Shaping Pro-Human AI
As AI narratives evolve to escape scrutiny, pro-human AI policies, rules, and rights must also move forward | Edition #287
Co-founder of the AI, Tech & Privacy Academy (1,300+ participants), Author of Luiza's Newsletter (87,000+ subscribers), Mother of 3.
As AI narratives evolve to escape scrutiny, pro-human AI policies, rules, and rights must also move forward | Edition #287
Japan is the latest country to amend its privacy law to foster AI development. By undoing digital rights, countries might be opening the door to a broader erosion of fundamental rights | Edition #286
Many will be surprised to learn that China's approach to AI ethics is more comprehensive, structured, and pragmatic than what we find today in the United States and the European Union | Edition #285
Nobody can fully predict what two decades from now will look like, but generative AI has already led to three important divides that are starting to shape society | Edition #284
My conversation with Dr. Raffaele Ciriello and Dr. Jessica Szczuka about their new papers on the risks and governance of AI companions | Edition #283
The White House's recommendations for a national AI policy ignore most AI risks and harms and seek to shield AI companies from legal accountability | Edition #282
The AI industry wants human work to be replaced by AI, but this is only possible if most people, companies, and governments agree with the "no work" paradigm. Hopefully, it won't happen | Edition #281
The time for careful consideration of AI regulation options is now. In a few years, it could be too late | Edition #280
In a surprise for many, the state of New York is emerging as a global leader in pro-human AI laws. Here's what it means | Edition #279
The AI industry's acceleration narrative ignores basic facts about the human body, the human mind, human behavior, and human societies. It might drag us to a dystopian future | Edition #278
The challenge of regulating, governing, and scrutinizing the use of AI for national defense and military purposes | Edition #277
Over the past few weeks, it has become clear that AI faces a significant public trust problem, which might lead to slower or decreased adoption. For some companies, this could be fatal | Edition #276
My conversation with Prof. Woodrow Hartzog and Prof. Jessica Silbey about their new paper on AI's negative impact on society | Edition #275
Implementing America's AI Action Plan, the U.S. has launched its first federal AI literacy framework. Here is what you need to know | Edition #274
AI companies are pushing an "AI-first" worldview that serves them, not society. We do not have to accept it | Edition #273
Beyond their Super Bowl ads, what OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Amazon do not tell you about their AI business models | Edition #272
Anthropic is advancing legally questionable theories of AI personality to support an exceptionalist system for AI and weaker accountability frameworks for AI companies | Edition #268
Authorities should require AI companies to 1) limit the purposes of their AI systems; 2) respect sector-specific rules; 3) be held accountable for the harm their AI systems cause | Edition #267
The Grok "undressing" scandal | Edition #265