Decent Newsroom
Sign In

Dug

Dug@primal.net

Being the man my dog thought I was (also GFY) he liked knots

Editorial Articles Media Highlights

Unfortunately, the country has moved beyond its illustrious history of a global empire and even beyond the remnants of where the promise of future economic growth could offset the ever-increasing pile of national debt. Where the UK is now requires more severe action, (or a productivity miracle, if the politicians could imagine and support such a thing), so the idea of not simply taxing the billionaires but taxing anything that moves (weirdly similar to a recently unearthed Peter Mandelsson comment) may plug the immediate hole in public finances, but will ultimately destroy the nation.

While staying away from exploring the details of more sensitive topics, even in the UK there appears to be legal precedence from Scottow -v- CPS judgment that while harassment is a crime, speech that “offends, shocks and disturbs” is protected by article 10 of the Public Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

“Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having”

You may adopt them formally or simply let them guide your choices. You may announce them or hold them privately. What matters is whether you act on them when acting is costly, when no one is watching, when it would be easier to make an exception.

What matters is whether you act on them when acting is costly, when no one is watching, when it would be easier to make an exception.

Then, with an awareness of the broader competitive market for students, as universities continually want to increase numbers, there may be a tendency to reduce entry requirements or broadening the scope of acceptable qualifications, to allow more students to experience university, but ultimately, increase the number of bodies through the door.

While staying away from exploring the details of more sensitive topics, even in the UK there appears to be legal precedence from Scottow -v- CPS judgment that while harassment is a crime, speech that “offends, shocks and disturbs” is protected by article 10 of the Public Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

“Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having”

What matters is whether you act on them when acting is costly, when no one is watching, when it would be ​easier to make an exception.