomb threat posed by the pink sippy cup belonging to the toddler in front of me.All that to say: When I arrive at the airport, I am prepared to suffer.However, air travel and I used to have an agreement. Once I made it through the ritual humiliation of the airport process and actually got to my seat on the plane, I was left more or less alone to endure the next few hours as best I could.I grew up making two-day road trips in a Suburban with my parents and seven siblings, so I consider myself something of an expert at enduring hours of cramped travel conditions. The trick is just sort of retreating within yourself, ignoring your surroundings, and letting the dull misery of the situation become a sort of vague background noise.This strategy is why I support Delta’s recent decision to end in-flight refreshments on trips of less than 350 miles. Unless the flight is long enough to warrant it, I don’t want my restless slumber disturbed by a voice asking if I want apple juice like it’s lunchtime at the day care or, if I’m the hapless occupant of an aisle seat, my elbow socket being rearranged by the passage of the snack cart.I want it to just be me, my popping ears, and my very sore rear end until such time as we touch down and I can begin the "Mad Max: Fury Road" experience of trying to get off the plane.I should have known, though, that modernity is never content to rest on its laurels. Like a roaring lion, it goes about constantly seeking whom it might devour — if by “devour” we mean “deprive of both money and will to live.” Since most airline passengers are neither sober nor watchful, the airlines are as good a place for devouring as any.RELATED: Artemis II proves America still knows how to reach for the heavens Jim WATSON/AFP/Getty ImagesAmerican Airlines is not alone in its quest to eliminate any and all in-flight respite. I have sat through what can only be described as lottery drawings on Spirit Airlines (may she rest in peace), heard random promotions for goodness knows what on Frontier, and been pitched on the same Delta credit card I had in my wallet at the time.I understand, to a certain degree, why the airlines see fit to inflict these announcements on their passengers. If you look into it, you’ll find that most airlines today are basically just “banks that happen to fly planes.” They actually lose money on the flying part of the operation, which probably has something to do with the incessant attempts to bring customers over to the profitable side of the business.The details of airline loyalty programs and how they have changed the industry is a story for another time. My concern is twofold.First: How long can I endure these incessant credit card pitches before I commit self-harm or — far worse — break down and get one of them?Second: What’s to stop this most heinous of sales methods from spreading to other forms of transportation? How long will it be before I have to endure automated pitches for the Honda GroundMiles Card whenever I stop at a red light?I don’t expect much when I travel. Whether I’m sitting in Dallas traffic or at cruising altitude over Oklahoma, my greatest desire at this point is to endure the agony unassisted by the vicissitudes of corporate marketing.

Cover image for Dear airlines, please stop pitching your credit cards at 33,000 feet

Will the DOJ indict Fauci? Or will the statute of limitations expire?

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has filed multiple criminal referrals for former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci to the Department of Justice over the geriatric immunologist's apparent false testimony before Congress in 2021.According to Paul, the statute of limitations on charging Fauci over his alleged perjury expires on Monday. If it does, the Biden Justice Department will not be alone in having failed to indict the Biden pardonee credibly accused of helping cover up the likely lab origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.How it startedMonths after testifying before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, "America's doctor" was brought back before the same committee on July 20, 2021, to discuss the origin of COVID-19 and U.S. funding ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Chinese communist lab that possibly manufactured the virus."Dr. Fauci, as you are aware, it is a crime to lie to Congress," Paul said during the hearing."On your last trip to our committee on May 11, you stated that the NIH 'has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.' And yet, gain-of-function research was done entirely in the Wuhan Institute by Dr. Shi and was funded by the NIH," he continued.Paul cited as evidence a paper from scientists at the WIV, including Ben Hu — a EcoHealth Alliance subcontractor who was among the suspected COVID-19 patients zero — that discussed gain-of-function work on coronaviruses and acknowledged funding from NIAID as well as from the United States Agency for International Development's Predict program.RELATED: Former Fauci adviser INDICTED for allegedly hiding emails about the origins of COVID Feature China/Future Publishing/Getty ImagesThe paper describes research both conducted at the Wuhan lab and funded under an NIAID award where genetic information from different SARS-related coronaviruses were combined and fashioned into new artificial viruses capable of infecting human cells."Viruses that in nature only infect animals were manipulated in the Wuhan lab to gain the function of infecting humans," said Paul. "This research fits the definition of the research that the NIH said was subject to the pause in 2014 to 2017 — a pause in funding on gain-of-function."Fauci declined to retract his previous statement that "the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology."In addition to telling Paul that he "never lied before the Congress," Fauci claimed that the experimentation referenced in the paper did not constitute gain-of-function."Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly," added Fauci. "And I want to say that officially."How it's endingPaul raised the alarm earlier this month that "on May 11th, the statute of limitations expires on the possibility of indicting Anthony Fauci for denying under oath that he funded gain-of-function research involving bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, the origin city of the pandemic."There is a five-year statute of limitations on lying to Congress. It's unclear, however, whether May 11 is the deadline to indict Fauci as he reiterated on July 20 that he did not want to amend or retract his statement.The DOJ did not respond to Blaze News' request for comment.The Kentucky senator has counted down the days since, emphasizing that "the American people want Fauci behind bars" — and still, there's been no indictment from the Justice Department.On Monday, Paul tweeted, "Today is the deadline to charge Fauci, or he walks away from one of the biggest cover-ups in American history without ever facing a jury."While Fauci received a "full and unconditional" pardon in former President Joe Biden's name for possible federal crimes going back to 2014, the Trump DOJ has expressed doubt about the pardon's validity.U.S. Pardon Attorney Ed Martin, for instance, said late last year that his "office cannot support the validity of AutoPen pardons for individuals such as Anthony Fauci, Adam Schiff, Mark Milley, and many more without further examination and fact-finding.""In my tenure here, I have not seen any evidence supporting the theory that President Biden was personally aware and authorized these AutoPen'd pardons," added Martin.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Will the DOJ indict Fauci? Or will the statute of limitations expire?

San Diego Padres pitcher self-deports back to Mexico after responding to ridiculous Facebook ad

A promising pitcher for the MLB's San Diego Padres was caught committing an immigration crime in Arizona.Humberto Cruz, a 19-year-old prospect from Monterrey, Mexico, is now listed as "restricted" on his official minor-league page after self-deporting back to Mexico following a criminal complaint last October.'I understand that my actions have fallen short of the standards expected of me.'Cruz was previously listed as the Padres' fifth-most promising prospect in official rankings, the New York Post reported, but has seemingly been removed from the list at the time of this writing.Now, the Mexican has reportedly left the country after he was charged with a felony for transporting illegal aliens for profit and a misdemeanor for being an accessory to improper entry.On October 28, Cruz was spotted by Border Patrol agents in a 2020 BMW SUV with a Mexican license plate near Lukeville, Arizona, a small town on the U.S.-Mexico border. According to the Athletic, Cruz was first seen with one male occupant inside and then, an hour later, was observed to have multiple passengers.Despite legally entering the U.S. through Phoenix, Cruz allegedly had two illegal aliens from Mexico in his vehicle, one of whom was deported just four days earlier.The pitcher then allegedly waived his Miranda rights and told federal agents he responded to a social media ad that was looking for someone to "pick up people for easy money." RELATED: Americans likely to outnumber foreigners at World Cup despite record ticket sales Kevin Carter/Getty Images The baseball player allegedly said he was offered $1,000 for each pickup and that the locations were provided to him through an unknown contact by phone. Cruz traveled from Tucson to Phoenix and admitted he knew "they were illegal" once he picked the passengers up, according to police.Cruz received a $750,000 signing bonus from the Padres organization in February 2024.Under a plea agreement, the government agreed to drop the felony charge, which would have come with a maximum 10-year imprisonment. Still, the misdemeanor conviction meant Cruz was likely to be deported anyway, and he agreed to accept the charges and waive the right to appeal his sentence while leaving of his own accord.Cruz will reportedly lose his work visa for 10 years but is eligible to reapply after five years on the condition of good behavior, the San Diego Union-Tribute reported.RELATED: Judge scolds accuser of ex-Patriots player who said he smacked and choked her, then offered her $100K - YouTube Cruz released a statement through the Padres organization, saying he had "sincere regret" over his "recent lapse in judgment.""I understand that my actions have fallen short of the standards expected of me as a professional and as a representative of this organization. I take responsibility for my conduct and recognize the impact it has had on my teammates, the club, and those who support us. To my teammates and coaches, I apologize for becoming a distraction and for not upholding the level of professionalism you deserve."Cruz stated not only that he let the team and his friends down, but that he also let down the fans by "failing to meet the trust placed" in him.The pitcher added, "I am committed to reflecting on this moment, learning from it, and taking the appropriate steps to move forward in a positive and responsible manner. I will cooperate fully with the organization and any steps required of me."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for San Diego Padres pitcher self-deports back to Mexico after responding to ridiculous Facebook ad

Trans-identifying Indian elected to Scottish parliament despite apparent anti-white hatred, expiring visa

Scotland has produced countless consequential men over the centuries. Having apparently run out of native-born talent — exhausting, perhaps, the ranks of the Bells, Flemings, MacDonalds, Stirlings, and Wallaces — the country has resorted to rule by a foreign squatter.As the result of woke Scottish National Party ministers loosening the rules last year over who could qualify to become a candidate, a male Indian national who holds neither British citizenship nor permanent residency was elected last week to serve as a member of the Scottish Parliament for the Edinburgh and Lothians East region.'British elections for British people.'Q Manivannan, who has boasted of a strong connection to the Tamil Nadu region of India he hails from and whose alleged tweets suggest an intense animus toward white people, was fielded as a candidate by the Scottish Green Party.Scotland's supposed "first non-binary MSP" promised on the campaign trail not just to fight "for the radical change our working-class and marginalized communities need" but to stand "unwaveringly" for his ilk, namely "immigrants or asylum-seekers."While evidently keen to help that class of supposedly "marginalized" people now proven capable of shaping the island's destiny without ever setting anchor, Manivannan appears especially eager to bring his war against biological reality to Holyrood.RELATED: The data continues to stack up against the trans narrative Q Manivannan's fellow citizens line up to vote in the region of India he recently left behind. Riya Mariyam R/NurPhoto/Getty Images.Manivannan identifies as a "queer Tamil immigrant"; uses "they/them" pronouns; campaigned on advancing a "more caring politics rooted in the working class, the queer, and the solidary," and is apparently an expert on "transness.""Transness is blackness. Transness is womanhood," he told fellow travelers at a rally. "Transness is disability. Transness is everything the world wants you to believe that is unlovable.""Our liberation is bound up with every person who's ever been told their body, their land, their life does not matter," added the Indian.There is some uncertainty over whether Manivannan can lawfully serve his five-year parliamentary term, given both that he is in the country on a claimed three-year temporary student visa, and his student visa does not permit him to work more than 20 hours a week. If, however, he is afforded additional wiggle room — which may happen since India remains a British commonwealth country — the Indian national is set to enjoy a six-figure annual salary at Scottish natives' expense.Numerous heritage Britons appear to be less than enthused over the election of a foreign squatter.Robert Jenrick, a British member of parliament, wrote, "I don’t want to live in a country where people on student visas can become elected representatives to national parliaments. He’s crowdfunding from Green Party members for his graduate visa for pete’s sake."In an op-ed on Monday titled, "The 'election' of a foreign student is a travesty of democracy," Tom Tugendhat — a member of the U.K.'s Conservative Party who served as security minister until 2024 — said that the Indian's election was the result of a dysfunctional system."You have to ask: Why did the people of Edinburgh and Lothians East choose them? Well, they didn’t. Or rather they didn’t directly," wrote Tugendhat. "The Scottish Green MSP was the third name on a party list, chosen by a small collection of party apparatchiks and hoisted into Holyrood by an electoral mechanism that puts the party in charge.""An Indian was elected to the Scottish Parliament, even without a permanent visa to stay in the UK," wrote British politician Rupert Lowe, the leader of Restore Britain. "This is wrong."Lowe emphasized that this "should not be allowed to stand" and demanded "British elections for British people."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Trans-identifying Indian elected to Scottish parliament despite apparent anti-white hatred, expiring visa

'Hardly believable': Trump RIPS INTO 2 Supreme Court justices he appointed

President Donald Trump has criticized two of the justices he appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court for ruling against his signature promise to raise revenue by hiking up tariffs.The president said he "loves" Neil Gorsuch but went on to hammer him and Amy Coney Barrett for joining the majority ruling in the tariff case in February — and warned them ahead of another ruling expected on a separate pivotal policy.'I don’t want loyalty, but I do want and expect it for our Country.' "I 'Love' Justice Neil Gorsuch! He’s a really smart and good man, but he voted against me, and our Country, on Tariffs, a devastating move. How do I reconcile this? So bad, and hurtful to our Country," the president posted on Truth Social Sunday."I have, likewise, always liked and respected Amy Coney Barrett, but the same thing with her," he added. "They were appointed by me, and yet have hurt our Country so badly! I do not believe they meant to do so, but their decision on Tariffs cost the United States 159 Billion Dollars that we have to pay back to enemies, and people, companies, and Countries, that have been ripping us off for years."He went on to lament that the two justices have been disloyal to him despite the fact that he appointed them to the highest court of the land."It's hardly believable!" the president continued. "I don’t want loyalty, but I do want and expect it for our Country."Trump then warned the justices that a ruling against his order on birthright citizenship would be economically unsustainable."Sometimes decisions have to be allowed to use Good, Strong, Common Sense as a guide," he wrote. "A negative ruling on Birthright Citizenship, on top of the recent Supreme Court Tariff catastrophe, is not Economically sustainable for the United States of America!"The Supreme Court is expected to issue an opinion on whether the U.S. will continue to grant birthright citizenship to anyone born within U.S. borders, or if citizenship will be limited to those born from a citizen parent.RELATED: Trump executive order imposes 100% tariff on brand-name drugs — Big Pharma fires back The tariff ruling by the Supreme Court had shut down many but not all of the tariff hikes the president had unilaterally imposed on foreign countries.In Nov. 2024, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum released a statement warning then-President-elect Trump that tariffs would only lead to job losses and inflation. Less than three months later, Trump, who had since taken office, hit Mexico with a 25% tariff until the illicit drug trade from Mexico ceased.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for 'Hardly believable': Trump RIPS INTO 2 Supreme Court justices he appointed

'Absolute horses**t': No influencer envy for Robert Downey Jr.; star baffled by their new 'religion'

Actor Robert Downey Jr. has a message for today's internet influencers: Get off my lawn!In a recent appearance on Bran Ferren's "Conversations for Our Daughters" podcast, the 61-year-old star admitted this new crop of DIY entertainers seem like "hucksters" to him. 'I don't know what world you're living into, but I think that that is absolute horses**t.'Downey added that the proliferation of online personalities seeking celebrity without effort has made it harder for anyone with talent to stand out. Phoning it in"People can create celebrity without ever doing much besides rolling a phone on themselves," he said. "And I don't look at that as a negative thing. I just look at it as more like the challenge for individuation is being upped."The New York native also said that he hopes young people can resist falling into a "self-aggrandizing kind of influencer-type thing."Not that the "Iron Man" star dislikes all social media strivers. He revealed that he has even gotten to know a few and found them grounded and accomplished. Still, don't expect him to buy in to the idea that they're the stars of tomorrow. "When I hear people talk about, 'Oh, the stars of the future are going to be influencers,' I go, 'I don't know what world you're living into, but I think that that is absolute horses**t.'"RELATED: Iron MAGA? Comedian Chris D'Elia rants that in 'real life,' Marvel heroes would all vote GOP - YouTube Stream me upDowney noted that even his own teenage son has gotten "caught up" in the influencer world. "Next thing you know, it's like, 'Hey, if you like the way I'm playing this video game, do you wanna send me a donation?' And really, it becomes a religion.""There's something about the influencers today are almost like the Evangelical hucksters of the information age," he continued."At the same token, it's different because we’re playing in this new territory, and so it's a little bit of a frontier, and I don't really have a judgment on it."For his part, the veteran performer said he resists industry pressure to reveal more of himself online, saying it feels inauthentic.RELATED: Tech billionaire Palmer Luckey calls out homeschool haters' hypocrisy ]M. Tran/FilmMagic/Getty ImagesStark realityHe also worries about being reduced to disposable content for insatiable clickbait culture. "I don't wish to be consumed," he explained.The father of three also pondered the "turnover" from traditional media to online that many believe took place in the late 2000s."There's something about this ... there's something about that era that because we were just in it, and you know how it always feels like 2009 was ten years ago."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for 'Absolute horses**t': No influencer envy for Robert Downey Jr.; star baffled by their new 'religion'

PROOF: They Tried to Force Christians to Comply — or Lose Their Funding

What began as a Supreme Court ruling on workplace discrimination quickly became a sweeping federal campaign to enforce gender ideology across American life — and Camille Varone, senior counsel at the DOJ, has proof. According to the DOJ’s 2026 report by the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias, the Biden administration expanded the 2020 Bostock decision far beyond its original scope and used it to rewrite Title IX guidance, pressure public schools, and challenge religious exemptions. Varone tells BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey that the Biden administration “created all sorts of new memorandums, guidance materials, and threatened across the board doctors, schools, school lunch programs, and girls’ sports with compliance, with their views of gender ideology, at risk of losing federal funding.” “It sounds like you’re saying the Biden administration really weaponized against Christian institutions, individuals, and schools,” Stuckey comments. The Biden administration also used the Department of Agriculture to tell public schools that if they did not abide by the rewrite of Title IX and allow boys into girls’ bathrooms, they would not receive SNAP funds, and it considered requests for religious exemptions as “harmful conduct to be regulated.” “So, they really wanted to use this rewrite of Title IX, this transgender issue specifically, to push back on Christians and Christian institutions exercising our beliefs about biology and gender,” she continues. “Is that right?” “That’s exactly right,” Varone responds. Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey? To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for PROOF: They Tried to Force Christians to Comply — or Lose Their Funding

TikTok video exposes America’s reading crisis: Why parents and schools are failing kids

A video has gone viral on TikTok for revealing a literacy crisis in America — showing high school students failing to read a very simple sentence: “She wore a silhouette of clothes that were extraordinary but somewhat gauche.”And BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey believes that one of the reasons for this crisis is not only the method for teaching literacy in schools, but that the amount of parents reading to their children daily has dropped. And according to a study conducted by HarperCollins Publishers, the drop is significant.“I saw this statistic that says only 41% of children aged 0 to 4 are read to daily as of 2025. That is a nine-point drop only since 2019. Only 55%, a little over half of children aged 0 to 5, are read to at least five days a week,” she continues.“There are a lot of parents who are overstimulated. They’re tired. They’re distracted. It’s really not about these kids having their own lack of discipline. It starts with a lack of discipline and bad priorities for parents honestly,” she adds.Stuckey believes that the difficulty parents face finding the time or energy to read to their kids is manifesting in "difficulty for them for the rest of their lives.”And the reason this is creating so much difficulty for children is because “the comprehension of words is necessary for understanding the world.”“It is very difficult to be a diligent student, an informed voter, a productive citizen, a helpful neighbor if you do not understand words,” Stuckey says.But it’s not just the ability to participate in modern society that’s being threatened by the literacy crisis.“Unlike Buddhism, Christianity does not place a premium on silence or the emptying of the mind. Christianity is a word-based faith. You go all the way back to the beginning. God spoke the universe into existence,” Stuckey explains.“He dictated all of creation, including the creation of man and woman who were made in his image. He spoke to Noah. He spoke to and through Moses,” she continues.This is why, Stuckey explains, Christians have historically been “the best communicators in the world.”“Christians dominated academia in this country before giving it over to the liberals and the secularists over time. And now, I think we have the opportunity to take the lead again. We have to. I mean, look at where we are,” she says.“We have schools that are not teaching kids to read. We have people going to college and becoming lawyers and doctors with barely a high school-reading level. We’re scared of objective standards here in the U.S., standards of excellence because of whom they might exclude,” she continues, adding, "And all of us are going to suffer for that.”Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for TikTok video exposes America’s reading crisis: Why parents and schools are failing kids

Overzealous AI regulation is a danger to free speech

The dawn of the AI era has sparked a wide range of reactions, from exhilaration over the technology’s capabilities to deep distress.Such responses to a new communicative tool are nothing new, and indeed, AI presents new and unique challenges that will require deep thought and sensitivity.But a heavy-handed congressional response that erodes long-standing American freedoms isn’t the answer. The Senate Judiciary Committee’s passage last week of SB 3062, the GUARD Act, shows the substantial risk that Congress’ “do something” energy poses to free speech.Restrictions violate the First Amendment by regulating the protected editorial decisions of developers and by infringing on individuals’ rights to create and receive lawful expression.The bill regulates AI chatbots — especially so-called “AI companion” systems — through access limits, design mandates, and disclosure requirements, backed by civil and criminal penalties of up to $100,000 per violation.If enacted, it puts the federal officials squarely in the position of deciding how this technology is built and used, limiting engagement with information and compelling speech along the way.Growing calls for a federal solution to the fragmented landscape of state regulations reflect a clear political appetite for legislative action. And a single national standard has obvious appeal for an industry seeking consistency across jurisdictions. But consistency isn’t the same as constitutionality.If federal proposals like the GUARD Act replicate the speech restrictions found in state laws, they just hardwire those problems into federal law.Take the bill’s age verification requirements. The GUARD Act forces Americans to create accounts and prove their ages. Existing accounts are frozen until verified, and companies are required to recheck users’ ages periodically.Age-verification mandates like this one force individuals to disclose their identity to seek answers and thus give up anonymity, a right the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized as central to free expression.Faced with mandatory identity disclosure, many think twice before asking sensitive questions. Would someone trapped in an abusive relationship be more or less willing to seek advice from a chatbot if she had to surrender her privacy? Or how about the employee who is consistently harassed at work but is worried about asking for advice?There’s a reason that the Federalist Papers were written under a pseudonym. Even public debate sometimes requires distance from the speaker’s identity. That protection is still needed today, allowing people to seek information, test ideas, and ask sensitive questions without fear of legally required exposure.Then there are rules about content. The bill makes it unlawful to design, deploy, or make available chatbots that, in the government’s view, “encourage” or “promote” certain categories of constitutionally protected speech.RELATED: Age verification laws do not make us safer Samuel Boivin/NurPhoto/Getty ImagesWho do we want to be in charge of determining that? Those restrictions violate the First Amendment by regulating the protected editorial decisions of developers and by infringing on individuals’ rights to create and receive lawful expression.Proposals like the GUARD Act dictate how chatbots respond and intrude on editorial judgment by putting Congress’ thumb on the scale of what is acceptable speech. This means control over who can speak, what can be said, and how ideas are expressed.Those choices shape the substance of speech and risk reducing a chorus of voices to a single, government-shaped note.Finally, disclaimer mandates can cross constitutional lines by compelling speech. The GUARD Act requires chatbots to deliver federally imposed messages in every interaction. While informing users, its application in every circumstance alters the content and flow of communication itself.All of this points to a deeper reality that AI systems cannot perfectly predict or control every output. That is not a defect. It’s a core feature of how these models generate responses from probabilistic patterns.Artificial intelligence, and chatbots in particular, has become Washington’s latest political punching bag. Accusations of manipulation and harm are driving a slew of legislative proposals to censor this emerging technology. The GUARD Act isn’t alone. The recently introduced CHATBOT Act presents many of the same threats.The same impulse to move quickly in Congress is playing out nationwide, with proposals in states like Minnesota, Florida, and Washington targeting chatbots through access restrictions, disclosure mandates, and content-related rules.The Constitution doesn’t permit any government to address concerns about AI by broadly restricting protected expression. The First Amendment demands solutions that target illegal conduct without burdening the exchange of ideas.This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

Cover image for Overzealous AI regulation is a danger to free speech

The night of the gun was never-ending — until the day I surrendered to Christ

I remember the night my legs gave out.I woke up to my sister standing in my doorway. She was scared. Our parents were arguing behind a closed bedroom door, voices raised, something different in the tone this time. We walked down the hallway together and knocked.Through recovery and faith, I encountered Jesus not as religion but as relationship.When the door opened, my father was standing there with a loaded gun pressed to his head.My legs went numb. I collapsed onto the floor.Long night's journeyIt wasn’t an isolated moment.Our home was marked by ongoing conflict and instability, the kind that teaches you early how to stay alert, how to read a room, and how to survive without ever really feeling safe.I didn’t have words for what I had just seen. I only knew something wasn’t right in a way I couldn’t fix and that whatever I thought “normal” was, it wasn’t this.That kind of moment doesn’t always explode your life right away. Sometimes it just sits there, quiet and unprocessed, and follows you.It followed me. It bled into my personal and romantic relationships and ultimately skewed my view of the world and of myself. I learned to survive rather than connect — to perform rather than belong. I struggled to understand friendship, trust, and emotional safety. And over time, resentment toward my parents, especially my father, became part of my identity.Seeking 'normal'As I got older, that disconnect showed up everywhere. I didn’t feel like I fit in. I struggled to form real friendships. I was made fun of just for being myself, and after a while, you start to believe there’s something wrong with you. I didn’t know what the problem was. I just knew I felt it.So when drugs and alcohol showed up, they didn’t feel like destruction. They felt like a solution. They quieted something I couldn’t explain. They made me feel normal, or at least closer to the version of myself I thought I was supposed to be.That’s the trap, because it works — at first. What I didn’t understand was that I wasn’t fixing anything. I was covering something I didn’t want to look at.Later, when things got worse, it was labeled a "mental health" issue.My father struggled with mental illness, and for many years I wrestled with my own diagnoses, some of which, in hindsight, did not fully capture what was truly happening beneath the surface.I was prescribed medical marijuana. But instead of helping, it began triggering severe adverse reactions, including escalating instability, mania, and psychosis that distorted my judgment and sense of reality.RELATED: Camp Hope offers Christ-centered healing to America’s veterans ptsdusa.orgNot brokenLooking back now, I don’t believe there was something fundamentally broken in me. I believe there was something unaddressed. There’s a difference.I kept looking for something to fix the symptoms, but nothing was touching the root. And that only works for so long.Eventually, everything catches up. It did for me.Addiction did not destroy my life overnight. It unfolded through cycles of defiance, denial, and relapse. Each time I tried to regain control on my own terms, I fell deeper into chaos. It culminated in a destructive spiral that led me to a reckless and disorienting bender in Atlantic City. The consequences I now faced were legal. There was no talking my way out of this or pretending it didn't exist. I had reached a point where I could no longer outrun the reality of what my life had become.Brought to my kneesIn hindsight, I believe God had to bring me to my knees.The illusion of control was gone. I finally realized there was no way I was getting out of this under my own power. And that's when change finally became possible.It became possible because faith became real — not something I grew up around, not something I understood intellectually, but something lived.Scripture says, “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.” And also, “You shall be called by a new name.”I used to hear that and think it sounded nice. Now I understand it.Redeemed and reconciledBecause my identity did change — not overnight, not perfectly, but fundamentally. I was no longer defined by what I had been through or how I had responded to it. Through recovery and faith, I encountered Jesus not as religion but as relationship. Through prayer, God revealed to me that I was not meant to be ashamed of my past but to embrace it, bring it into the light, and allow it to help others.One of the most profound outcomes has been reconciliation with my father. The man I once viewed as the source of my wounds became part of a redemption story marked by grace, forgiveness, and healing.Today, I live a life that is sober and grounded in faith. I’ve worked the Twelve Steps and now help guide others through the process. I am actively involved with Chain Breakers and bringing Christ-centered recovery to those who need it.If there is one message I hope to share, it is that unhealed childhood trauma, misunderstood mental health struggles, and substance abuse are deeply interconnected. Healing requires both spiritual surrender and honest conversations about mental health.I share this with humility, knowing I too remain a work in progress. It's my hope that the more we bring stories like mine into the light, the less power shame and isolation will have over those who are still struggling.

Cover image for The night of the gun was never-ending — until the day I surrendered to Christ

It’s Past Time for the Government to Rein In AI

Recently, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett revealed that the White House is contemplating issuing an executive order that would regulate and evaluate AI models similar to how the Food and Drug Administration evaluates new food and drugs. This is a good idea that deserves serious consideration. Here is why. Frontier models are automating complex, multistep cyberattacks at ‘machine speed.’ There are several major concerns with AI cybersecurity that haven’t been fully addressed. There is the use of AI to attack a cyber asset (adversarial), and there are attacks on AI tools like chatbots and voicebots that AI can accomplish with amazing speed and cleverness (AI security). There is the use of AI in phishing attacks, and there are deepfakes. All of these pose grave threats to American businesses and the federal government, with the potential to affect financial information, privacy, personal data, trade secrets, and national security. The CEO of CrowdStrike recently sounded the alarm on this issue. We’re seeing an explosion of new threat actors that may not have all the superior skills to figure this out, but they can use generative AI to advance their attacks very quickly and to make them scalable. There’s going to be a greater proliferation of adversaries than we’ve ever seen. And that is just going to grow, probably exponentially. A recent report by the National Counterintelligence and Security Center highlighted findings from the AI Security Institute showing that frontier models are automating complex, multistep cyberattacks at “machine speed.” With some models already matching the pace of human experts at a fraction of the cost, and other models and systems completely outpacing humans, the threat is accelerating due to both the expanding expertise of humans and the expanding capabilities of the AI models, as recently announced by Anthropic about its latest models’ ability to find vulnerabilities in “well-tested” systems. Another report by ReliaQuest described how a new malware strain called “DeepLoad” can use AI-enabled obfuscation to bypass traditional static defenses in enterprise environments. These kinds of reports are useful, but it is difficult for us mere humans to keep up with the new daily threats. We need a machine-readable database, much like the computer virus databases that have existed for decades. The great variety of threats that are invented on a daily basis is extremely concerning. While the Open Worldwide Application Security Project AI Top 10 list is a useful start, it is far from what today’s systems need to address emerging threats. Our federal government must prioritize a framework solution immediately. The technology industry has databases of cyber threats, but we also need to share information on how to mitigate them. This can be deeply technical and require specialized knowledge, not just of large language models but of other complicated technologies like audio signal processing. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, a non-regulatory federal agency within the Department of Commerce, has been a leader in providing recommendations for responsible AI; however, it needs greater enforcement authority. RELATED: The terrifying scale of the data center land-grab Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg/Getty Images Governments are usually slow to update anything, as they should be. Legislative branches are even slower. Congress should not be writing detailed technical metrics and methodologies for cybersecurity. A solution is that Congress should empower a regulatory agency to monitor and enforce AI safety standards. A somewhat similar example is the FDA, which protects public health by ensuring the safety and security of food, drugs, biological products, and medical devices. It regulates products by reviewing research and conducting inspections. What Congress should do is address the need for an AI cybersecurity framework by statutorily tasking NIST with creating and managing a centralized AI cybersecurity threat database to which all software vendors can (and should) submit new threats. While NIST would be a great place to centralize communications of the resources, it is the private sector that will provide most of the intelligence around what the threats are and how to mitigate them. After all, NIST is already mandated to provide similar resources as part of the Secure Software Development Framework under federal cybersecurity policy and Executive Order 14028, and through the National Vulnerability Database. We need a framework that not only keeps up with attacks, but is ahead of the antagonists in the AI war, no matter who they are or what their intentions may be. A NIST-led national framework would ensure that Americans, businesses, and the federal government can be protected from the lightning-fast, ever-advancing cybersecurity threats. This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

Cover image for It’s Past Time for the Government to Rein In AI

Security video captures BRUTAL random assault on 77-year-old man by 2 males in Seattle

The brutal and senseless attack on a 77-year-old man by two males in downtown Seattle in April was captured on surveillance video and released to the public as police sought one of the suspects.The two men appear to be laughing as one rears back to punch the elderly victim with great force from behind.The two left the man bleeding on the sidewalk.The victim drops to the ground, and one of the assailants pretends to kick him before pulling back at the last second, according to an account by prosecuting attorney Ryan D. Turner.The two left the man bleeding on the sidewalk. Police found him with a head injury, as well as a broken arm and knee.Tips from eyewitnesses led police to identify one suspect as 29-year-old Ahmed Abdullahi Osman. Osman was released after being charged with second-degree assault but was later the subject of a $200,000 warrant from King County Superior Court.A second suspect was identified as 27-year-old Jessean Tyrell Elion and arrested on Monday based on tips from the public after the video of the attack was released.Elion was booked into the King County Jail before a judge set a bail of $100,000 for second-degree assault."The allegations of an attack on a stranger is very serious," a judge said about the incident.Police said they only learned of the second alleged assailant after reviewing surveillance video. Casey McNerthney with the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office told KING-TV the video was key to arresting the second suspect."It's absolutely helpful, it's so helpful when you have that because jurors now expect that, and even when you have great witnesses, there's always the question if you don't have video or why isn't there video," McNerthney said.RELATED: Adult son beat his elderly father to death with ceramic bowl and then played video games, police say "When you have cameras like that you see higher rates of referrals to prosecutors and often times higher conviction rates," he added.The KING report pointed out that Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, a democratic socialist, has criticized the surveillance system that captured the video of the assault. Her office offered no new comments about the incident.Redmond Police said their Real-Time Information Center aided police in identifying the suspects.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Security video captures BRUTAL random assault on 77-year-old man by 2 males in Seattle

Elderly man dies after suspect — who was in police custody just hours earlier — shoves him down subway steps: NYPD

An elderly man has died after the suspect in his killing — who was in police custody just hours earlier — shoved him down subway entrance steps in New York City on Thursday night, police told WCBS-TV.The attack against the 76-year-old man occurred just before 9:30 p.m. in the city's Chelsea neighborhood at West 18th Street and 7th Avenue, the station said.'Disgusting.'Responding officers found Ross Falzone on the subway stairs with head injuries, WCBS said, adding that he was rushed to Bellevue Hospital in critical condition and later died.The station said police believe they know who carried out the crime since the suspect was taken into custody earlier Thursday.Police told WCBS that officers around 3:30 p.m. Thursday encountered the suspect behaving erratically outside the NYPD's 17th Precinct.The male was taken into custody, the station said, and officers brought him to Bellevue Hospital. WCBS said he was taken to the psychiatric emergency room for evaluation — and released an hour later.RELATED: Thug who's been deported 4 times faces upgraded charges after elderly man he's accused of shoving onto NYC subway tracks dies Surveillance video around 9:30 p.m. Thursday recorded Falzone approaching the subway — and the same male who had been taken into custody earlier in the day was seen walking quickly behind him and then shoving the elderly victim down the steps, police told WCBS.Falzone struck his head about halfway down the steps, the station added.Emergency responders were called, WCBS said, adding that Falzone was rushed to Bellevue Hospital but died just before 3 a.m. Friday.Police are searching for the suspect, the station said, adding that the NYPD hasn't released his name or description.Observers commenting under the WCBS video report about the elderly man's death are beyond done. Some examples:"This is what you vote for in blue city NY," one commenter said."Disgusting," another user stated."There will be no justice," another commenter lamented."The powers that be do this because they're not scared of being dragged out and held accountable," another user declared.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Elderly man dies after suspect — who was in police custody just hours earlier — shoves him down subway steps: NYPD

Britain's first homosexual 'parent' via baby purchase charged with rape, sexual exploitation

Barrie Drewitt-Barlow, the 57-year-old multimillionaire owner of Isthmian League football club Maldon and Tiptree, has long been an advocate for homosexuals acquiring children, specifically through surrogacy. In 1999, Drewitt-Barlow and Tony Barlow became Britain's first homosexual couple registered as "parents" through surrogacy, having purchased twins for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Altogether, the couple ended up buying five children from four surrogate mothers in the United States before Drewitt-Barlow left his "husband" for the young ex-boyfriend of one of the girls in his care. 'They have groomed them,' a UK prosecutor claims. With his new squeeze, Scott Drewitt-Barlow — and his ex temporarily living with them in a Florida mansion — the homosexual activist quickly obtained another child through in vitro fertilization, and then another two. While Barrie Drewitt-Barlow has drawn ample criticism over his manner of acquiring babies, he is now in hot water for his alleged dealings with an older demographic. Barrie Drewitt-Barlow — who claimed on British television last year that he paid a super model over $68,000 for her eggs to reduce the risk of having an "ugly" child — and his 32-year-old "husband," Scott, were arrested in Essex, U.K., on Wednesday and slapped with numerous sexual assault and sexual exploitation charges. RELATED: 'There is no mama': How a viral video accidentally exposed the true cost of gay adoption Nathan Stirk/Getty Images The United Kingdom's Crown Prosecution Service announced on Friday that the elder gay man has been charged with three counts of sexual assault on a male; four counts of rape of a male 16 or older; and two counts of arranging or facilitating travel of another person with a view to exploitation. Scott Drewitt-Barlow has been charged with one count of sexual assault on a male; one count of rape of a male 16 or older; and two counts of arranging or facilitating travel of another person with a view to exploitation. Christian Meikle of the CPS stated, "The Crown Prosecution Service has decided to charge Barrie Drewitt-Barlow and Scott Drewitt-Barlow following a police investigation into alleged human trafficking for sexual exploitation and rape." Prosecutor Serena Berry said, "It is alleged they have both targeted young males, they have recruited them, they have befriended them, they have groomed them," reported the BBC. Oliver Snodin, the couple's defense lawyer, said that his clients "strenuously denied" the allegations. Police raided the couple's home in Essex as well as Barrie Drewitt-Barlow's pub in Braintree. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Britain's first homosexual 'parent' via baby purchase charged with rape, sexual exploitation

The data continues to stack up against the trans narrative

For years, the public has been sold a false narrative: Children who experience gender distress must be affirmed — socially, hormonally, and even surgically — or they will suffer devastating mental health consequences.However, now that some time has passed, the data shows a very different picture. The treatments being presented as lifesaving are not addressing the pain and root problem whatsoever.A large-scale Finnish study tracking young people referred for gender dysphoria found that the primary driver of poor mental health outcomes was not gender identity itself, but underlying psychiatric conditions.Even more unsettling, medical interventions such as hormones and surgeries did not demonstrate a clear reduction of suicide risk. In other words, the treatments being presented as lifesaving are not addressing the pain and root problem whatsoever. The current model of treating gender-confused youth is not delivering on its promises. When I was a teenager, I was subjected to coercion to “become” a boy because my doctors and counselors peddled this as the solution to all of my problems. Turns out, it wasn’t. I vividly remember walking into many doctors’ and therapists’ offices. I was depressed, had an eating disorder, and grew up in a tumultuous environment as a kid. That combination is usually a recipe for disaster. The root cause wasn’t that I was trans; it was that I had been through several traumatic experiences that no teenager or adolescent should face. I am a detransitioner, meaning I am someone who went through the processes of “gender-affirming care” and have now reverted to identifying with my biological sex — a woman.My experience is just one of many. Several of my friends and peers have experienced the same coercion and pressure to “accept” that they are another sex. The Finnish study is not alone, however. It also aligns with another study done in the U.K., which found that the evidence for pediatric gender medicine is “remarkably weak” and that young patients often present with complex mental health needs requiring comprehensive psychological care, not surgical mutilation. Together, these studies show a clear picture: The way that we currently handle this issue is completely wrong. Children who present with distress, a rough home life, and being chronically online are often put on a conveyor belt of social transition, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries. Even more outrageous is that some of these can get approved in a doctor’s office without the consent of a parent or guardian. To do this behind parents’ backs and to encourage secrecy surrounding their social transition should be a crime. RELATED: DEI went into hiding — but remains as dangerous as ever Carl Lokko/Getty ImagesThe result of these practices has been disastrous for trust in our institutions, our health care system, and our school districts. Escalating these so-called treatments only further amplifies their harmful effects. Hormonal interventions affect bone density, fertility, and long-term endocrine function. Surgical interventions are irreversible. These are serious medical decisions being made for patients who are, by definition, still developing.My fight for justice is not simply about my own experience, although I have been through hell and back. It is fundamentally a question of ethics in medicine that the legal system must answer. The evidence is stacking up against the false narrative that trans surgeries equate to lifesaving care. Children placed on this path often do not and will not fully understand its consequences until years later. By then, the damage has already been done. Without action in every state, every medical institution, and every governing body, there will be continued pressure to worship an ideology with no scientific backing. The data is no longer in question. The evidence is settled. I believe the consensus is clear: We must end this abominable practice immediately.

Cover image for The data continues to stack up against the trans narrative

Spencer Pratt gives socialist mayoral candidate a wake-up call at debate: 'She's gonna get stabbed in the neck!'

Reality TV star Spencer Pratt demolished his Democratic competition in a combative debate Wednesday evening in the Los Angeles mayoral debate.Pratt went after Nithya Raman, who is aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America, after she tried to claim success in her efforts to ease the homelessness crisis as a city councilwoman.'I blame this person for burning my house and my parents' house and my town and all my neighbors down.' Pratt brutally mocked the "Inside Safe" program touted by Raman during the debate."First off, Inside Safe, I like to say Inside Safe makes all of us outside, unsafe," Pratt joked."The reality is, no matter how many beds you give these people, they are on super meth," Pratt added. "They are on fentanyl. The DEA statistic says 93% of this is a drug addiction problem. I will go below the Harbor Freeway tomorrow with [Raman] and we can find some of these people she's going to offer treatment for. She's going to get stabbed in the neck!" Pratt also went on the attack against incumbent Democratic Mayor Karen Bass, whose incompetence allegedly led to his house being burned down in the Pacific Palisades fires. Raman accused Bass and Pratt of working together to elbow her out of the race."First off, Mayor Bass and I are definitely not working together," Pratt responded, to which Bass replied by laughing."I blame this person for burning my house and my parents' house and my town and all my neighbors' down," Pratt jabbed.He slammed both Bass and Raman of perpetuating the same old leftist policies that had led to a severe decline in living standards in Los Angeles.Pratt appears to be making inroads despite running as a Republican with an electorate overwhelmingly identifying as Democrat. One report found that he had been able to raise more campaign funds than either of his competitors.RELATED: This underdog candidate's app will expose the politicians to blame for LA's shocking filth Raman had previously been compared to the socialist upstart Zohran Mamdani, who pulled an upset victory to gain the New York City mayor's office. After a stammering incompetent appearance on the debate stage, Raman's campaign is facing heavy criticism."What really surprised me is how rough of a night Nithya Raman had," Dustin Gardiner of Politico said to KNBC-TV. "She was struggling with some of her answers. The moderators were struggling to get her to answer some of the yes and no questions."Gardiner said people believing Pratt would "faceplant" in his first political debate were wrong. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Spencer Pratt gives socialist mayoral candidate a wake-up call at debate: 'She's gonna get stabbed in the neck!'

Glenn Beck EDUCATES woke radio host Charlamagne on assassination attempt against Trump

When “The Breakfast Club” host Charlamagne tha God commented on the latest assassination attempt against President Trump, he appeared to empathize with the shooter — and Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck called him out on it.Glenn pointed out that Charlamagne's take sounded like a justification for political violence and Charlamagne went on the defense, accusing Glenn of skewing his argument and being unable to empathize with struggling Americans.And while Glenn still is “sure” Charlamagne tha God is “a pleasant man,” he believes he had a poor response. “You know who Glenn Beck is, right? Y’all know who Glenn Beck is, right? He was recently having a conversation on his radio show, I believe, about some of my comments in regards to the shooting that happened at the White House Correspondents' Dinner," he began.“My comments were simple. There is no place for political violence in our society. None. I don’t condone it, but I think we do ourselves a disservice when we don’t talk about how people can become radicalized. And the reality is the Trump administration has caused so much pain to people’s everyday lives that some folks are fed up and willing to risk it all,” he continued.“I don’t agree with vigilante justice,” he added. “I don’t think political violence is the answer, but we have to have honest conversations about how these people are being radicalized. Glenn Beck knows this.”“I really like you,” Glenn responds, “but I think you’re an idiot on this.”Glenn points out that while Charlamagne denounces the violence, he then uses the word “but” to say he understands it.“You see what happens when you use the word ‘but’?” he asks, demonstrating, “‘I’m against assassination, but I can understand how one got there’ is not nuance. It’s surrender with a smile.”“Once you grant the logic, you’ve already seated the assassin at the table of legitimate debate. There is no seat at the table for the assassin. You’ve told the next killer that his grievance is human and understandable, even if his bullet becomes regrettable,” Glenn explains.“That’s not compassion,” he says, adding, “That is your darker self putting on a suit, calling it insight.”Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for Glenn Beck EDUCATES woke radio host Charlamagne on assassination attempt against Trump

WATCH: Video shows alleged drunk driver nearly mowing down boy on dirt bike. She allegedly was 'so drunk' she 'face-planted.'

A wild video has gone viral showing an alleged drunk driver steering her car up on a sidewalk and seemingly chasing a child riding a dirt bike in Washington state. The "crazy" suspect also was accused of burglarizing a nearby residence after nearly mowing down the boy.The Spokane County Sheriff's Office said in a statement that deputies responded to a report of a reckless and aggressive driver in Cheney just after 6 p.m. April 28. 'She was smashing the front door, and she stumbled off because she looked so drunk.'"During the incident, the suspect drove up on the sidewalk and attempted to hit a juvenile riding a bike," police stated.The statement read, "The driver chased the juvenile on the sidewalk before reentering the roadway and leaving the area."Deputies spoke with witnesses and watched cellphone video a neighbor recorded of the incident. The video shows a motorist behind the wheel of a silver Ford Focus driving down a residential street and honking the horn. Suddenly, the driver steers the car up on the sidewalk and accelerates toward a child riding a dirt bike, the viral video shows."This woman is crazy," the neighbor is heard saying in the video the sheriff's office released Monday."She’s trying to run this … oh my God … You’re kidding! Oh my God," the person recording the wild video is heard screaming.RELATED: 'How much have you had to drink tonight, Wally?' Former police chief dragged from car, arrested for DUI in wild bodycam video Police said the child was not hit or injured during the "extremely dangerous incident."Within 25 minutes of the initial report, police were alerted about a potential burglary nearby. Police said they were notified around 6:30 p.m. in regard to a "reported residential burglary" about a mile away from the driving incident."The victim, who was not home, said he was watching a suspect on his live security system trying door handles, and it was unclear if the suspect entered the residence," the sheriff's office stated.Deputies went to the location of the reported break-in and noticed a silver Ford Focus parked in the driveway. Police identified the suspect as 56-year-old Wendy A. Clemente."She explained she took her dog for a ride, looking for other dogs to socialize with," police said of Clemente.Law enforcement said Clemente told investigators she noticed dogs fenced in the yard at the residence, and she stopped. According to the statement, Clemente confessed that she didn't know the homeowner but "denied entering or attempting to enter his residence."The homeowner disputed Clemente's claims and said she was "stumbling around" and "bouncing off trees" on his property. The homeowner, 48-year-old Lloyd Gaines, told the Daily Mail, "She was smashing the front door, and she stumbled off because she looked so drunk. She fell off my porch and face-planted."Gaines told the news outlet that Clemente entered his home and did "rustle through" his belongings, "tossed stuff around," and examined his wife's jewelry but didn't steal any items. Gaines said he and his wife were not at home when Clemente allegedly entered their residence; his Ring doorbell camera notified him.The statement read, "Despite indicators that Clemente was impaired, she denied drinking alcohol or consuming any drugs, but later changed her story and admitted to drinking alcohol."When police informed Clemente that she was under arrest for driving under the influence, she reportedly put up a fight."While trying to put her in the back of a patrol car, she resisted and even tried to kick a deputy," according to police.Deputies "eventually" restrained her in the back of the police vehicle. Deputies secured a search warrant to obtain a sample of Clemente's blood for testing. Clemente said she didn't recall the alleged incident with the child, police said.Clemente was booked into the Spokane County Jail and charged with first-degree attempted assault, DUI, and first-degree criminal trespass.At the arraignment the following day, Spokane County Superior Court Commissioner N. Swennumson ordered Clemente released on her own recognizance without needing to post bond, according to police.The New York Post reported that Clemente pleaded not guilty to all the charges. The Daily Mail reported that Clemente is a U.S. Army veteran.The Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office did not immediately respond to Blaze News' request for comment.Clemente is scheduled to appear in court on May 20. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for WATCH: Video shows alleged drunk driver nearly mowing down boy on dirt bike. She allegedly was 'so drunk' she 'face-planted.'

White House rips into 'left lunatic' Mark Hamill for posting image of Trump in grave

The actor famous for portraying a sci-fi hero cast himself as a villain with his latest anti-Trump post and got nailed with fierce backlash.On Wednesday, Mark Hamill posted on BlueSky, the progressive social media platform, a denunciation of President Donald Trump with an image of the president lying in a grave.'This kind of rhetoric is exactly what has inspired three assassination attempts in two years against our President.' "If Only — He should live long enough to witness his inevitable devastating loss in the midterms, be held accountable for his unprecedented corruption, impeached, convicted & humiliated for his countless crimes," Hamill wrote."Long enough to realize he'll be disgraced in the history books, forevermore," the "Star Wars" actor added with the hashtag "Don the con."The image appeared to be an outdated death wish from 2024 and was immediately excoriated on social media."Mark Hamill is one sick individual. These Radical Left lunatics just can’t help themselves," reads a statement from the White House Rapid Response team. "This kind of rhetoric is exactly what has inspired three assassination attempts in two years against our President.""I think Mark Hamill belongs in jail. He is using his notoriety to wish harm on the President. That only bolsters the crazed lunatics, who might act upon such a wish," one user responded on the X platform."Damn in this photo Trump looks as dead as Mark Hamill’s career has been for the last 30 years," another reply reads."He is a sick individual. So sad to see a movie hero turn into such an ugly soul," another detractor said.The tone-deaf post from Hamill comes at a time when Washington, D.C., is still reeling from an attempt on the president's life at the White House Correspondents' Dinner and a shooting at the National Mall after the vice presidential motorcade drove by.RELATED: George Lucas strikes back at woke critics of Star Wars Hamill also recently appeared in a video with former President Barack Obama promoting his presidential library in Chicago."A Star Wars-themed ad for the Obama Library — a library which looks like a fragment of the Death Star," one commentator joked.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for White House rips into 'left lunatic' Mark Hamill for posting image of Trump in grave

'Crawl': Killer gators make for gruesome guests in overlooked creature feature

There’s nothing wrong with watching “The Silence of the Lambs” again, especially to honor the film’s 35th anniversary. With or without fava beans.The same holds for other genre classics like “Rosemary’s Baby,” “The Shining,” “The Exorcist” and “Halloween” (1978).The unrelenting creature brought to life with lo-fi special effects makes this a fine example of 'less is more storytelling.What about horror films that slipped by our pop-culture radar, settling into streaming obscurity? The following five films got little attention on release. They may have underperformed at the box office or simply debuted on a streamer sans fanfare.Each is well worth a look — maybe even while uncorking a nice Chianti.'Crawl' (2019) If you see just one killer alligator movie this year, make it "Crawl," which Quentin Tarantino dubbed his favorite film of 2019.Kaya Scodelario stars as a young woman checking in on her Dad (Barry Pepper) during a brutal Florida hurricane. She can’t find him at first, and his home has started to flood. Badly. That brings more than just the threat of black mold insurance claims. Some killer gators have decided to investigate the house, and Scodelario’s character would make a tasty snack.Yes, it sounds “Sharknado”-adjacent, but the movie's hokey premise is offset by first-rate direction from horror vet Alexandre Aja (“High Tension,” “The Hills Have Eyes” (2006)). The father-daughter dynamic is handled with care, giving gravitas to the story without diminishing the chill factor.'Hush' (2016) This Netflix original boasts a can’t-miss gimmick. What if the protagonist in a home invasion movie were deaf and couldn’t hear the intruder breaking into her home? Every step and crash fell on deaf ears. Literally.Horror maestro Mike Flanagan (“Doctor Sleep,” “The Fall of the House of Usher”) takes it from there, maximizing that plot device for a pulse-pounding affair that skimps on horror’s usual eye-roll moments. Credit star/co-writer Kate Siegel for crafting a credible heroine, one who never falls victim to girlbossery.Instead, the film finds new ways to explore the central hook while allowing Siegel’s character to flash her survival instincts.Yes, it has some slasher film DNA, but the thrilling setup makes it far more than a blood-and-guts-a-thon.RELATED: Killer bear flick 'Backcountry' puts big-budget thrillers to shame IFC Midnight'Splinter' (2008) Shea Whigham is one of Hollywood’s busiest character actors. Think “Joker,” “Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning,” “Boardwalk Empire,” and many more projects.This micro-indie takes advantage of his screen presence, casting him as a crook on the lam with his reluctant gal pal. The duo abduct a couple while fleeing Johnny Law before the four run into an unexpected obstacle: a bizarre, stick-like creature that traps them in a convenience store.The setting couldn’t be starker, forcing us to focus on the squabbling foursome. That, plus the unrelenting creature brought to life with lo-fi special effects, makes this a fine example of “less is more” storytelling.The rest is up to Whigham, who proves his crooked character may have a redemptive arc lurking within.'Haunt' (2019) “From the writers of ‘A Quiet Place’” wasn’t the marketing draw the film’s studio imagined. Still, Scott Beck and Bryan Woods’ directorial effort delivers a straightforward horror film done just right.The plot screams Genre Film 101, with a gaggle of attractive young people in search of Halloween high jinks. They stumble upon a haunted house attraction with terrible marketing but a decidedly creepy vibe.Little do they realize the source of said vibes.There’s little about “Haunt” that reinvents the horror movie template. It’s the efficient scares, imaginative twists, and capable cast that seal the deal. The film became Shudder’s most-watched movie premiere of 2019.'Rogue' (2007) If you see just one killer crocodile film this year, make it this smart Aussie thriller. Director Greg McLean (“Wolf Creek”) leverages his homeland’s stunning vistas and a better-than-expected cast for a slick terrorfest. Radha Mitchell (“Man on Fire”) stars as a tour guide steering vacationers through the country’s Northern Territory. The trouble starts when her jerk of an ex (“Avatar’s” Sam Worthington) interrupts the riverboat tour.That’s nothing compared to what comes next. A massive croc terrorizes the boat, feasting on vacationers in the process. The serene setting lulls us into a false sense of security, but the creature feature scares prove as nasty as needed. Co-stars Michael Vartan (“Alias”) and a pre-fame Mia Wasikowska (“Alice in Wonderland”) provide the character beats, allowing us to invest in the dwindling band of survivors.Don’t get too attached to them, though.

Cover image for 'Crawl': Killer gators make for gruesome guests in overlooked creature feature